Herero and Nama War
Part of the Scramble for Africa
German troops in combat with the Herero in a painting by Richard Knötel.
Date 1904–1908 Location German South West Africa Result German victory, systematic extermination of native peoples
Belligerents
German Empire German South West Africa	Herero, Nama, and other Namibians
Commanders and leaders
Theodor Leutwein Lothar von Trotha	Samuel Maharero Hendrik Witbooi †
Strength
Initial strength: ~2,000[1]	Herero: 10,000[2]
Casualties and losses
KIA: 676 MIA: 76 WIA: 907 Died from disease: 689 Civilians: 100[3]	65,000–70,000 including civilians[3]

The Herero and Nama War^[4] is the collective term for a series of interlinked, anti-colonial armed struggles by native peoples in German South West Africa (present-day Namibia), mainly the Herero and Nama people, against the German Empire. The overall conflict took place between 1904 and 1908,^[5] and included the Herero uprising and the Second Nama Rebellion.

The 1904–1908 conflict has received numerous different names, with Herero and Nama War being a popular choice,^[4] including the variant war against the Ovaherero and Nama.^[6] The alternatives Namibian-German War or Namibian War had gaind popularity by the 2020s, emphasizing the anti-colonial and inter-ethnic character of the conflict.^[5] As part of the debate on Namibian genocide reparations, the Scientific Services of the German Bundestag [de] released a 2016 paper where the overall conflict was dubbed Rebellion by the Ethnic Groups of the Herero and Nama in German Southwest Africa; this naming was strongly criticized by historian Harald Kleinschmidt who regarded it as "discriminatory" and based on German colonial literature.^[7][a]

Instead of giving the entire war one name, however, researchers have often focused on individual sections or phases of the fighting and given those individual names. As such, the 1904–1908 conflict has been subdivided into the Herero uprising (1904–1907),^[10] alternatively known as Herero Revolt,^[11] Revolt of the Hereros,^[12] Herero War,^[11] or the Ovaherero-German War;^[13] and the Second Nama Rebellion (1904–1908)^[10] or Nama-German War.^[5]

Before colonization, the most populous groups in Namibia were the Herero in the central and southern regions, the Nama in the south, and the Ovambo in the north.^[10] The Ovambo were agriculturists as their lands had access to the waterways of the Etosha Pan,^[14] whereas the other native peoples were mainly semi-nomadic cattle-raisers.^[10] By the 19th century, the Herero were transitioning into a form of "nomadic feudalism", with a greater division of wealth and a political-religious elite which included the chiefs of the around 20 oruzo (paternal derivation groups).^[15] The Namibian Nama were traditionally split eight clans since the 18th century, namely the Red Nation, Fransman Nama, Swartbooi Nama, Groot Doden, Veldschoendragers, Keetmanshoop Nama, Bondelswarts, and Topnaars.^[16] In the early 19th century, the Oorlam Nama also migrated into Namibia, adding five more clans, namely the Witboois, Amraal, Bereseba, Bethanie, and the Afrikaners. The Oorlam clans were partially descended from European settlers in South Africa.^[17] Both the Herero and Nama adapted some aspects of warfare from the South African Boers, including horse-mounted guerrilla warfare.^[10] The Oorlam Nama were particularly acquainted with European ways due to having lived around Boer settlements before their migration to Namibia.^[17] In contrast, the Ovambo discouraged most contacts with European explorers and traders due to their strong focus on their inherited warrior traditions.^[14]

Smaller ethnic groups included the San, Damara, and Basters.^[18] The San were largely hunters and gatherers and weaker than the other native peoples.^[19] The Damaras were largely "serfs" or slaves of Herero and Nama, while the free Damaras existed as hunters and gatherers in the local mountains. The Basters were descended from "legally recognized and religiously consecrated unions" of Dutch men and Nama women; they were proud of their European heritage and spoke Dutch.^[20]

From 1830, the later Namibia became engulfed in warfare between the different ethnic groups and clans due to influx of migrants from other regions, the spread of European firearms by trade, and scarcity of resources due to droughts.^[21] A major conflict erupted when Herero intruded into traditional Nama lands on the search for new pastures in 1830, whereupon the Nama rallied under the leadership of Jonker Afrikaner to push them back. The resulting fighting intermittently lasted until 1858, with Jonker Afrikaner temporarily dominating much of Namibia,^[22] while the Herero suffered such heavy losses that European Christian missionaries prematurely claimed that the "Herero race has so far as we know ceased to exist".^[23] Under the pressure of Christian missionaries and many Nama –who had grown wary of his power– Jonker Afrikaner was forced into signing the peace treaty of Hoachanas in 1858. As part of this treaty, the Herero acknowledged the Nama as overlords.^[24]

After Jonker Afrikaner died in 1861, his Nama coalition fell apart. As Swedish trader Charles Andersson had also sold large numbers of guns to the Herero, the latter exploited the Nama's weakness by launching a new conflict which became known as the "Herero War of Freedom". At the time, local white residents began petitioning both the Cape Colony and North German Confederation to intervene to bring the Nama-Herero conflicts to an end, but these requests were ignored. Regardless, historian Jon Bridgman argued that these petitions set "a dangerous precedent" for things to come. The war ultimately concluded with the treaty of Okahandja in 1870, with the Herero regaining their independence.^[25]

From 1870, Herero chief Samuel Maharero became the predominant figure in Namibia, being called upon to mediate in disputes by Herero, Nama, and Europeans alike. However, Maharero regarded his position as tenuous and continued to view the Nama as potential enemies; he thus requested the Cape Colony to send a commissioner to secure the peace and, by extension, his own position. As a result of Maharero's closeness to commissioner William Coates Palgrave, the Nama were ultimately unwilling to submit to the Palgrave Commission.^[26] The peace process collapsed in 1880, when a new war broke out over a border incident and Palgrave withdrew from the region. The renewed conflict was economically ruinous to local European traders.^[27]

In the early 1880s, the German statesman Otto von Bismarck, reversing his previous rejection of colonial acquisitions, decided on a policy of imperial expansion. In 1882 Bismarck gave permission to Adolf Lüderitz to obtain lands which Germany would bring within its "protection", under the conditions that a port was established within the territories taken and that there was "clear title" to the land. Lüderitz bought the title to Angra Pequena (later renamed Lüderitz Bay) from Joseph Fredericks, a chief of the Oorlam people, in exchange for 200 rifles, 2,500 German marks, and some lead toy soldiers, and established a port there. Clarification of Germany's title among the European powers took some time, as the British demurred in response to a German request to clarify the boundaries of their title, however in April 1884 Bismarck instructed the German consul in declare "Lüderitzland" (as Lüderitz's holding in South-West Africa had become known) as under the "protection" of the German Reich. Lüderitz steadily spread Germany's influence throughout the South-West African territory until by 1885 only one tribe within it – the Witboois – had not concluded some kind of arrangement with Germany.^[28]

The continued resistance of the Witboois, led by Hendrik Witbooi, culminated in an armed conflict in 1893, as the Germans opted to violently force them into submission. This campaign, also known as the "First Nama Rebellion", demonstrated the Nama's effective use of guerrilla warfare and dragged on until 1904. It was concluded when the new German governor, Theodor Leutwein, managed to corner the Witboois in the Naukluft Mountains where they agreed to surrender. The German-Witbooi treaty allowed the Witbooi Nama to remain under arms as German allies and auxiliaries.^[29] Over the next years, Leutwein launched disarmament and punitive operations to subjugate native groups, including the Mbandjeru and Khaua Nama, the Zwartboois, the Grootfontein "mixed-bloods", and some Nama Afrikaners.^[30]

Whilst Rhenish missionaries, traders, and other Europeans had been present in the territory since the 1830s, it was only with the advent of Germany's claim to South-West Africa that German settlement of the territory began in earnest. By 1903 there were roughly 4,682 European settlers in the protectorate of whom nearly 3,000 were Germans, most of them in the towns of Lüderitz, Swakopmund, and Windhoek. The advent of large-scale German settlement also brought about changes in the treatment of the native Herero and Nama peoples by Europeans, with native people facing increased legal discrimination and expropriation of land for the use of European settlers.^[31] The impact of the German colonization was uneven, with the Herero territories being heavily affected,^[32] whereas the Ovambo "remained essentially unconquered".^[10] The fort Namutoni effectively marked the northern border of German control, beyond which the Ovambo remained largely self-governing.^[33]

Traditional Herero society and political-religious systems disintegrated during the German rule. The new commercial pressures encouraged many Herero to sell their cattle, forcing large numbers to become cattle ranchers who worked for Germans or richer Herero.^[34] Samuel Maharero was officially appointed Herero paramount chief by the Germans, though this position had not existed before colonization and Maharero could not fulfill the religious duties of the chiefdom due to being Christian.^[34] There existed no measures for Maharero, let alone other chiefs, to enforce their decision across the entire Herero people; at best, chiefs like Maharero acted as primus inter pares. Regardless of any formal appointments, the power of all Herero chiefs largely depended on their wealth and had to be shared with all other cattle owners. Furthermore, the Herero were subdivided into nine large tribes by 1903. The Okahandja Herero under Maharero's personal leadership were the largest tribe, bordered to the west by the Omaruru Herero of Chief Manasse and the Otijimbingwe Herero under Chief Zacharias. Around Mount Waterberg lived Chief Kambazeni's tribe, while the east was split into smaller tribes under Chiefs Nikodemus, Tjetjo, Mambo, Ombondju, and Kakimena.^[35]

The Herero's key grievance and the structural condition which led to the outbreak of the war was the existence of an unfair judicial system. If a white person was killed, multiple Africans would be executed as punishment. In contrast, settlers could kill natives with effective impunity because African lives were deemed worthless, so the judicial system would find a way to exonerate or issue a minimal punishment.^[36] The result was widespread murder and rape against Africans by settlers, which weakened the colonial administration's monopoly on violence and overall authority. The victims were powerless to get redress for these crimes because police and soldiers were among the perpetrators.^[37] African witnesses were generally deemed to be unreliable by German courts,^[32] often contributing to the courts exonerating settlers accused of wrongdoings.^[32] Several settlers abused the lopsided judicial system, becoming serial violators. On the other side, Germans who opposed the abuses were ostracized by settlers and even sanctioned by the courts as well as colonial authorities.^[32] German employers were legally allowed to beat, whip, and flog indigenous employees.^[38][32] Even chiefs were subject to corporal punishments. According to historian Horst Drechsler, most "Germans described the Africans as baboons and treated them accordingly".^[32]

The influence of the struggle over land in regards to the Herero uprising remains disputed among researchers. Some studies have emphasized struggle over land as the central cause of the uprising, but the colonist population was not quickly increasing in 1903 and other research has shown that the land question was not urgent.^[39][b] In the period before the rebellion, Leutwein had begun to implement a strategy to concentrate indigenous people on reserves.^[40] The creation of the reserves, alongside a statute limiting contracts in July 1903, were supposed to at least partially remedy abuses against the Herero. Instead, the reserves openly showcased how little land the Herero still held, while the statute led traders to further pressure natives to repay debts. These measures thus led to even greater grievances among the Herero.^[41] The building of the Otavi railway resulted in further seizure of land in the southern territories of the Herero, and the railway's financier –the Otavigesellschaft– openly demanded that the Herero cede not just land for a further expansion of the line itself but also all water rights and a 20 kilometres (12 mi) stretch along the tracks. Leutwein negotiated with Samuel Maharero over these demands until the chief partially yielded. Maharero agreed to relinquish land for the railway's tracks free of charge, but no additional territory.^[42] The Herero were aware that the expansion of the railway might lead to an influx of more settlers into their areas.^[32]

In general, the settler population as well as German authorities ignored the provisions of the protection treaty with the Herero, with Leutwein noting that the majority of the local whites were even ignorant of the treaty's existence. The Herero complained that the Germans were violating their customs and breaking the treaty; realizing that the old promises were ignored, many Herero also no longer felt bound by the agreement by 1904.^[32]

In 1903, a rebellion by the Bondelswarts, a Nama clan, erupted in the southeastern Namibia. Lieutenant Walter Jobst, Warmbad district chief, had violently intervened in a dispute over a supposedly stolen goat, shooting Bondelswarts Kaptein (chief) Jan Abram Christiaan. The chief's followers responded by killing Jobst. Governor Leutwein responded by leading the majority of the colony's Schutztruppe garrison to punish the Bondelswarts.^[43] On 25 December 1903, a company of Schutztruppe was diverted to the far south of the colony to quell the Bondelswarts' rebellion, leaving the north stripped of troops^[44]—there were only 770 German soldiers in the entire colony.^[45] A short and fierce war erupted.^[46] At this point, several local clans still offered support to the Germans; for instance, Hendrik Witbooi's clan fought alongside the Schutztruppe against the Bondelswarts.^[47]

The Bondelswarts were still fighting by early 1904, ensuring that most of the German colonial troops were not present in central Namibia when the Herero uprising broke out.^[46]

In response to their grievances, several Herero leaders including Samuel Maharero began to plan an anti-German uprising.^[13] The Herero uprising was an act of desperation to retake their land, cattle, and political independence; as well as exact revenge.^[38] Matthias Häussler writes that the war was limited in means but not ends; the Herero wanted the permanent end of German colonization.^[48] Maharero attempted to forge a wider coalition within Namibia. He secretly contacted the Ovambo in the north, encouraging them to ally with the Herero.^[47] Despite this, the Ovambo largely did not involve themselves in the developing conflict.^[49]

The removal of most German troops from their lands due to the Bondelswarts rebellion provided the Herero with a favorable strategic situation, contributing to the rebel leaders triggering their rising in January 1904.^[46]

The Herero clans seized the opportunity to rebel on 12 January 1904.^[38] The uprising caught the colonists by surprise^[50] and saw a stunning success at first: farms and businesses were plundered, and 123^[38] or as many as 160 Germans were killed.^[45] Most of those killed were farmers and traders; German soldiers were only one-tenth of the dead. The rebels generally spared women, children, missionaries, and white people who were not German.^[50][45] Individual attacks were planned to take advantage of deception and surprise, and the Herero seized weapons and supplies.^[50] The Herero killed men, took anything useful, razed buildings, and attempted to destroy everything else, in an attempt to destroy colonists' economic existence and force them to depart Namibia forever.^[48] The occurrence of mutilation, particularly castration, was in revenge for the sexual violence that had previously been visited on Herero women.^[51]

After the uprising's start, Samuel Maharero sent letters to Kaptein Hermanus van Wyk of the Rehoboth Basters as well as Hendrik Witbooi, requesting their support.^[47] In his letter to Witbooi, Maharero expressed his desire for an inter-ethnic alliance, famously exclaiming Let us die fighting!^[52] Yet van Wyk and Witbooi initially refused to join any rebellion, and van Wyk turned the letters over to the Germans. Maharero may had hoped that the Nama and Basters could tie down the Germans in the south, but this came not to pass.^[47] Upon learning of the Herero's actions, Leutwein hastily initiated negotiations with the Bondelswarts and concluded a peace which provided for the clan's disarmament but was otherwise not favourable to the Germans; this allowed him to move his troops back north.^[13] When the colonial authorities called upon the Nama clans to provide auxiliaries in accordance with the old treaties, they obliged; about 100 Nama joined the anti-Herero operations, including several Witboois.^[47] The Basters also sided with the Germans, but remained loyal to the colonial authorities throughout the entire conflict.^[20]

Troops were also sent from Germany to re-establish order but only dispersed the rebels, led by Chief Maharero. The Herero led a guerrilla campaign, conducting fast hit-and-run operations then melting back into the terrain they knew well, preventing the Germans from gaining an advantage with their modern artillery and machineguns. The German governor Theodor Leutwein sent desperate messages to Maharero in hopes of negotiating an end to the war. The Hereros, however, were emboldened by their success and had come to believe that, "the Germans were too cowardly to fight in the open," and rejected Leutwein's offers of peace. One missionary wrote, "One hears nothing but (Herero) talk of 'cleaning up,' 'executing,' 'shooting down to the last man,' 'no pardon,' etc."^[53]

The Germans were largely surprised by the uprising.^[54] Soon after the rebellion began, German Emperor Wilhelm II replaced Leutwein with the notorious General Lothar von Trotha.^[55]

Some German authorities quickly began to investigate the rebellion's causes. The Reichstag demanded an official inquiry in March 1904, and this demand was reluctantly backed by Oskar Stuebel, director of the Colonial Department. Chancellor Bernhard von Bülow forwarded the demand to Wilhelm II who promptly postponed any investigation indefinitely.^[56] In general, German imperialists showcased little genuine interest in the circumstances of the rebellion, instead viewing it as a good pretext to seize more control as well as territory in South West Africa.^[54] The uprising was broadly blamed on Herero "blood-thirstiness", "racial strife", the traders' practices,^[56] and Leutwein's allegedly too-lenient governing style.^[57] British influence was also used as a scapegoat,^[58] with Leutwein quickly joining those who claimed that British individuals had incited the Herero to rebel, seeking to deflect blame from himself.^[57] The ensuing anti-British campaign—including the arrest of British citizens in South West Africa—petered out once no evidence could be found.^[58] German missionaries were also blamed by officials and the pro-colonial press, alleging that the missionaries were somehow abetting the insurgents. Missionaries responded with an anonymous letter in the newspaper Der Reichsbote, clarifying that the rebellion was rooted in the mistreatment of Herero by settlers and officials. This further incited imperialists and colonial officials; the "shadow-boxing" between the missionaries and their critics in the press ultimately availed to little.^[59]

A conclusive battle was fought on 11 August 1904, at the Battle of Waterberg in the Waterberg Mountains. Chief Maharero believed his six to one advantage over the Germans would allow him to win in a final showdown. The Germans had time to bring forward their artillery and heavy weapons. Both sides took heavy losses, but the Herero were scattered and defeated.^[60]

Trotha's troops defeated 3,000–5,000 Herero combatants at the Battle of Waterberg but were unable to encircle and annihilate the retreating survivors.^[61]: 605 The pursuing German forces prevented groups of Herero from breaking from the main body of the fleeing force and pushed them further into the desert. As exhausted Herero fell to the ground, unable to go on, German soldiers killed men, women, and children.^[62]: 22

It took the Germans until 1908 to re-establish authority over the territory. By that time tens of thousands of Africans (estimates range from 34,000 to 110,000) had been either killed^{[63][64][65][66][67][68]} or died of thirst while fleeing. 65,000 of 80,000 Hereros and at least 10,000 of 20,000 Nama died as a result of the conflict.^[69]

As a result of their loyalty during the conflict, the Basters were rewarded by the German government by being permitted to retain their lands and way of life until World War I.^[20]

In 1915, during World War I, South African forces occupied it in the so-called South West Africa Campaign, and SW Africa officially became a mandate of South Africa in 1920.^[70]

On 16 August 2004, 100 years after the war, the German government officially apologised for the atrocities.^[71] "We Germans accept our historic and moral responsibility and the guilt incurred by Germans at that time," said Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, Germany's development aid minister. In addition, she admitted that the massacres were equivalent to genocide.^[72]

Not until 2015 did the German government admit that the massacres were equivalent to genocide and again apologised in 2016.^{[contradictory]} The Herero are suing the German government in a class action lawsuit.^[73] In 2021, Germany announced that they would repay Namibia €1.1 billion.^[74]

Some notable fighters in Herero Wars are revered as the national heroes of Namibia.^[75]

The Herero Wars and the massacres are both depicted in a chapter of the 1963 novel V. by Thomas Pynchon. The tragic story of the Herero and Nama Genocide also appears in Pynchon's 1973 novel Gravity's Rainbow.

The heavy toll of the Herero and Nama genocide on individual lives and the fabric of Herero culture is seen in the 2013 historical novel Mama Namibia by Mari Serebrov.^[76]

The war and the massacres are both significantly featured in The Glamour of Prospecting,^[77] a contemporary account by Frederick Cornell of his attempts to prospect for diamonds in the region. In the book, he describes his first-hand accounts of witnessing the concentration camp on Shark Island amongst other aspects of the conflict.

• Herero and Nama genocide
• National heroes of Namibia

• Adhikari, Mohamed (2022). Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples. Hackett Publishing. ISBN 978-1-64792-055-5.
• Alnæs, Kirsten (1989). "Living with the past: The Songs of the Herero in Botswana". Africa: Journal of the International African Institute. 59 (3). Cambridge University Press: 267–299. doi:10.2307/1160229. JSTOR 1160229. S2CID 143939978.
• Bridgman, Jon (1981). The Revolt of the Hereros. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-04113-4.
• de Quesada, Alejandro (2013). Imperial German Colonial and Overseas Troops 1885–1918. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1780961644.
• Dedering, Tilman (2024). "The Herero and Nama War in German South-West Africa (1904-1907) in newspaper reports". In Andreas Eckl; Matthias Häussler; Martha Akawa-Shikufa (eds.). An Unresolved Issue: Genocide in Colonial Namibia (PDF). Windhoek: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. pp. 121–136. ISBN 978-99945-56-38-0.
• Drechsler, Horst (1980). "Let Us Die Fighting": The Struggle of the Herero and Nama against German Imperialism (1884–1915). Zed Press. ISBN 0905762479.
• Faber-Jonker, Leonor (2023). "'Rivers of Blood and Rivers of Money': The Herero and Nama Genocides in German Southwest Africa, 1904–1908". The Cambridge World History of Genocide. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-76548-0.
• Gaudi, Robert (2017). African Kaiser: General Paul Von Lettow-Vorbeck and the Great War in Africa, 1914–1918. Caliber. ISBN 978-1-84904-867-5. Retrieved 1 June 2021 – via Google Books.
• Gann, Lewis H.; Duignan, Peter (1977). The Rulers of German Africa, 1884-1914. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0804709385.
• Häussler, Matthias (2021). The Herero Genocide: War, Emotion, and Extreme Violence in Colonial Namibia. Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-80073-024-3.
• Kleinschmidt, Harald (2024). "The Scientific Re-Presentation of Colonialist Propaganda. An analysis of the legal opinion by the Scientific Services of the Deutscher Bundestag relating to Namibian compensation claims". In Andreas Eckl; Matthias Häussler; Martha Akawa-Shikufa (eds.). An Unresolved Issue: Genocide in Colonial Namibia (PDF). Windhoek: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. pp. 301–330. ISBN 978-99945-56-38-0.
• Kössler, Reinhart (2024). "The Nama-German War – an integral part of a complex trajectory of large-scale violence". In Andreas Eckl; Matthias Häussler; Martha Akawa-Shikufa (eds.). An Unresolved Issue: Genocide in Colonial Namibia (PDF). Windhoek: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. pp. 51–68. ISBN 978-99945-56-38-0.
• Lindner, Ulrike (2011). Koloniale Begegnungen: Deutschland und Großbritannien als Imperialmächte in Afrika 1880-1914 (in German). Campus Verlag. ISBN 978-3593394855.
• Morlang, Thomas (2008). Askari und Fitafita. "Farbige" Söldner in den deutschen Kolonien (in German). Ch. Links Verlag. ISBN 978-3861534761.
• Zollmann, Jakob (2010). Koloniale Herrschaft und ihre Grenzen: Die Kolonialpolizei in Deutsch-Südwestafrika 1894 - 1915 (in German). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN 978-3525370186.

• Bühler, Andreas H. (2003). Der Namaaufstand gegen die deutsche Kolonialherrschaft in Namibia von 1904-1913 (in German). Iko-Verlag Berlin. ISBN 978-3889396761.