Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

20:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Anome

I note that you have been thinking today whether the article PF-07321332 should be moved to Paxlovid. I think you did the right thing by leaving it where it is for now. Paxlovid is definitely a Pfizer trademark and as far as I can determine they have not yet announced a proper "common name" for the compound. Pharma and AgChem companies are increasingly trying to avoid using common names, much preferring to get customers to only use their trademark. I think that Wikipedia should resist that pressure. When PF-07321332 is assigned a common name, we should move to using that but meanwhile leave well alone (although redirects are fine, of course). Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

I think you're right; that's exactly my reasoning for moving it back after the initial move. -- The Anome (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

20:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Dear The Anome/Archive 14,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaveravel (talk • contribs) 10:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Twenty years?! Absolutely impressive. One of the few, if not the only legitimate Ultimate Vanguard Editor (or Cardinal Gom, the August Togneme of the Encyclopedia)! Congrats, and keep it up! ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

22:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The article is copy and paste but from my Word document which I use to prepare the text. It is not copy and paste from any other source, though obviously heavily dependent on the official history. Bebington (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

...you blocked User:Kamen rider saber is back! a while back--thanks. Turns out, they tried to create a whole bunch of impersonation accounts (you know, Drm.ies and variations like that), and they are clearly the same person as User:Cum deep 125, who did the same kind of stupid stuff. Looking at these edits, the gorilla thing jogs my memory but I can't remember who that was--but I suspect you do. Is there an SPI? I dropped some blocks, but there's not very much I can do. Thanks for your help, Drmies (talk) 16:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

@Drmies: Hi. I'm afraid I wasn't aware of the context; unfortunately, nothing jogs my memory either, so I can't be much help here. "Is back!" accounts are certainly usually signs of a long-term abuser, but I can't pin it down to any particular SPI. -- The Anome (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

@The Anome I did not see that you had added a citation in Zipper BDSM, and the latest diff I saw was that, you had removed the the maintenance tag, so I thought it to be a vandalism, and reverted it. But when I saw that you had already added a citation, I reverted my edits, and I also reverted the warning that I left on your talk page.

And thanks a bunch for giving me a thank, for my edit. It is the second thank that I received. The first one was from @Th78blue Your thanks means a lot to me. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

21:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Robert George Adams. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 30#Robert George Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Leschnei (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		Awarded for significant contribution to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant page. SpookiePuppy (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! The Anome (talk) 10:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

I was perfectly entitled to put that redirect back as the page was deleted at AFD and the ip created one with no sources at all. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

21:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

I just had an edit clash with some of your changes to this article. I did my best to rebuild a version with both of our changes, but if I missed anything please don't take it personally: it was an accident, not deliberate.--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

HouseOfChange (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi The Anome, hope that you're well. I was wondering if you'd be able to participate in a Signpost interview in your capacity as a contributor to WP:COVID19? I am enthusiastic about these interviews because they help remind other Wikipedians about the passionate and diverse group of volunteers that edit Wikipedia, and into the many discussions and editors that inhabit our space, nooks and crannies. If you had time to even answer a few questions here (User:Tom (LT)/sandbox/WikiProject COVID19 interview draft) I'd be very grateful :). Tom (LT) (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

22:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey, Anome,

I was just stumbling around, looking at various bot reports and found Wikipedia:Database reports/Active editors with the longest-established accounts which states you have been editing Wikipedia for over 20 years! There should be a special barnstar, badge or something but there are only about two dozen recipients who could receive it so maybe it'll take a while to be created.

Congratulations on your longevity! I'm glad Wikipedia has kept your interest. We all benefit from you and your bots' editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

22:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello the Anome, I think my IP is caught up in an anonymous block. While am able to edit on normal wiki interface I can't use any tools such as SW viewer or JWB that I often use daily. What can I do to fix this?--Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 11:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I've added you to the IP Block Exempt group. Please let me know if this helps. -- The Anome (talk) 11:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

It's now working. Thank you Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 11:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I would like my IPBE to be removed since the IP block on my range has expired. I hope I can request it again when needed. Cheers Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 20:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

	Happy New Year The Anome!
	I am grateful for our interactions this year. I am wishing you a happy and prosperous new year. Cheers Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 17:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

A token of thanks Hi The Anome! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Austrian anti-vaccination activists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

I redirected her bio to Asonance as I couldn't find any coverage of her other than about her death from COVID-19. Per BLP1E, we shouldn't have a separate article on her as her death was in itself not a major event. You can add more info to the band's article. Fences&Windows 23:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

@Fences and windows: I've reverted your edit; please see Wikipedia:What BLP1E is not. She is known for two things: her membership of a well-known Czech musical group, and dying for her anti-vax beliefs, something which has achieved global notoriety and world-wide media coverage. I'm really tired of BLP1E being used as a blanket policy to delete articles on anti-vax deaths. Please take it to AFD if you want to delete it. -- The Anome (talk) 07:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Sure thing: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana Horka. I don't know of other cases of anti-vax deaths having articles, I just saw this one and thought it was inappropriate. An analogous list was deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gender reveal party accidents. Fences&Windows 13:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Anomebot2 seems to be malfunctioning; it's adding coordinates with both negative longitudes and "W" longitudes, causing a spurt of entries in Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags. I don't want to shut dowm the bot without giving you a chance to fix this. Deor (talk) 19:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

@Deor: Oh no! Thanks for the heads-up: this is a silly programming error on my part. I have stopped that bot run, and will set the bot to fix all those errors tomorrow morning, so there should be no need to fix them by hand. Fortunately, it looks like only 157 have slipped through so far. -- The Anome (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

OK. You'll have to unblock the bot, which I blocked, since it was continuing with similar edits. (It's also adding overprecise coordinates, apparently getting them from Wikidata, and not adding region codes or location types. I consider that less than optimal) Deor (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

I will unblock the bot, and also roll back the contentious edits, hopefully by tomorrow morning, and I will not add them again until I've got consensus. -- The Anome (talk) 20:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

@Deor:I've removed the tags, thus clearing out Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags; this is not a perfect fix because doing this will have messed with stub notice formatting in some cases, but I will go back and fix that in a separate pass later once I've fixed the tag-remover code. Once that's done, everything should have been restored to its pristine state. -- The Anome (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

@Deor: I've fixed the formatting glitches now, and also reinstated as many of the coord missing tags as I could easily find. I'll take a deeper look later for any remaining data loss from these edits, and either write some code or hand-fix the last of it. -- The Anome (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

OK, thanks for your attention to this. Deor (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

After that I can revisit the new Wikidata coordinate extraction code, and address the issues you've raised regarding precision, type and region tagging. I'll put it up for review before running it again. Sorry about the incovenience, and thanks again for catching the problem before the bot made even more of a mess. -- The Anome (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Lammas is a PAGAN FESTIVAL STOP LYING TO URSELF 105.213.145.58 (talk) 12:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bhadravati(Chandrapur) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Bhadravati(Chandrapur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi The Anome. I wonder could you please restore my recent comment, which seems to have been unwittingly trampled? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

@Martinevans123: I've restored it. Apologies. The edit conflict handling in Mediawiki leaves much to be desired, and sometimes even trashes things when I use the back button to back out of the edit and explicitly ask to make a new edit, instead of preserving the old one. -- The Anome (talk) 12:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks for your quick response! Yes, I know what you mean. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Acmegenesis and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Acmegenesis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

21:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

The article Bust of Leopold II of Belgium, Ghent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable statue does not become notable because it is removed by the council. Although not a biography, WP:ONEEVENT is relevant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

—Brigade Piron (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

19:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Would you mind explaining why you split this article out from Longevity myths? It was merged a couple of years ago (see discussion) for good reason. Cheers! -- Pingumeister^(talk) 12:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

It seemed like a good idea, but I failed to read the talk page. Apologies. I've reverted my edits. -- The Anome (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

EBotsEle^ẞotstalks 03:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

The article Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources that suggest notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––FormalDude talk 10:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

16:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, The Anome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Bishop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Transcendental Meditation® program and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Transcendental Meditation® program until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Renat 16:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sedan(car) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Sedan(car) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

The article Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability since 2011. Very promotional. Zero sources found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lucky Charms® (cereal) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Lucky Charms® (cereal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Osho® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Osho® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Lubianka, Borodianka Raion... An obvious name change is: Lubianka, Bucha Raion, but I am wondering why not the name is not in the format: name, raion, oblast, so it should be: Lubianka, Bucha Raion, Kyiv Oblast. ThWiki1910 (talk) 08:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done, to follow the pattern given in the disambiguation page Lubianka. — The Anome (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

The article Malcolm Sargent Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources and no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 23:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

AusLondonder (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lucky Charms® (cereal) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 3#Lucky Charms® (cereal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 00:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Illegal drug and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Illegal drug until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Illegal drugs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Illegal drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Daman and Diu articles missing geocoordinate data indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

These's a request about a template you just created. Fullprot seems excessive, especially considering none of the other uw templates are full protected. I think Template protection or semi protection should be enough. 67.21.154.193 (talk) 15:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

The article Hi Octane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are primary or not about the show. Given its extremely short life, it likely attracted no attention from media

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: It most certainly has attracted press attention, to the point where people have recently written retrospectives about it, over 25 years after its broadcast. I've added three more WP:RS, and removed the PROD notice. — The Anome (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

02:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:Battle of Kyiv (2022) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Honest query, pal. 49.184.175.53 (talk) 16:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

The more reputable parts of the mainstream press (see WP:RELIABLE), books published by reputable publishers, and film industry magazines that meet WP:RS: see Category:Film magazines by country for an extensive list of film magazines. — The Anome (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

I made a list of characters to possibly add or test there or changes to make. see here. 67.21.154.193 (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll look into it. — The Anome (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)