The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. and no indication further input is forthcoming. Not a keep as there was no policy based argument made for such. Star Mississippi 16:18, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

.32 Remington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for a year. -- Beland (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This was closed as WP:SOFTDELETE yesterday and then undeleted today by request of 71.246.246.28, who said "Cartridge is still in relatively common use and has many published books with at minimum dimensions and pressure specifications to maintain the article. Others can be found for the history of the cartridge and it's origin." (I assume you're fine with this being reopened, @Explicit?) SilverLocust 💬 19:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep-32 Remington article is perfectly accurate and a valid, useful summary of the cartridge’s history for collectors and enthusiasts. Let’s not set up factual articles for deletion based on political bias Mr Beland. Please, Wikipedia is an open forum providing factual reference. Period. There’s no reason to delete this article. 53gravely (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thumbs up 24.154.48.13 (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I still own one it was my father's still used to this day 24.154.48.13 (talk) 00:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SilverLocust 💬 19:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Try bidding for ammunition components for this cartridge and you will find that interest is still very high. Thousands of these rifles are cherished by those who still use them and will be for years to come. The information here helps prevent mishaps that can occur because of ignorance of vital dimensional information in the article. 66.116.4.190 (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.