Hi Throowa! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Latvian War of Independence that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Cat12zu3 (talk) 05:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Sea breeze, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 14:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC) I added this notice due to your change from "Utilisation" to "Utilization". Graham87 (talk) 14:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I accidentally deleted that word so I re-typed it and got it wrong. Also, I am the user that made that subheading originally, so I guess I am entitled to change it? Thanks for the notice anyway. Throowa (talk) 14:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ballistic missile, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Additionally, your edits introduced substantive errors into the article. Please make sure that all of your edits are cited to reliable sources in the future. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 04:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Flow arrangement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One source, little content, empty sections. Maybe move to draftspace

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 10:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article was instead moved to Draft:Flow arrangement. Please work to improve it there — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 19:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Throowa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flow arrangement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Throowa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Flow arrangement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Hi, I noticed that wikilinked "transfer of energy" to Coupling instead of coupling (electronics). The former is about mechanical couplers. If you use the preview button, you can see where your wiki-links are pointed by hovering the cursor over the link.

Please continue to make improvements in Wikipedia.

You can always contact me if you have questions. You can post here and use use the template {{ping|Constant314}} to ping me, or you can post on my talk page which will automatically ping me. Constant314 (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]