Talk:Evghenia Guțul

Neutrality

The sentence "Her statements about the infringement of Gagauz rights are narratives promoted by the Kremlin" is referenced with an article of an Ukrainian website. So it is clear, that this is Ukrainian propaganda that violates the WikiPedia-standards of neutrality. It may be a subject of critiques, if Putin is exploiting the tension between pro EU national government and pro russian Gagauz government, but that doesn't necessarily mean, that there are no infringments of Gagauz rights! Martin Mair (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Btw: The American Institute of Study of War is not a neutral source, its a lobby-group of the US military industriy! Martin Mair (talk) 21:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

I suspect the article, which had/has several prose issues and had some wrong cited dates and names of institutions, also presents some original research and synthesis. For example, at the Protests section there is a paragraph dedicated to Turkish media's reaction to Guțul's arrest. However, there is no analysis at the cited sources, it's only their opinion and reporting, which was interpreted personally by whoever added this paragraph to the article. We require a reliable secondary source and not a Wikipedia editor doing the analysis. Super Ψ Dro 11:36, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]