This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). Television: Nickelodeon Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Top-importance). United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Hi, per the result of an AfD in 2013 consensus was for this article to be converted to a redirect to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. That isn't to say that consensus cannot be changed, but we should probably discuss this. Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicktoons for background. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As people have pointed out before me, the show "Ollie's Pack" doesn't belong here because Viacom isn't in the copyright line. It keeps being added a few times without any reasoning, so please do not keep doing this. TheFallenPower (talk) 20:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone reverted my edit to include Duckula as a precursor to Nicktoons, citing Nickelodeon's "criteria". I highly doubt Nick has a criteria of what regards a precursor. Plus given Nick's heavy involvement in its production with the express goal of it airing on Nickelodeon, it's exclusion as a frankly bizarre. Nick doesn't consider it a Nicktoon, but neither does it consider the other precursors and Nicktoons. It belongs.

James (talk) 03:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A template of their creators must return and was ruined all the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.141.204.89 (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount no longer owns Rainbow SPA, it has been spun off last year. I want a new image of the Nickelodeon Animation Studio logo, because Winx Club is a licensed Nicktoon, just like three DreamWorks shows, Tak, Monster High, and Transformers. 2601:195:C081:250:DDAB:89D:63AA:F70D (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was produced by Nick Animation Studio at that time, since that picture is from 2013. And Nick still owns the copyright to the Winx Club seasons they produced. The image is still a good image to illustrate the varied newer shows they've made under the Nicktoons banner. 71.184.192.66 (talk) 22:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait actually? How do you know 2600:1700:5440:F3A0:6826:52AD:F2DC:914F (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do the DreamWorks shows actually count as Nicktoons? Nickelodeon excluded the DreamWorks shows from their timeline picture (https://x.com/NickAnimation/status/1585964854946529281). 2600:4040:5565:B900:D4B3:2B1A:BBCF:47E (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

there are no sources in the introduction. Needs them. Bad. Seandrabik (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There should be no sources on any "intros". These are Wikipedia's leads, which are supposed to summarize the rest of the article in two or three paragraphs at most. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section: "Because the lead usually repeats information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none." Dimadick (talk) 05:32, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]