Archives

/GA

Hello, Z423x5c6, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rey Enigma, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 08:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rey Enigma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 08:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, please take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Urysohn_space_vs._Urysohn_universal_space. PatrickR2 (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PatrickR2:I see. I agree with you. If you do not have the user right to change the redirect, just reach a sysop and they will help you. Z423x5c6 (talk) 04:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted Urysohn space to the previous redirect. But I am confused. Did you just create a new page Urysohn space (disambiguation)? If that's the case, that does not seem a good idea. Disambiguation pages are not meant to redirect to a single topic.  ??? PatrickR2 (talk) 06:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since Urysohn space was a disam page and I was using DisamAssist to resolve the links to Disam's, the page is auto created by the tool. If it is inappropriate, request a deletion. Z423x5c6 (talk) 06:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you created it, can you request deletion yourself? PatrickR2 (talk) 06:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Z423x5c6 (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome as a new contributor to Wikipedia, but that comes with some responsibilities. It's not just a matter of throwing things around and hope for the best. First we should be careful before making any changes. And when we do, we are assuming the responsibility to do it correctly and fix any problems that come with it. See in particular WP:D2D. PatrickR2 (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me repeat. At the moment that I created the new page Urysohn space (disambiguation) (through auto-creation by the tool), the page Urysohn space was a disam page. You reverted it to become a single topic page. You should be careful of any consequences of such changes. Z423x5c6 (talk) 07:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when using tools that make changes semi-automatically. One change to New York (disambiguation) made it redirect to itself ([1]) Vpab15 (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Urysohn space (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Audrey King. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least one reliable independent source with significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources, to meet WP:SPORTCRIT. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 06:52, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Adrian Yung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least one reliable independent source with significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources, to meet WP:SPORTCRIT. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 06:53, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Hi! Thank you for your review. I have added some sources to the above 2 articles. Would you like to take a look and move the page back if they satisfy the requirements? Z423x5c6 (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Yung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 22:05, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RangersRus:Hi. Thank you very much for reviewing my article for creation. As I am not completely familiar with the procedure of AFC, may I know if there is any reason that there is a main space article Adrian Yung when there is a draft Draft:Adrian Yung, when they have about the same amount of content? Is there any reason that version is accepted while my version is not accepted? Many thanks. Z423x5c6 (talk) 14:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

main space article is actually poor and has been tagged as such for missing significant coverage. Yours is however slightly better but needs significant coverage with secondary independent reliable sources, focusing more on the subject's international and national career, achievements and awards. RangersRus (talk) 14:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@RangersRus:That makes sense. Thank you very much for the explanation and suggestion. Z423x5c6 (talk) 13:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Prince of Erebor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NATHLETE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Audrey King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 03:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Z423x5c6! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 03:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Algeria at the 1964 Summer Olympics is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, while I appreciate you having re nominated this topic it should have been raised under archive2 for the second nomination of GT rather than addition2, as addition implies the topic was already a GT which it was not due to previous demotion. K. Peake 18:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Would you like to add this to WP:FTC/NP? Sorry I didn't find it obvious that whether I should use archiveX or additionX on that instruction page, and unfortunately I have made the wrong random choice. Z423x5c6 (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sorry for the late reply been away, yes I've posted this on their talk page. --K. Peake 14:57, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Thank you very much! Z423x5c6 (talk) 16:12, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, feel free to chip in there if you want to share any thoughts! --K. Peake 17:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Audrey King, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 18:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Z423x5c6! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Algeria at the 1964 Summer Olympics is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Canary757 -- Canary757 (talk) 12:06, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Z423x5c6 for collecting more than 59 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 6,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:28, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Algeria at the 1964 Summer Olympics has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Canary757 -- Canary757 (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Malta at the 1948 Summer Olympics has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 15:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]