Talk:My Lai massacre

Former featured article candidateMy Lai massacre is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 31, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 16, 2004, November 20, 2004, March 16, 2005, March 16, 2006, March 16, 2007, March 16, 2008, March 16, 2009, March 16, 2012, and March 16, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Victims at My Lai

The little kid with the stripes pajamas and the person lying with long black trousers on this picture: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Dead_woman_child-My_Lai.jpg are clearly the same as on this picture, still alive: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/My_Lai_massacre_woman_and_children.jpg 2A0C:5A84:9508:1500:4093:E83D:38C6:829E (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DMY dates?

Why the use of dmy dates in this article, and the note to do so specifically? Its topic is overwhelmingly about the U.S., for which I thought Wikipedia always recommended mdy format. PacificBoy (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:My Lai_massacre.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 16, 2028. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2028-03-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Lai massacre

The My Lai massacre was a United States war crime committed on 16 March 1968...

Photograph credit: Ronald L. Haeberle

Recently featured:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citation 105 does not contain what the article text says it does

I have never edited Wikipedia, so I will leave this to people with knowledge of how this works.

The article states: "Howard Callaway, Secretary of the Army, was quoted in The New York Times in 1976 as stating that Calley's sentence was reduced because Calley honestly believed that what he did was a part of his orders—a rationale that contradicts the standards set at Nuremberg and Tokyo, where following orders was not a defense for committing war crimes."

Citation 105 is also attached to the quote: "Some have argued that the outcome of the Mỹ Lai courts-martial failed to uphold the laws of war established in the Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes Tribunals." a few paragraphs prior.

Citation 105 leads to this New York Times article from 1976, entitled "Learning From My Lai: A Proposal on War Crimes": https://www.nytimes.com/1976/04/02/archives/learning-from-my-lai-a-proposal-on-war-crimes.html

This article makes no reference to the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, only alluding to Nuremberg. It does not quote anyone named Howard Callaway, and does not reference Calley's reduction in sentence. Also, saying the article "argues that the court martial fails to uphold standards set at Nuremberg" is a bit of stretch, you can definitely infer this position from the article, but the article seems to be arguing for institutional changes. ~2026-14721-7 (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]