Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Siamese crocodile has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Siamese crocodile was changed by Pescavelho (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958112 on 2016-07-04T12:16:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 12:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My citations were taken directly from the Wiktionary page about the etymology of "Éire", they're not "original research" by any stretch of the imagination. Pescavelho (talk) 12:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary is an open Wiki and as a result is not a reliable source. Canterbury Tail talk 13:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not using Wiktionary itself as a source, I'm citing the sources cited in that Wiktionary page, which are from reputable dictionaries (better than the current source used in Republic of Ireland, which cites a tourism website). I don't get what the issue is (actually I do, you saw that I made a sizeable edit and reflexively reverted it, under the admittedly noble intention of wanting to stop potential vandalism) but if you need more sources I can provide more sources, or better yet, taking it to the Talk page of the respective articles. Pescavelho (talk) 13:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoroaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magician. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pescavelho. Thank you for your work on Bkashag. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this variant spelling isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First you placed the spammed sources wrong, it's for "Assadist Syria" which isn't prominently used (also dubious sources imo). Otherwise, the Syrian regime has almost same usage as the Assad regime (see talkpage ngrams). Syrian regime was a synonymous derogatory term to the Assad regime. So reconsider your edit imo. Beshogur (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

look Beshogur (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly: the name "Assadist Syria" and the multiple sources backing it up were already in the article, I simply shuffled them to the appropriate place instead of them being all crammed at the beginning, so you're barking at the wrong tree. I don't mind "Assadist Syria" being removed from the article, if anything I support it given both a lack of usage and the fact that it seems to imply that "Assadism" is an ideology like Baathism is.

Secondly: my main objection is that the term "Syrian regime" is too vague. All it does is denote incumbency, if the new government sticks around for as long as the Assad regime did, who's to say people won't start calling it the "Syrian regime" as well? Pescavelho (talk) 01:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that user just took all sources mentioning "Assadist Syria". No single newspaper have used this since years maybe. Beshogur (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pescavelho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bunnypranav and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Yemen-Taizz, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 20 § Yemen-Taizz.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bunnypranav}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pescavelho,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Indian Pentapotamia for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Indian Pentapotamia to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pescavelho,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged East Pentapotamia for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want East Pentapotamia to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pescavelho,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pakistani Pentapotamia for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Pakistani Pentapotamia to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pescavelho,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged West Pentapotamia for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want West Pentapotamia to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pescavelho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoctorWhoFan91 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Pentapotamian, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 29 § Pentapotamian.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pescavelho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoctorWhoFan91 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Pentapotamian language, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 29 § Pentapotamian language.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pescavelho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoctorWhoFan91 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Pentapotamians, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 29 § Pentapotamians.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pescavelho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoctorWhoFan91 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Pentapotamian people, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 29 § Pentapotamian people.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Dawud Republic has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 12 § Dawud Republic until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your recent change to Judean provisional government, and while I think your changes were appropriate and your reasoning made sense, I'm interested in the discussion around whether the historiographical name or the name they used to refer to themselves should be at the top of the infobox. The article for the Byzantine Empire, for example, has "Byzantine Empire" at the top of the infobox instead of Roman Empire or Rome like they referred to themselves. You've been editing on Wikipedia for longer than me, do you happen to know if there's a manual of style(?) policy about this, or if it's an article by article decision up to the editors or something like that? Buglover100000 (talk) 19:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a hard-and-fast rule, I just personally prefer using "official" names at the top of the infobox whenever feasible. Pescavelho (talk) 19:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Word, that makes sense! Buglover100000 (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pescavelho. Thank you for your work on Khanjar Division. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: It's just another spelling of "Handschar" (which is a more German-inspired spelling). Since "Khanjar Division" didn't redirect to anywhere else, I figured a redirect there couldn't here. Pescavelho (talk) 12:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a good source that mentions this, then add this alternate spelling to the target page. Without that, it would be surprising to readers. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article /g/ sound is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//g/ sound until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Stockhausenfan (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of the Algarve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry I of Portugal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pescavelho! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Savage Islands and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Savage Islands, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Region of León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page León.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Portuguese monarchs

added a link pointing to Bragança

Terra de Miranda

added a link pointing to Leonese

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Shovelmouth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 1 § Shovelmouth until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it looks like you have completely unsourcedly added Ethiopia to the allegiances of the White Guard of finland, and saying they were involved in the Italo-Ethiopian war and were enemies with Italy. I will assume this was a silent griefing attempt as there is quite literally nothing that points to this (nor a source added) and would like you to not do that again. I've undone your changes Jesuliz (talk) 00:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jesuliz I took it from the Finnish Wiki page for the White Guard, which has a source, but it doesn't appear to be accessible anymore (even the Wayback Machine isn't helping me). It looked sketchy to me but I was trying to pack as much information as concisely as possible when I was redoing the infobox and got carried away. Admitedly, even if some White Guards fought for Ethiopia during the Italo-Ethiopian War idk if it would merit them being mentioned, so it being removed doesn't bother me. Pescavelho (talk) 13:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – sbaio 14:44, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Bogazicili (talk) 18:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you separated some content from New Coimbra Fort, and made it into a new article. Ordinarily that'd be fine, but the article is undergoing good article review right now, and it should not be subject to significant changes. I ask you to please self-rv; additionally, you have to give attribution to the original article on the new one (on the edit summary, say something on the lines of content taken from article x, edit id y, see its history for attribution). Cheers, Coeusin (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with my edits being reverted, but I have to ask: Besides moving the infobox to the new page, leaving a link to said new page on the article, and fixing some capitalization issues, I left most of the page intact. Do those count as significant changes that could jeopardize the good article review?

As for notifying that I've lifted content from an old page to a newly created page, I'll be sure to do that going forward, thanks for the heads up. Pescavelho (talk) 10:48, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article African language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Peter II of Kongo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 5 § Peter II of Kongo until a consensus is reached. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:03, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Third Republic of Estonia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 6 § Third Republic of Estonia until a consensus is reached. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 17:57, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Fourth Republic of Estonia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 6 § Fourth Republic of Estonia until a consensus is reached. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 17:57, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]