User talk:LikiOFF

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
Prose needs work, by somebody who knows the intended meaning. Here's a humdrum example: At the end of the XIX century, in Kuznetsk was arrived from Zlatoust younger plumber D.T. Yaroslavtsev. His hobby in a new city became a local history. Perhaps this means At the end of the 19th century, the young plumber D.T. Yaroslavtsev arrived in Kuznetsk from Zlatoust. In Kuznetsk, local history became his hobby. But I'm having to do a lot of guesswork here, and the guesses may well be wrong. An encyclopedia mustn't be based on the guesswork of its contributors.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LikiOFF! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CF-501 Falcon were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Some of the paragraphs are completely unsourced. To be fair it isn't promotional - Just needs some work in the tone.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 14:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:57, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LikiOFF. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Novokuznetsk Museum of Local Lore".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]