Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Case (baseball)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 22:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Jim Case (baseball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCOLLATH. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Keep as WP:NCOLLATH specifies "College [...] coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other WP:ROUTINE coverage." and coverage like this and this and this all go well beyond mere statistics and routine coverage. - Dravecky (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Dravecky. Sufficient coverage from independent sources exists. Billcasey905 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Dravecky. Meets WP:GNG and WP:NCOLLATH. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.