Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Hello John F. Lewis. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

— Revi 15:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

.

It has been so long! How are you? — Yash ^[talk] 06:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

@Yash!: I'm great, nice to see you again. We should probably catch up in more detail via email or something! :) John F. Lewis (talk) 19:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For your valuable help for me in IRC accounts :) JAaron95 (Talk) 13:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi John, I'm interested in how the account creation process works. I have very little interest in writing and even less in finding references etc (I've done enough of that in high school and college) however, I do like to help the project out and try my best to do so. I bounced around a few pages and I'm still confused on how someone finds others that needs accounts created and how they then go about doing so properly. Is there some page geared towards newbies that I'm missing? Kap 7 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)