The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BeIN Sports (Spain) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner talk 17:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It's a national Spanish cable channel. Can't see why this wouldn't be inherently notable per WP:BROADCAST, nor does the nominator any particularly valid deletion rationale. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep "From the 2016/2017 season, Bein Sports will broadcast La Liga and Copa del Rey". The two biggest soccer tourneys in Spain and most of the world. Yeah, this is obvious it's not a fly-by-night operation. WP:BADFAITH, as with the other BeIN noms. Nate • (chatter) 04:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have no real arguments so you start accusing me of bad faith? Poor you, poor Wikipedia. The Banner talk 09:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep for similar reasons as already mentioned (notably WP:BCAST) and that I wrote at the BeIN Sports Australia AfD by the same nominator. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: easily meets criteria listed in WP:BCAST for notability. musimax. (talk) 15:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – The one-word rationale for deletion is not convincing; no qualification is provided. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This article does seem to meet the notability criteria for WP:BROADCAST.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.