The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High-impact entrepreneurship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Recreated shortly after deletion via PROD; the reason then was "An essay or reflection: WP:OR". This still seems very true. Also a WP:NEO with little evidence the term is used anywhere other than by the company Endeavor, which the article heavily features. The editor also created the (speedily deleted) article Endeavor (nonprofit) and has placed links to it all over the place - clearly WP:SPAM applies also. Ros0709 (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Article is unnecessary and should be merged into the Entrepreneurship article. – Jerry^teps 22:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an OR essay.--Boffob (talk) 04:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Struck the comment from the nomination about creating Endeavor (nonprofit) - this was in fact not created User talk:Globalendeavor but by User talk:Endeavorg at around the same time. Both users are WP:SPAs. Ros0709 (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- a well-written (if a little preachy) and cited essay- but not appropriate for Wikipedia for reasons elaborated above. I think the term does deserve mention at Entrepreneurship if it isn't already. L'Aquatique[talk] 15:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.