This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

History Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Archives

Archive 1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2018 and 4 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Astrorocket2108.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a draft for an outline to the Art history subject found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of art history. Please feel free to review and revise it. In particular, the list of scholars probably needs more eyes. There's also a RM proposal to move that to draftspace if people care. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TravisNygard (talk • contribs) [reply]

Why was the last discussion page archived?Dea Su (talk) 23:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 12 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kulveerkaur001 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sneha. .0529 (talk) 21:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The term "attribution" does not appear in the lemma, although it is vital for many others on art, especially earlier works. The delicate term has to be adressed here, since for over a hundred years it determined the art of early art historians, the aquired Kennerschaft. Like so often the problem is the search, I get Attribution (copyright), certainly not exactly, what it is abou; then maybe Acknowledgment (creative arts and sciences)? No. As (part of) a special tool set it has to be mentioned here, and maybe also linked. MenkinAlRire 20:34, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple issues within this page and it needs quite a bit of work. As a student of Art History and with enough research, I feel as though I am able to at least help edit or change some sections of this page as quite a few of it feel like a personal essay. I have already patched up the introduction to the best of my ability. 32ozredbull (talk) 18:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up making some pretty major changes to this page, there was a lot of unwarranted personal bias and essay like structure that was probably collected over the years, looks like its been an issue since at least 2021. My work on this page is probably not done here as I think I need to continue to add more to the overall timeline of the methodologies to keep it concise and important. An encyclopedia page on Art History should point out the essential historical trends. Some topics I removed should've been entire other pages. 32ozredbull (talk) 02:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More and more changes have been made. Yet I am still kinda stuck on weather or not the timeline of methodologies section is an important enough topic to warrant a very long section with multiple topics. Perhaps a brief introduction into the history of "art history" and then another section about the practices of modern day art historians? Not sure. I'll come back to this issue. 32ozredbull (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure if the sections on Carl Jung and Feminism need to exist within the timeline section. Perhaps a condensing of all of these sections to match a true "history of art history" section would be the ideal here. 32ozredbull (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]