Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Discussion | Alerts | Assessment | Manual of Style | Peer review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Here you can discuss with other users about general questions and issues involving the project. | Here you can be updated on important changes in the workflow status of articles tagged by this project. | Here you can check the project ratings statistics, learn how to assess articles, or request us an assessment. | Here you can follow the project guidelines to help you create, expand, and format articles. | Here you can ask the project membership to perform a review on any of its tagged articles. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
To start a new discussion section, please |
Olympedia
To let you know, Olympedia and the IOC have agreed a new contract and the website will be reactivated sometime in the next couple of weeks Topcardi (talk) 17:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- But heaven forfend that anyone should say that what is effectively a Wiki run by the IOC is not an independent, reliable source.... FOARP (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
[Another] Olympedia discussion
Link here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RFC:_Olympedia ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Template:Infobox chess biography, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khiikiat (talk) 10:41, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Discussion about WikiProject banner templates
For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:
- "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."
There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 19:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)
Good article reassessment for Kanō Jigorō
Kanō Jigorō has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Richmond Park
Richmond Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Annika Zeyen
Annika Zeyen has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
If someone has time, this article is rather an embarrassment because Samson was a prominent thoracic and cardiac surgeon with a medical society named after him. He was chief of surgery at the hospital at Samuel Merritt University and also was on the faculty at Stanford University School of Medicine. In 1946 he founded the thoracic and cardiac surgery training program at Highland Hospital. One of the problems with all of these Olympics sports stubs is that editors often don't look to see if the person was more notable in something else besides being an Olympic athlete. There's a decent obituary on him in Dr. Paul C. Samson, Oakland Tribune, February 12, 1982, page 4 viewable in newspapers.com. I suggest a re-naming of the title because he certainly was better known as a doctor than an athlete. I'm going to leave similar messages at a few other WikiProjects. Best.4meter4 (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Maxim Lapierre
Maxim Lapierre has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red year-long focus on women in sport
Throughout the whole of 2026, Women in red is focusing on women in sport. This provides opportunities for creating biographies of notable women in a wide variety of sports, not forgetting those competing in the Winter Olympics and Paralypics early in the year. If you are not already a member of Women in Red, feel free to join up under "New registrations" here.--Ipigott (talk) 10:00, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Svetlana Kuznetsova
Svetlana Kuznetsova has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Czech Republic or Czechia
If the IOC is now using "Czechia". Shouldn't we be doing so too, post-2022 Olympics articles? GoodDay (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Czech Republic men's national ice hockey team#Requested move 6 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. The outcome of the discussion may affect other names of the nations at the Olympics. FromCzech (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)