The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Wikimedia Foundation. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jan-Bart de Vreede (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a perfect example of navel gazing on Wikipedia. Whilst de Vreede is the chair of the board of trustees, this does not carry any inherent notability. The only two sources present in the article has one being a directory type listing at his place of work, and the other is a miniscule profile in a directory type listing on Newsweek. He just isn't notable NoNavelGaving (talk) 18:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-direct This same information is available on the Board of Trustees page. In fact, this page has been re-directed to the BoT page at least twice, which is what seems appropriate. LaMona (talk) 20:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• REDIRECT to Wikimedia Foundation, as it is done for Vrede's predecessor Kat Walsh. Can't find any in-depth coverage of Vrede in independent, reliable sources, only a few mentions in passing. So fails GNG and agree with nom. that his position carries no inherent notability. Iselilja (talk) 20:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Per above. MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 00:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per above --Belladonna2 (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect AAA3AAA (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Meta where WMF stuff belongs and delete from Wikipedia. --Matthiasb (talk) 16:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• comment Contributions of initiating user indicates that he is likely yet another User:Russavia sock. Mangoe (talk) 11:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - As has been noted in similar AfDs, a WMF chair is not an inherently notable position, so unless there is strong reliable sourcing that comes along, this person does not satisfy the project's notability criteria. Also, if hay is to be made about who the nominator may or may not be, then I'll be willing to take over the AfD as my own. Tarc (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Why would we redirect it to the WMF article, rather than to the article of the company (if it has one). It's still navel gazing to some extent. 175.106.60.100 (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - Per above. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.