Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Čejka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yak~cswiki, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yak~cswiki. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jaroslav Čejka".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jaroslav Čejka, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yak~cswiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jaroslav Čejka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^unEins^uno 11:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yak-indolog, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!

Qalb alasid (talk) 23:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Classification of Arabic languages. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Antoine, describing what you did is not an attack. I would appreciate if you'd bother to explain why you just dumped a complete edit (with several corrections) instead of taking the "work" and removing the one term you found redundant. This "one-click laziness does disservice to the project, as users are unnecessarilly deprived of a correction (the point was that Old Arabic is not Classical Arabic, which misinformation was returned to the page by you) and editors deterred from investing work next time. Yak Yak-indolog (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"The person must have been drunk or drugged" and "do it yourself, when you get sober" are personal attacks. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 16:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Hubli and Halebidu, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dharwad, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add Indic script to our articles, but have continued to do so, please stop. - Arjayay (talk) 12:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Osmanabad.
It has repeatedly been explained, above, that you should not add Indic script to our articles, but have continued to do so, please stop. - Arjayay (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kochi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 22:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay

PLEASE DO BLOCK ME FROM EDITING!

You'll only do me a service

Your accusation of vandalism is, as we both know, a false accusations. Since you'd hardly try to claim you have never read the article defining of what vandalism is, it is an INTENTIONAL false accusation:

Not only have I not committed any vandalism as per the current definition, but not even any of the acts listed as sometimes incorrectly called vandalism.

On the other hand, some of your actions could arguably fall into the vandalism category "removing encyclopedic content".

The "revert" button is to be used only when EVERYTHING in previous edit is wrong or not complying with standards. If multiple changes are present in one edit where you dislike ONE item, the only proper way is to restrain yourself to removing that one item. Please, do not abuse the revert button and do not make personal attacks, such as knowingly false accusations of good faith editors offering their time and skills for free.

Anyway, I am serious, I will be thankful to you, if you block me from editing. It will save me a lot of time and energy, so I can concentrate on paid editing and resting. Yak-indolog (talk) 07:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]