We Wikipedia Editors are here in journalistic service. Like you, I have dedicated TIME to this Wikipedia Movement. And, I would appreciate that my dedicated time and journalistic works here be treated with respect and care. This is a collaborative project. We are here to WORK together, not against one another. Thank you. In good faith and service.

Hello, HumanWritesBook, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is great. thank you. HumanWritesBook (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Onorem (talk) 21:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! HumanWritesBook, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is great! Thank you @Liz HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bing Worthington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Message received and noted with gratitude. It is an honor and privilege to be here in service to contribute the rightful, detailed documentation of relevant facts for proper preservation. Sincerely, with gratitude HumanWritesBook (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HumanWritesBook. Thanks for expanding Bing Worthington. I reverted a few of your additions today. I'm happy to elaborate on the reasons for the reverts if I was unclear. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Robby.is.on thank you for the memo. Please do elaborate...HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on

• WikiProject Hip-hop articles
• Stub-Class culture articles
• WikiProject Culture articles
• Stub-Class Pop music articles
• Stub-Class film articles
• WikiProject Film articles
• Stub-Class Black Lives Matter articles
• Unknown-importance Black Lives Matter articles

Bing Worthington HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do elaborate... Sure, I will. Please tell me which of my reverts are unclear and why. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! HumanWritesBook (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your thank you but just letting you know that the newest messages on any noticeboard or talk page are placed at the bottom of the page. If you put them at the top or in the middle of the page, the editor is not likely to see them. You can see this on your own User talk page as I've placed this message at the bottom of the page. It's where editors naturally look for new messages.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HumanWritesBook. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bing Worthington, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HumanWritesBook. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bing Worthington 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Hardy (attorney), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 03:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is an honor to work with you! HumanWritesBook (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HumanWritesBook. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bing Worthington".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent additions at Get Loose Crew require quite a bit of cleanup, including random bold font and nonsense phrases such as "The group is came to rise became". I'm working on sixing these errors now.

Please take more time with your edits, and please review the Manual of Style. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Similar issues at Beat Factory, such as inappropriate bold and italic text, and the nonsense phrase "based in It was an Ivan Berry and songwriter Rupert Gayle." Because you also added sources and made some improvements, I am fixing your edits rather than reverting them, but honestly this wording is so scrambled that it's borderline vandalism. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I can absolutely see that you are acting in good faith to improve the Beat Factory article. However, your recent additions contained many errors, so I've removed it until those can be addressed. Your work has not been deleted - you can access it in the page history.

I would advise you to repost the content in your sandbox, where you can work on it until it is ready to resubmit. There were many errors such as inappropriate bold text, lack of italics on album titles, and mismatch of verb tense throughout the timeline section. There were also incomplete sentences, unexplained external links, and incorrect capital letters.

Please review the Manual of Style, as linked several times above, before contributing again. I'm happy to work with you on this - I'm very glad to see you're adding legitimate content with sources - but you really do need to clean this up significantly. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Human errors are to be corrected, in good faith HumanWritesBook (talk) 02:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natasha Doyle-Merrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Doyle-Merrick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2025

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackie Robinson Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. for bringing my attention to the hill, i did not know that. the matter has been addressed. HumanWritesBook (talk) 02:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HumanWritesBook! Your additions to Douglas Century have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa hello Diannaa . can you please help me to understand why a substantial list of cited articles -- which included Princeton University, The Globe & Mail, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Toronto Star and The Calgary Herald -- were completed deleted? I look forward to your reply. HumanWritesBook (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The citations were part of the section I had to remove because it was copied from https://www.caa.com/entertainmenttalent/books/author/douglas-century. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:29, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! @Diannaa since you deleted substantial citation-content of supporting evidential value to the page Douglas Century, may I ask that you kindly reenter those referenced notes --- all of which were carefully researched, reviewed, sourced and noted over the course of several hours; for the record, including, but not limited to -- Calgary Herald , Toronto Star, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Globe and Mail, Princeton University records. Should you want to team up to make this article a solid one for the books, I would love to work with you! Please let me know! Sincerely, HumanWritesBook (talk) 01:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the citations.

• Davis, Paul (June 18, 2018). "BOOK REVIEW: 'Hunting El Chapo' by Andrew Hogan and Douglas Century". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Nevett, Joshua (2016-01-09). "El Chapo: How Mexico's drug kingpin fell victim to his own legend". BBC News. Retrieved 2025-06-15.*Kamiya, Gary (2005-07-24). "'Under and Alone': Hairy Guys on Wheels". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2025-06-15.*Krug, Nora (2009-08-26). "New in Paperback". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Jenks, Jayson (2019-07-10). "The Fighter: From champ to war hero to full-blown junkie — and back again". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Silver, Hannah (2023-05-18). "Calgary celebrates Israel@75: A People United". Alberta Jewish News. Retrieved 2025-06-15.*Associated, Press (2021-10-19). "Ice-T remembers path not taken in memoir 'Split Decision'". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Dreisinger, Baz (2011-04-22). "Ice-T, Living Out Loud". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Cahalan, Susannah (2011-04-03). "Melting the Ice". New York Post. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• "Takedown: The Fall of the Last Mafia Empire". CSpan. November 4, 2002.
• "Douglas Century". Tablet Magazine. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Rossi, Tony (2020-08-25). "The 2020 Christopher Award Winners in Books, TV, and Film Celebrate Courage, Grace, and Mercy". Light One Candle - the blog of The Christophers. Retrieved 2025-06-16.
• Century, Douglas (1999-11-21). "The Extra 'V' in Very V.I.P." The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2025-06-15.*Century, Douglas (2014-06-20). "Russell Simmons Shooting TV Pilot, Producing Rap Opera & Spending Millions on Movies". Billboard. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Century, Douglas (2022-07-23). "Opinion: Vladimir Putin is the most brazen, powerful and wealthy mobster of all time". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
• Century, Douglas (2002-01-26). "Rhymes and reason". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-06-15.

— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is great, thank you ... intend to engage! HumanWritesBook (talk) 22:18, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Michelle Levy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sources were LA Times HumanWritesBook (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michelle Levy. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 08:54, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HumanWritesBook,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Emanuelle Gattuso for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 03:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Bash007 concerning the page Emanuelle Gattuso, considering the material content you are charging as copyright infringement is presented in BLOCK QUOTE format listed under FURTHER READING, with a direct link to the source (ALL LISTED AS IS BELOW), I move to suggest an editorial resolution (perhaps omitting the block quote?) rather than nominating the entire page for "speedy deletion"@Missvain @Dan arndt, @BusterD, @Onel5969, @PFHLai, @Ryan shell, @Schwede66 @Rhino131 @ForsythiaJo@Pi bot ~~~

@Uncle Bash007 @Fram @Asilvering please join the discussions over @Uncle Bash007's nomination for "speedy deletion" of the page Emanuelle Gattuso, citing "copyright infringement" , rather than moving to support good editorial efforts that support a resolution in the matter. For the record, said "copied content" is presented in BLOCK QUOTE format of the subject being quoted under the heading FURTHER READIN, with both a sourced citation and external link to the published content. Furthermore, deleting the page Emanuelle Gattuso would omit a notably recognized subject from WIKIPEDIA HISTORY. We are here to in journalistic service, volunterring our time and expertise, to collaborate, not waste time launching unjust "editorial wars", respectfully. Now, let's work together, not against one another, I have dedicated, like you all, my TIME to the Wikipedia Movement. I would appreciate my time and work be treated with respect and care. Thank you. If I can be of further service, please d

The "as is" Page Emanuelle Gattuso nominated by

@

Uncle Bash007

for "speedy deletion":

Emanuelle Gattuso,

CM

^[1]

is a prominent

breast cancer

survivor and notable Canadian

philanthropist

.

^[2]

^[3]

^[4]

^[5]

She is the widow of late great Canadian entrepreneur and philanthropist

Allan Slaight

.

^[6]

In partnership with her late husband

Allan Slaight

, Gattuso-Slight is duly recognized as a top five philanthropic figure in Canada.

^[7]

== References ==

== Further Reading: ==

• A Day in the Life of Emanuelle Gattuso

"Driven to diminish the stress of patients who worriedly have to wait for breast cancer results (average of 33 days in Canada), Gattuso jumped on-board with Dr. McCready’s precedent-setting vision to create a centre that would give individuals their assessment, diagnosis and treatment recommendations in just one day. “He explained to me what he was thinking and that, you know, we have to run a pilot program first to see if it really would work and so I was excited. I thought, ‘this is incredible.’” Over dinner one night, she informed her husband about the multi-phase project and how it would significantly change the lives of women by lessening the anxiety that coincides with not knowing. “My husband said, ‘Well what can I do to help?’ So I said, ‘Maybe you can get the ball rolling and make a donation?’ And he said, ‘Well OK, how about if I gave half?’ I said, ‘that would work!’” In addition to donating $12.5 million in 2009, the Gattuso-Slaight family began matching public donations, rallying support from friends and family and organizing events."^[1]

HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Bash007 @Uncle Bash007 @Fram @Asilvering please join the discussions over @Uncle Bash007's nomination for "speedy deletion" of the page Emanuelle Gattuso, calling out "copyright infringement" in error, rather than moving to support good editorial efforts that support a resolution in the matter. For the record, said "copied content" is presented in BLOCK QUOTE format under the heading FURTHER READING -- attributed to Stephenson, Madeline (February 15, 2012) --- along with both a sourced citation and external link to the published content. Furthermore, deleting the page Emanuelle Gattuso would omit a notably recognized subject from WIKIPEDIA HISTORY. We are here to in journalistic service, volunterring our time and expertise, to collaborate, not waste time launching unjust "editorial wars", respectfully. Now, let's work together, not against one another, I have dedicated, like you all, my TIME to the Wikipedia Movement. I would appreciate my time and work be treated with respect and care. Thank you. If I can be of further service, please ask HumanWritesBook (talk) 04:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Bash007 @Fram @Asilvering @D @Diannaa @Jimbo 05247 please join the discussions over @Uncle Bash007's nomination for "speedy deletion" of the page Emanuelle Gattuso, citing "copyright infringement" IN ERROR, rather than moving to support good editorial efforts that support a resolution in the matter. For the record, said "copied content" is presented in BLOCK QUOTE format under the heading FURTHER READING, attributed to the author with both a sourced citation and external link to the published content. Furthermore, deleting the page Emanuelle Gattuso would omit a notably recognized subject from the WIKIPEDIA catalogue. We are here to in journalistic service, voluntering our time and expertise, to collaborate, not waste time launching unjust "editorial wars", respectfully. Now, let's WORK together, IN GOOD FAITH and SERVICE not against one another, I have dedicated, like you all, my TIME to the Wikipedia Movement. I would appreciate my time and work be treated with respect and care. Thank you.HumanWritesBook (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HumanWritesBook, please stop repeatedly pinging us. At any rate, it looks like you can easily solve this problem simply by removing the unnecessarily long block quote. -- asilvering (talk) 05:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. thank you. HumanWritesBook (talk) 06:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Slaight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBC and CAMH.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot CBC is for Canadian Broadcast Corporation. CAMH is for Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. HumanWritesBook (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please rewind the rewrite to:

John Allan Slaight, CM[1] (July 19, 1931 – September 19, 2021) was a Canadian media mogul, philanthropist and, founder of The Slaight Family Foundation.[2][3][4] He is credited for: i) Navigating the success of Toronto radio station CHUM-FM; ii) Serving a significant role in the revitalization of Global Television; iii) Playing an instrumental part in helping to bring the NBA to Canada, as an early owner of the Toronto Raptors; and, iv) contributing a major part in the development of the Air Canada Centre.[5]

Slaight received numerous awards and honors in his lifetime -- including: i) An induction to the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB) Hall of Fame in 1997;[6] ii) An Appointment as a Member of the Order of Canada in 2001, iii) Declared a national "Pillar of Achievement in Entrepreneurship & Philanthropy" during his Canada's Walk of Fame induction ceremony in 2020;[7] iv) Presented the Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award during the 2005 Juno Awards ceremony,[8] and, v) Crowned with the Queen Elizabeth II’s Diamond Jubilee Medal in 2012.[9] But, above and beyond the pomp and glory, Allan Slaight is most notably remembered as "a distinguished Canadian & committed philanthropist" whose contributions continue to be recognized as benefiting the people of his beloved City of Toronto and across Canada.[10][11][12][13]

John Allan Slaight passed away of natural causes at his Toronto home at the age of 90.[14][15][16HumanWritesBook (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I keep receiving notifications that I'm being tagged in a number of articles you're working on (2, I think?) and I was wondering why you're tagging me? I'm not familiar with either article, or it's history but I might be mistaken. I'm willing to offer a bit of assistance, but I mostly edit natural sciences articles, conduct new page patrols, and add banners/article assessments to talk pages. I'm not sure it's worth continuing to tag me. Ryan shell (talk) 22:08, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @Ryan shell considering my history collaborating with you, my intent over inviting you to weigh in was to engage further collabs over the article. all good if you're not interested. In any case, please reach out should you need any additional editors on subject(s) you may be working on. If I'm able to do so, I will! Cheers! HumanWritesBook (talk) 12:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, editor HumanWritesBook, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at James DuBose, please use:

[[Viacom (2005–2019)|Viacom]]

See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 01:11, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Paine Ellsworth Got it. Thank you! HumanWritesBook (talk) 12:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help! and of course, you can use one of the other entries on the Viacom dab page if it better applies. Thanks again! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 12:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for keeping me in the loop. I am an active member in the voting process here, and look forward to upholding that role in the movement. HumanWritesBook (talk) 12:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James DuBose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramount.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot fixed. Thank you! HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:52, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Hipal (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]