User talk:185.130.158.100

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superlog HDL has been accepted

Superlog HDL, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HILO HDL (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:
1) Can you fix the bold formatting (three punctuation marks for bold text)? 2) Please remove sentence fragments in "History", end all sentences with a period (Before references), include a space after references, etc. 3) Please add citations to all individual sentences which are currently missing citations, such as those under Adoption and Usage and many under Features. 4) Please fix the capitalization of section titles to use title case. 5) Please add a citation for "often referred to simply as "HILO"".
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 185.130.158.100! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:HILO HDL has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:HILO HDL. Thanks! Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HILO HDL (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Possibly written with the help of LLM output; please address the fixes throughout the article and resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Caleb Stanford (talk) 04:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HILO HDL (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:
can you address the maintenance banners? Thanks!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chronologic Simulation (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:
This looks nearly there. Thank you for the article.

- Can you add a citation to all individual sentences missing citations? It is ideal to have citations at the sentence level.

- "Founding and early Management team" should not have citations (at the subsection level). Include citations on individual items or at the end of the list.

- Please address the red text. There is a missing link in the article and a citation error in the references.

Please address the above and then resubmit. Thanks!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Caleb Stanford (talk) 02:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chronologic Simulation has been accepted

Chronologic Simulation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Co-Design Automation (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 13:25, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]