The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Barkeep49 (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lane Clark & Peacock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Refs are own web-sites and web-site of over-arching group to which it belongs. Significant evidence of past COI editing but currently no evidence of anything notable. Searches yield the usual promotional and review sites plus linkedin etc. but nothing that speaks to notability.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.