Hello, Pilikanig!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Austronesier. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Philippines have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 04:55, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Languages of Indonesia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 18:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Languages of the Philippines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 04:20, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is promising -- but the sections on phonology and grammar are unreferenced. (And the list of references includes nothing that looks as if it would be about phonology or grammar -- though I confess that I haven't clicked on any of the links and looked for myself.) This, and nothing I write below, is my reason for declining the submission.

Thank you for supplying DOIs for the references that you do provide. Clicking on the DOI takes the reader to the publisher's web page (usually). There's no need to supply the URL of such a web page when you also provide the DOI -- the DOI will do the job (and is more proof against link rot).

By a "particle added as a suffix", do you mean an enclitic?

Remember, "declining" is not rejecting. I hope to see this draft improved, resubmitted, and promoted to article status.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bahasapil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pilikanig! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bahasapil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Filipinos, you may be blocked from editing. Austronesier (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of the information is false, there is plenty of poorly sourced content in all articles and therefore it is unfair to single out me, this is clearly a personal attack, as I’ve noticed you’ve removed all my edits on other pages. Clearly, you cannot be bothered to research the true information which I post, as I’ve said although content can be poorly sourced, that doesn’t discredit the truth behind the content but rather its reliability. The correct action to have taken is to ask me to provide sources content not to remove edits which only require a mere google search confirm. Thank you, dalám atakan besilap. Pilikanig (talk) 14:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]