Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why.

What are you doing? DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 21:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, try using the {{inuse}} template, because I saw that the page was blank, I tagged it for CSD. --Syed Kazim | Talk 21:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, try using a little discretion. It's not like I was starting the article on The University of Underwater Basketmaking. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 21:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had a reason to tag it for CSD, as I mentioned above. You should have used the {{inuse}} tag. Happy editing! --Syed Kazim | Talk 22:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Kazim, salam! Nimefurahiwa na Kiswahili chako kule kwenye Wikipedia ya Kiswahili - na ningependa kujua meengi kuhusu lugha hii umejifunza wapi na wewe ni mkazi wa wapi! Mimi ni mmoja kati ya wachangiaji wa Wikipedia ile. Na ni bureaucrat kule kwenye Kiswahili. Pia, mmoja kati ya wenyekukutakia kheri ya maisha! Basi natumai nitajibiwa! Kila la kheri, kaka.--_{Mwanaharakati}^(Longa) 10:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahsante sana kwa maneno haya mazuri. Ninaishi Dar... hapa kwetu bongo. Nitapenda kuichangia Wikipedia ile... siku moja nitajaribu akipenda Mungu. Nakutakia njema! --Syed Kazim | Talk 14:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syed, salam. Eti na mimi ninaishi Dar, pale katika jiji la wajanja wa Bongo. Je, ungependa siku moja tuonane? Ukiona inafaa, basi tuwasiliane! Ili tujivunie Wanawikipedia sisi wa Dar es Salaam. Shalom.--_{Mwanaharakati}^(Longa) 06:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mungu akipenda tutakutana siku moja. Kwaheri kaka. --Syed Kazim | Talk 14:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CN Real, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no third party sourcing - Wikipedia WP:NOT an advert

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just tagged the article. Have no contributions to it. --Syed Kazim | Talk 12:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK - i had just left the tag on all registered account who had made any edits. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay. Happy Editing!

I will stop vandalizing if you admit that the religious right isn't racist. Liberals stereotype it that way but those freedom hating moralisti-cunts are the most anti-White people on Earth. 1488aryanpride (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place to put forward your opinions. --Syed Kazim | Talk 16:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syed Kazim! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 13:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thanks. --Syed Kazim | Talk 13:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have quite a few references, and Careless (or Carlos or Carlis) is already mentioned in two Wikipedia articles - Royal Oak and "Charles II escape after Worcester" - don't remember the exact title. I always compose on page - unfortunately.

Regards' Urselius (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For my reference: This is a continuation of User_talk:Urselius#William_Careless_.28Carlos.29.

Oh, okay. Just use the {{inuse}} tag next time. Alternatively, you could write out an article in your user-space and then move it when you are satisfied. Either way is fine. Thanks for your contributions. Happy Editing! --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now more-or-less finished.Urselius (talk) 11:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I have removed the tags.--Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 14:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I responded back on the DYK. Also I was thinking of achiving my talk page but I find it easier like it is now. Spongie555 (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For my reference: This is a continuation of User_talk:Spongie555#DYK_nomination_of_Constitution_of_Bhutan and User_talk:Spongie555#Archive

I answered the query on the DYK talk page. If you find that not archiving is easier, keep it that way. It's your talk-page after all. :) --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The alt is fine for the nomination. Spongie555 (talk) 03:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Maybe you could add the {{subst:DYKtick}} template. Because I proposed the alternate, I should not confirm that it is ready. --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Hello. Thanks for taking the time to respond. I have various scripts in my monobook.js but they don't seem to work. I've bypassed my browser's cache quite a few times to no avail. These scripts used to work before. I'm using Firefox 3.6.13. Any suggestions? --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 17:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that you are using Monobook? If not select appearance in my preferences and select Monobook. →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 17:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am using the Monobook appearance. Anything else I should check? --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 17:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cancelled the 'helpme' - Syed Kazim, you don't need to use 'helpme' when talking directly to another user on their talk page. 'Helpme' gets the attention of any helper. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  17:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should have clarified. I have the Monobook preference selected in my preferences, but the scripts still do not work. So the problem is not exactly solved. I have added {{helpme}} again. My apologies for not being clearer earlier. :) --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 17:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what else you could do. I suppose you should make sure you are bypassing your cache correctly. →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 17:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just did it again according to the instructions at the link you provided. The scripts still don't work. :| Any other suggestions? --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 17:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lot of scripts you are running. Are you sure they all work OK? Have you just imported them from other users? - some scripts won't run that way, you need to use an import script routine. FF can be fussy, one wrong bit of code and it ignores the rest. I suggest blank that lot out (it's saved in the history) and replace with just

//Highlight Admins
importScript('User:Ais523/adminrights.js');

(Don't get the script from that page - it won't work that way) By pass the cache and look at the history of this talk page, any admin will be shown in a blue background. If that works then just re-add your old scripts one at a time, and test.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I would add to that is...sometimes, you have to use 'trial and error'. One script could cause the others to all fail. First, I would remove everything from the page, and put just one simple line there. For example, try just this one;

Do the advised refresh/reload to bypass your cache, then go to any article page and see if, on the left, in the 'toolbox' part you have the option to calculate Page size. If you do, that shows that scripts can work. If you don't, you have a very odd problem.

If that one does work (which is likely), try adding just one more script that you want - and see if that works. Build up that way, and see what makes it all go wrong.

If it fails to work, try rebooting.

Please reinstate the 'helpme' if you need more. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  18:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added the script Ronhjones suggested and it works. Must be one of the scripts which is causing the problem. I'll try putting them back in one at a time. Thank you Ronhjones, Chzz and Gfoley4 for your help! --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 18:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.

We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.

We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Baba Guru Nanak University			Princes of Wales family tree
	Gurdwara Nanak Shahi			Arvīds Pelše
	Marion Harding High School (Ohio)			Battle of Waterloo
	Mercenaries in India		Merge
	Lynbrook Senior High School			Force Z
	Pierre Chareau			Sikh
	Burntisland railway station			Norton Personal Firewall
	Candolim		Add sources
	Affinity, West Virginia			Honours of the Principality of Wales
	Packsville, West Virginia			Big Stick, West Virginia
	East Union High School			Hussein Nasser Walji
	Besoco, West Virginia		Wikify
	West Mesquite High School			Mount St Mary's School, India
	Artie, West Virginia			Tulpar (Almaty Metro)
	Gabriel Péri			Hazara people
	Midway, Raleigh County, West Virginia		Expand
	Shaun Gladwell			Index of Tanzania-related articles
	Fireco, West Virginia			Cotter family
	Sikh Pilgrimage to Pakistan			2011 Oregon Ducks football team

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Mead, West Virginia			Sikhism
	Cranberry, West Virginia			New World Order (professional wrestling)
	Dry Creek, West Virginia			Statutory declaration
	HC Oceláři Třinec		Merge
	Edvard Lasota			Roddy Piper
	McVey, West Virginia			Florida and the Declaration of Independence
	MV Empire MacAlpine			Piper's Pit
	Winding Gulf, West Virginia		Add sources
	Storm King School			Rai Bhoe Bhatti
	Ernest Roeber			Chennai Public School
	Colcord, West Virginia			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Naoma, West Virginia		Wikify
	Coronet of Frederick, Prince of Wales			Ugandan English
	Dorothy, West Virginia			Ministry of Railways (Soviet Union)
	Skelton, West Virginia			Zhibek Zholy (Almaty Metro)
	Clear Lake High School (Clear Lake, Iowa)		Expand
	Tamworth Public School			Gilbert Carter High School
	Lillybrook, West Virginia			Hindu texts
	Bolt, West Virginia			1755 in Wales

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Fairdale, West Virginia			Jake Roberts
	Prince of Wales Prize for Municipal Heritage Leadership			Walter Reuther Central High School
	Pemberton, West Virginia			Raith Rovers F.C.
	Andy MacPhail		Merge
	Killarney, West Virginia			Dastar
	Sprague, West Virginia			Kaam
	Manav Sthali School			Prince Alexander John of Wales
	Ury, West Virginia		Add sources
	Rossend Castle			Muhammad Bilal Khan
	Willibet, West Virginia			Sting (wrestler)
	La Brea Avenue			Mara Junior Science College Kuching
	Terry, West Virginia		Wikify
	Algerian cuisine			VKV Shergaon
	Bilal Aziz Özer			Vand Chhako
	Tyson Research Center			Extended Secondary School
	Global Green USA		Expand
	Capital of Wales			Comodo Internet Security
	National Institute of Agricultural Botany			Elections in Africa
	Marfork, West Virginia			Culture of Niger

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Dera Baba Nanak			Dmitriy Ustinov
	Stickney, West Virginia			Propellant depot
	Sierra High School, Manteca, California			PF (firewall)
	Sirius XM Love		Merge
	Pickshin, West Virginia			History of the Punjab
	Clear Creek, West Virginia			Kerio Technologies
	Corrected d-exponent			Guru Granth Sahib
	Tamworth High School		Add sources
	Challenger School			The British School, Panchkula
	Jefferson Davis Community College			Quick (dance group)
	Cool Ridge, West Virginia			Odd, West Virginia
	Sullivan, Raleigh County, West Virginia		Wikify
	Blue Jay 6, West Virginia			Hujja
	Pinepoca, West Virginia			Tandlianwala
	Westmont Hilltop School District			Sultanate of Egypt
	Denilson Martins Nascimento		Expand
	Saxon, West Virginia			2011 Spanish protests
	Josephine, West Virginia			Culture of Algeria
	Edison High School (Stockton, California)			1751 in Wales

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Coronet of George, Prince of Wales			Iptables
	Charles M. Blalack Middle School			Nikolai Podgorny
	Soak Creek, West Virginia			Culture of Côte d'Ivoire
	Hot Coal, West Virginia		Merge
	Ted Polk Middle School			Wisconsin Lutheran School
	Prince of Wales Hotel			PC Tools (company)
	Mata Tripta			List of Dr. Steve-O episodes
	Stonecoal Junction, West Virginia		Add sources
	McAlpin, Raleigh County, West Virginia			Nikita Koloff
	Woodpeck, West Virginia			Coronet of Charles, Prince of Wales
	Haggard Middle School			Selma High School (Selma, California)
	Glen Morgan, West Virginia		Wikify
	Crow, West Virginia			Godhra train burning
	Vivian Field Middle School			Life of Guru Nanak through Pictures
	Bragg, West Virginia			BTC-T MG ZS EX259
	Lego, West Virginia		Expand
	St. Joseph's Convent School, Sagar			Elections in Djibouti
	The Frank Anthony Public School, New Delhi			1754 in Wales
	Delta High School (Clarksburg, California)			Bilal Philips

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Packsville, West Virginia			Big Show and Kane
	Affinity, West Virginia			Princes of Wales family tree
	Lynbrook Senior High School			Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Convent Secondary School
	Baba Guru Nanak University		Merge
	Besoco, West Virginia			Force Z
	Abney, West Virginia			Norton Personal Firewall
	Midway, Raleigh County, West Virginia			Miqdad ibn Aswad
	West Mesquite High School		Add sources
	Blue Jay, West Virginia			Big Stick, West Virginia
	Solar roadway			Boris Ponomarev
	Sikh Pilgrimage to Pakistan			Honours of the Principality of Wales
	East Union High School		Wikify
	Bob Lutz (American football)			Tulpar (Almaty Metro)
	Gurdwara Nanak Shahi			Don Callis
	Eccles, West Virginia			Kara (Sikhism)
	Burntisland railway station		Expand
	Fireco, West Virginia			Ironton, Ohio
	Marion Harding High School (Ohio)			Index of Tanzania-related articles
	Artie, West Virginia			Timeline of Tanzanian history

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover | Feature | News and announcements | Humor | Want ads To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Telkom Kenya			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Dugout, West Virginia			Culture of Cameroon
	Tilden, West Virginia			Sikhism in Thailand
	Professional school		Merge
	Findlay City School District			Usul al-fiqh
	Mitchell School			President
	Switch (2013 film)			Piper's Pit
	Epperly, West Virginia		Add sources
	Torrington Public Schools			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Terry Junction, West Virginia			Mike Graham (wrestler)
	Jap, West Virginia			Paul Jones (wrestler)
	Bob, West Virginia		Wikify
	Brent Stait			Mani Sharma
	Dameron, West Virginia			Cicero Public School District 99
	Dar es Salaam Region			Eritrean Postal Service
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)		Expand
	Sweeneyburg, West Virginia			Politics of Tanzania
	University of East Africa			List of schools in Cornwall
	Holbæk Municipality			List of schools in Swindon

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Peachtree, West Virginia			Culture of Cameroon
	Holbæk Municipality			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Riley, West Virginia			Sikhism in Thailand
	Zada, West Virginia		Merge
	Hoohoo, Raleigh County, West Virginia			President
	Torrington Public Schools			United Nations General Assembly
	Switch (2013 film)			Usul al-fiqh
	Findlay City School District		Add sources
	Redbird, West Virginia			Twelver
	Telkom Kenya			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Masseyville, West Virginia			Ruskin Bond
	Maple Meadow, West Virginia		Wikify
	Circle View, West Virginia			Cicero Public School District 99
	Tolleys, West Virginia			Aloha High School
	Millbrae School District			Mani Sharma
	Professional school		Expand
	Warden, West Virginia			Beaver, West Virginia
	Tomah Area School District			Turban
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)			Delegate (United States Congress)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

1. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
2. Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
3. Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

• Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
• Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
• Muboshgu (submissions) and Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
• Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Telkom Kenya			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)			Culture of Cameroon
	Millbrae School District			Oregon City High School
	Professional school		Merge
	Holbæk Municipality			President
	Tomah Area School District			Adi Granth
	Peachtree, West Virginia			United Nations General Assembly
	Findlay City School District		Add sources
	Brandon School Division			Ruskin Bond
	Jamam			Turban
	Hoohoo, Raleigh County, West Virginia			Twelver
	Brunswick City School District		Wikify
	Zada, West Virginia			Cicero Public School District 99
	Mitchell School			Aloha High School
	Tolleys, West Virginia			Rex Putnam High School
	Circle View, West Virginia		Expand
	Torrington Public Schools			Beaver, West Virginia
	Leyton High School			Elections in the Gambia
	Switch (2013 film)			Elections in Comoros

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Maple Fork, West Virginia			Sclerocarya birrea
	Jarrolds Valley, West Virginia			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Holbæk Municipality			Oregon City High School
	Telkom Kenya		Merge
	Pettry Bottom, West Virginia			Adi Granth
	Findlay City School District			Usul al-fiqh
	Alex Prud'homme			President
	Switch (2013 film)		Add sources
	Prosperity, Raleigh County, West Virginia			Ruskin Bond
	Professional school			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Emerson, West Virginia			Rachelle Walker
	Norvelle, West Virginia		Wikify
	Rodes, West Virginia			Eritrean Postal Service
	Dry Hill, West Virginia			Culture of Cameroon
	Mitchell School			Cicero Public School District 99
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)		Expand
	Posey, West Virginia			Politics of Tanzania
	Beckley Junction, West Virginia			Beaver, West Virginia
	Jamam			List of schools in Cornwall

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Telkom Kenya			Culture of Cameroon
	Jenny Gap, West Virginia			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Tomah Area School District			Oregon City High School
	Switch (2013 film)		Merge
	Stover, West Virginia			Adi Granth
	Brandon School Division			President
	Bone Lick, West Virginia			Usul al-fiqh
	Findlay City School District		Add sources
	Brunswick City School District			Ruskin Bond
	Professional school			Twelver
	Mitchell School			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Johnstown, West Virginia		Wikify
	Matville, West Virginia			Cicero Public School District 99
	Hamlet, West Virginia			Eritrean Postal Service
	Trap Hill, West Virginia			Shia view of Ali
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)		Expand
	Torrington Public Schools			Politics of Tanzania
	Leyton High School			Beaver, West Virginia
	Holbæk Municipality			National Assembly (Niger)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Telkom Kenya			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Hamlet, West Virginia			Julius Nyerere
	Table Rock, West Virginia			Culture of Cameroon
	Friendly View, West Virginia		Merge
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)			President
	Mitchell School			Islamic schools and branches
	Bone Lick, West Virginia			Khanda (Sikh symbol)
	Johnstown, West Virginia		Add sources
	Torrington Public Schools			Salvadoran Army
	Professional school			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Holbæk Municipality			Twelver
	Millbrae School District		Wikify
	Matville, West Virginia			Cicero Public School District 99
	Trap Hill, West Virginia			Eritrean Postal Service
	Tomah Area School District			Sikhism in Thailand
	Jenny Gap, West Virginia		Expand
	Findlay City School District			Politics of Tanzania
	White Stick, West Virginia			List of schools in Cornwall
	Stover, West Virginia			Beaver, West Virginia

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Telkom Kenya			Automake
	Bone Lick, West Virginia			Julius Nyerere
	Hamlet, West Virginia			Culture of Cameroon
	David Shaff		Merge
	Matville, West Virginia			Khanda (Sikh symbol)
	Jiangnan High School			President
	Friendly View, West Virginia			Islamic schools and branches
	Jenny Gap, West Virginia		Add sources
	Johnstown, West Virginia			GNU Debugger
	Professional school			Glade Springs, West Virginia
	Findlay City School District			Paul Jones (wrestler)
	Trap Hill, West Virginia		Wikify
	Lebowa			Royal families of the United Arab Emirates
	Stover, West Virginia			Aloha High School
	Millbrae School District			Rex Putnam High School
	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon)		Expand
	Mitchell School			Politics of Tanzania
	Tomah Area School District			Beaver, West Virginia
	Holbæk Municipality			List of schools in Cornwall

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Syed Kazim! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Syed! I'm so happy to see you signed up to join the project - welcome. You can dive into our to-do lists here. There is tons of military history! Be sure to watchlist your favorites, as they will continue to grow as new content gets added to the WDL website. Also, you can always search the WDL website for something that you're interested in. And be sure to share your outcomes here. If I can help with anything just ask and welcome aboard! SarahStierch (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sarah! Thanks for the warm welcome. :) I've already looked at a few items on the to-do list and seen several things that I'd love to work on. Thanks for inviting me. --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 21:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Syed Kazim! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
420		Twelver (talk)						Add sources
151		GNU Debugger (talk)						Add sources
73		Salvadoran Army (talk)						Add sources
495		Barry Windham (talk)						Add sources
197		Alex Wright (talk)						Add sources
129		Glenn Gilbertti (talk)						Add sources
762		The Devil's Rejects (talk)						Cleanup
373		Paul Orndorff (talk)						Cleanup
36		Culture of Cameroon (talk)						Cleanup
75		Politics of Tanzania (talk)						Expand
13		Beaver, West Virginia (talk)						Expand
5		National Assembly (Niger) (talk)						Expand
370		PeerGuardian (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
176		Computer appliance (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
433		United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
867		President (talk)						Merge
185		Khanda (Sikh symbol) (talk)						Merge
663		Islamic schools and branches (talk)						Merge
51		Automake (talk)						Wikify
110		Royal families of the United Arab Emirates (talk)						Wikify
443		Julius Nyerere (talk)						Wikify
1		Torrington Public Schools (talk)						Orphan
0		Penn Harris Madison Schools (talk)						Orphan
8		WHO regions (talk)						Orphan
1		Leevale, West Virginia (talk)						Stub
66		Professional school (talk)						Stub
3		Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon) (talk)						Stub
16		Telkom Kenya (talk)						Stub
2		Cirtsville, West Virginia (talk)						Stub
1		Terry Junction, West Virginia (talk)						Stub

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
444		Twelver (talk)						Add sources
153		GNU Debugger (talk)						Add sources
13		First Republic Bank Corporation (talk)						Add sources
4		Glade Springs, West Virginia (talk)						Add sources
521		Barry Windham (talk)						Add sources
85		Paul Jones (wrestler) (talk)						Add sources
355		Paul Orndorff (talk)						Cleanup
724		The Devil's Rejects (talk)						Cleanup
53		Automake (talk)						Cleanup
73		SAREB (talk)						Expand
15		Beaver, West Virginia (talk)						Expand
75		Politics of Tanzania (talk)						Expand
344		PeerGuardian (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
371		United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
188		Computer appliance (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
889		President (talk)						Merge
204		Khanda (Sikh symbol) (talk)						Merge
22		Colossal Connection (talk)						Merge
97		Royal families of the United Arab Emirates (talk)						Wikify
404		Julius Nyerere (talk)						Wikify
1		Eritrean Postal Service (talk)						Wikify
1		Torrington Public Schools (talk)						Orphan
0		Penn Harris Madison Schools (talk)						Orphan
7		WHO regions (talk)						Orphan
18		Telkom Kenya (talk)						Stub
2		Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon) (talk)						Stub
19		Hua Xia Bank (talk)						Stub
54		Professional school (talk)						Stub
5		Holbæk Municipality (talk)						Stub
1		Terry Junction, West Virginia (talk)						Stub

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
4		Glade Springs, West Virginia (talk)						Add sources
6		National Legislature (Sudan) (talk)						Add sources
7		National Assembly (Chad) (talk)						Add sources
80		Paul Jones (wrestler) (talk)						Add sources
534		Twelver (talk)						Add sources
513		Barry Windham (talk)						Add sources
395		Paul Orndorff (talk)						Cleanup
28		Culture of Cameroon (talk)						Cleanup
55		Politics of Sudan (talk)						Cleanup
76		Politics of Tanzania (talk)						Expand
1		Jiangnan High School (talk)						Expand
17		Beaver, West Virginia (talk)						Expand
374		PeerGuardian (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
180		Computer appliance (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
353		United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
208		Khanda (Sikh symbol) (talk)						Merge
899		President (talk)						Merge
24		Colossal Connection (talk)						Merge
2		Eritrean Postal Service (talk)						Wikify
98		Royal families of the United Arab Emirates (talk)						Wikify
49		Automake (talk)						Wikify
7		CARPHA (talk)						Orphan
1		Torrington Public Schools (talk)						Orphan
1		Penn Harris Madison Schools (talk)						Orphan
18		Telkom Kenya (talk)						Stub
17		January Makamba (talk)						Stub
3		Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon) (talk)						Stub
62		Professional school (talk)						Stub
22		Hua Xia Bank (talk)						Stub
8		Holbæk Municipality (talk)						Stub

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Syed Kazim! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:

• We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
• Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
• WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
• Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.

Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, Casliber (submissions) and Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Piotrus (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

1. Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
2. Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
3. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
4. Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
5. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
6. Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
7. Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
8. Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 06:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Sasata (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:28, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

1. Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
2. Hawkeye7 (submissions)
3. Sasata (submissions)
4. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions)
5. Casliber (submissions)
6. Adam Cuerden (submissions)
7. Miyagawa (submissions)
8. Piotrus (submissions)
9. Ealdgyth (submissions)

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

• Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
• Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
• Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
• Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
• Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
• The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
• Finally, the judges are awarding Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 01:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• 12george1 (submissions) and TropicalAnalystwx13 (submissions) were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
• WonderBoy1998 (submissions) scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Wikipedia:Featured topics/She Wolf.
• TheAustinMan (submissions) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
• Igordebraga (submissions) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
2. Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
3. WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

• Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
• Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's #switch: ChrisGualtieri who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, tiger from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 and The Lion King from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5. We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5.

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User Template:User and Template:User 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

1. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
2. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
3. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
4. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
5. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
6. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
7. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
8. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User Template:User and Template:User 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User Template:User and Template:User 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Kindly help me by providing some details about family of Ayatollah Taqi Bahjat i.e. his wife and kids. Provision of this info will serve as legacy of the personality at his page. Thanks Nannadeem (talk) 03:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salaam. I just came across this. Do you still need this information? --Syed Kazim ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:27, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

W A. Thanks, yes I still need for the said Article. Nannadeem (talk) 18:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5, WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the prize for fourth place
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins a final 8 prize.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins a final 8 prize.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins a final 8 prize.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User Template:User and Template:User 22:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.

• We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
• In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
• The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Template:User, Template:User and Template:User
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant5 had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4 led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
• And last but not least, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User4, Template:User4 and Template:User4

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Template:U through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Template:User4, Template:User4 and Template:User4 16:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
formatnum:88	Template:Hs	Tanzania People's Defence Force (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:2992	Template:Hs	Tanzania (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:5	Template:Hs	Office de la poste guinéenne (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:12	Template:Hs	Dorothea Flock (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:44	Template:Hs	Healthcare in Tanzania (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:76	Template:Hs	Politics of Tanzania (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:31	Template:Hs	VirusBlokAda (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Oldham County Schools (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:32	Template:Hs	Vba32 AntiVirus (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:48	Template:Hs	Heglig Crisis (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:73	Template:Hs	Laryngeal theory (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:21	Template:Hs	Subdivisions of Tanzania (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:149	Template:Hs	History of Tanzania (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:579	Template:Hs	Guru (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:803	Template:Hs	Decolonization (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:8	Template:Hs	University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Coast Forensic League (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:5	Template:Hs	Dolph Briscoe Jr. Library (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:24	Template:Hs	Bhai Mani Singh (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:33	Template:Hs	Culture of Cameroon (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:85	Template:Hs	Priest hole (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Torrington Public Schools (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Burntisland and District Pipe Band (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Penn Harris Madison Schools (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:18	Template:Hs	Telkom Kenya (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	Wheeler High School (Fossil, Oregon) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	Direction des services postaux de l'Office National des Postes et de l'Épargne (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:32	Template:Hs	Chadema (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:28	Template:Hs	Tanzania Naval Command (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:6	Template:Hs	Algérie Poste (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
formatnum:54	Template:Hs	George Lilanga (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:27	Template:Hs	Egypt Post (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:481	Template:Hs	HAL AMCA (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:19	Template:Hs	South African Post Office (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:24	Template:Hs	Mudiad Amddiffyn Cymru (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:2142	Template:Hs	East Germany (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:213	Template:Hs	Paul Orndorff (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	Hope School District (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:149	Template:Hs	Royal families of the United Arab Emirates (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:155	Template:Hs	Aladin (film) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:47	Template:Hs	WWA World Heavyweight Championship (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:2059	Template:Hs	Austria-Hungary (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:44	Template:Hs	Ismah (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:5	Template:Hs	Warrenton High School (Oregon) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:630	Template:Hs	Five-year plans for the national economy of the Soviet Union (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio School of Health Professions (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:30	Template:Hs	Foreign relations of Eritrea (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:13	Template:Hs	Writers of Guru Granth Sahib (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:39	Template:Hs	Sukayna bint Husayn (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:6	Template:Hs	Whittier City School District (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:38	Template:Hs	University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	St Ann's English Medium School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Schools in Comilla (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Elizabeth Nkunda Batenga (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:12	Template:Hs	Holbæk Municipality (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	La Poste (Ivory Coast) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:14	Template:Hs	Samuel Sitta (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:60	Template:Hs	Professional school (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Mauritanian Post Company (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:7	Template:Hs	Tanzania Posts Corporation (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
formatnum:277	Template:Hs	Barry Windham (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:220	Template:Hs	The Four Horsemen (professional wrestling) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:659	Template:Hs	President (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:8	Template:Hs	Nehemiah Tamari (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:5	Template:Hs	Kirkcaldy RFC (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:74	Template:Hs	GFI Software (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:9	Template:Hs	Northwestern University Dental School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:26	Template:Hs	Bektashism and folk religion (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:318	Template:Hs	Unicameralism (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:50	Template:Hs	Intego (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	Corbett School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:46	Template:Hs	Kadhimiya (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:79	Template:Hs	Islam and war (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:7300	Template:Hs	Rohingya people (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:98	Template:Hs	Professional wrestling championship (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:41	Template:Hs	Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:5282	Template:Hs	Anti-spam techniques (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:946	Template:Hs	Volkswagen Type 2 (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:192	Template:Hs	Internet café (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:91	Template:Hs	Investiture (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:22	Template:Hs	Sikhism in Thailand (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Admiralty Peak (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	American Revolutionary War Campaigns (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Ankeniheny-Zahamena Reserve (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	Hum Bhi Insaan Hain (1948 film) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:10	Template:Hs	Vidya (film) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:11	Template:Hs	Milap (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:5	Template:Hs	Mitchell School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:8	Template:Hs	CAMPOST (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Westhill Primary (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
formatnum:230	Template:Hs	Bilal Ibn Rabah (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:37	Template:Hs	Undeclared war (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:575	Template:Hs	Ravana (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:116	Template:Hs	Panzerlied (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:187	Template:Hs	Free State of Prussia (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Hazel Park Schools (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:18	Template:Hs	State Council of Crimea (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:135	Template:Hs	Halifax (former city) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:238	Template:Hs	USS Intrepid (CV-11) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:5	Template:Hs	Anacortes School District (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Vale High School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:43	Template:Hs	Territory (geographic region) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:325	Template:Hs	Twelver (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:597	Template:Hs	Ali al-Ridha (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:113	Template:Hs	Ravidas (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:41	Template:Hs	University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:110	Template:Hs	Regalia (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:126	Template:Hs	Mawlid (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Hillsborough City School District (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Madison Southern High School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:27	Template:Hs	Maritime history of California (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Antonio Soldini (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Amine Amamou (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Agnes Addison (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Correios de Angola (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:20	Template:Hs	Ittefaq (1969 film) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Howden School (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:17	Template:Hs	Sawan Ki Ghata (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Millbrae School District (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Eritrean Postal Service (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
formatnum:11	Template:Hs	White Tanzanians (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:102	Template:Hs	Abd-al-Rahman ibn Muljam (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:343	Template:Hs	United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:6	Template:Hs	National Assembly (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:343	Template:Hs	Urination (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:517	Template:Hs	Guru Gobind Singh (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Add sources
formatnum:131	Template:Hs	Cobb County, Georgia (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:72	Template:Hs	Political status of Western Sahara (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:905	Template:Hs	Japanese cuisine (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Cleanup
formatnum:11	Template:Hs	Index of Tanzania-related articles (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:6	Template:Hs	Timeline of Tanzanian history (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:61	Template:Hs	Territory (subdivision) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Expand
formatnum:10	Template:Hs	University of Adelaide School of Dentistry (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:99	Template:Hs	PeerGuardian (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:899	Template:Hs	Soviet–Afghan War (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Unencyclopaedic
formatnum:10	Template:Hs	United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:1387	Template:Hs	Réunion (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:155	Template:Hs	Russian political jokes (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Merge
formatnum:329	Template:Hs	Self-determination (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:478	Template:Hs	United States Football League (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:4	Template:Hs	Bhai Vir Singh bibliography (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Wikify
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Hussein Nasser Walji (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:1	Template:Hs	Lyubov Zakharchenko (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:0	Template:Hs	Andkær (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Orphan
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Paositra Malagasy (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:74	Template:Hs	Dama Dam Mast Qalandar (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Correios de Cabo Verde (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:25	Template:Hs	Tafsir al-Mizan (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:2	Template:Hs	Muhammad ibn Khwand (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub
formatnum:3	Template:Hs	Hasan Naqvi (talk)	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Template:Hs	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant3 in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

1. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
2. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
3. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
4. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
5. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
6. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
7. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
8. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

Template:User, Template:User and Template:User 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6. All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6, a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6. Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins the prize for fourth place
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins a final 8 prize.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins a final 8 prize.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant6 wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Template:User3, Template:User3 and Template:User3 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, and two each by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7. Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7. Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Template:User4, Template:User4, and Template:User4 --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Template:User4, Template:User4, and Template:User4.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and one by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7), four Featured Lists (with three by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7), and 53 Good Articles (six by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and five each by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and five by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 scored 265 base points, while Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Template:User4, Template:User4, and Template:User4 -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:

• First Place - Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7
• Second Place -Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7
• Third Place - Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

• Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
• Good Article – MPJ-DK had 14 GAs promoted in R3.
• Featured List – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 produced 2 FLs in R2
• Featured Pictures – Adam Cuerden restored 18 images to FP status in R4.
• Featured Portal – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2.
• Featured Topic – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively.
• Good Topic – MPJ-DK created a GT with 9 GAs in R5.
• Did You Know – MPJ-DK put 53 DYKs on the main page in R4.
• In The News – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7, each with 5 ITN, both in R4.
• Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.

Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User4, Template:User4, and Template:User4

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time. The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from Template:Noping, Template:Noping, Template:Noping, Template:Noping, and Template:Noping. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out. Template:Center

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.

For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):

• First place – $200
• Second & Third place – $50 each
• Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.

Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address.

After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.

The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are Template:User4, Template:User, and Template:User4.

Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
• Template:Flagicon Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
• Template:Flagicon 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
• Template:Flagicon Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
• Template:Flagicon 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
• Template:Flagicon Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
• Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

• First Place - Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8
• Second Place -Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8
• Third Place - Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

• Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
• Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
• Featured List – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8 both produced 2 FLs in R2
• Featured Pictures – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8 improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
• Featured Topic – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8 has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
• Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
• Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
• In The News – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8 had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
• Good Article Review – Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant8 completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - Template:Reply to please send Template:User4 an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User4, Template:User4, and Template:User4 MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Template:User4, Template:User4 and Template:User4. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

• Template:Flagicon Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
• Template:Flagicon FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
• Template:Flagicon Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
• Template:Flagicon Ceranthor, Template:Flagicon Numerounovedant, Template:Flagicon Carbrera, Template:Flagicon Farang Rak Tham and Template:Flagicon Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
• Template:Flagicon Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
• Template:Flagicon Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
• Template:Flagicon SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
• Template:Flagicon Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
• Template:Flagicon Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
• Template:Flagicon Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Template:Flagicon Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
• Template:Flagicon SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

• Template:Flagicon Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
• Template:Flagicon Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
• Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Template:Flagicon Nova Crystallis, Template:Flagicon Iazyges, Template:Flagicon SounderBruce, Template:Flagicon Kosack and Template:Flagicon Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivmbox

Template:Ivmbox

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9, who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

1. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
2. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
3. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
4. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
5. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
6. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
7. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9
8. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9

All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9 wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Template:User4, Template:User4, Template:User4 and Template:User4.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Syed Kazim, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Template:Resize

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Template:User4, Template:User4, Template:User4 and Template:User4. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly invited you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Template:Flagicon L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
• Template:U, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
• Template:Flagicon MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
• Template:Flagicon Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
• Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
• Template:Flagicon Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

Dear Syed Kazim, I noticed your name was under the participants' list of WikiProject United Nations. I wanted to invite you to contribute to the advancement of this project. Here's how you can do so: 1. Select the latest CC BY SA publications for which no articles have been created yet available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_Nations/Open_Access_text/Education_publications 2. Follow the instructions available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Adding_open_license_text_to_Wikipedia 3. Add the text to Wikipedia (either by creating new articles or adding content to existing ones). Since these are available under CC BY SA, you can copy/paste content and/or edit if need be. 4. Attribute the text using the 'Free-content attribution' template in the 'Sources' section. 5. Add your contribution in the table here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_Nations/Open_Access_text/Education_publications Don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions! Looking forward to working with you on enriching Wikipedia, one article at a time:)! C.recalde   — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.recalde (talk • contribs) 10:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
• Template:Flagicon Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
• Template:U (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
• Template:Flagicon Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Template:Flagicon Barkeep49 with six GAs, Template:Flagicon Ceranthor, Template:Flagicon Lee Vilenski, and Template:Flagicon Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Template:Flagicon MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Template:Flagicon Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
• Template:Flagicon Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
• Template:Flagicon SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
• Template:Flagicon Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivmbox

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10, who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

1. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 964 points
2. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 899 points
3. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 817 points
4. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 691 points
5. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 388 points
6. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 146 points
7. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 145 points
8. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the good article prize, for 14 GAs in round 5.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the featured list prize, for 4 FLs overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the featured picture prize, for 91 FPs overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the topic prize, for 7 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the DYK prize, for 14 did you know articles in round 5.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Template:User4, Template:User4, Template:User4 and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Template:Flagicon Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
• Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
• Template:Flagicon Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
• Template:Flagicon Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
• CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
• The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included Template:Flagicon L293D, Template:Flagicon Kingsif, Template:Flagicon Enwebb, Template:Flagicon Lee Vilenski and Template:Flagicon CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; Template:Flagicon L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Template:Flagicon Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

• Template:Flagicon Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
• Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
• Template:Flagicon The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
• Template:Flagicon Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
• Template:Flagicon Lee Vilenski with 869 points, Hog Farm with 801, Template:Flagicon Kingsif with 719, Template:Flagicon SounderBruce with 710, Template:Flagicon Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and Template:Flagicon MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Template:Flagicon Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
• Template:Flagicon The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
• Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, Template:Flagicon MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
• Template:FlagiconHaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
• Template:Flagicon Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivmbox

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11, the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11. In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11, Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11. The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
• Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivmbox You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Template:User4 and Template:User4. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Template:Flagicon Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
• Template:Flagicon Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• Template:Flagicon ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
• Template:Flagicon Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
• Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
• Template:Flagicon The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
• Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
• Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
• Template:Flagicon Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
• Template:Flagicon Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

• Template:Flagicon The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
• Template:Flagicon Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Template:Flagicon Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
• Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
• Template:Flagicon Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
• Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
• Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Syed Kazim! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 2 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivmbox

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Template:Ivmbox You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list