Hello, Æ's old account wasn't working, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 04:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this stage, I think you may be to read wp:disruptive, as some of your edits appear to only be for effect, and you may well be wp:nothere. Slatersteven (talk) 14:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My editing is not disruptive, but it may be seen as such; my already-cooked ADHD/autistic brain sees the normal as fallacious.

Hi, so I have seen your edits. And your user page. I'm a car guy from the usa. I was wondering if you can do me a favor when you have the chance. Please and thank you. EleanorMustang73 (talk) 02:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And what would that favour be?

Nice username, too. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Add things on my user page, since I want people to know I'm a car person. I'm from the USA, my favorite car of all time is the Pontiac Firebird. My favorite Holden is the ute and commodore I have a love for the firebird as well, and the Ford Mustang. My favorite movie car of all time, is Eleanor from the original Gone in 60 Seconds. I know it may sound weird, but considering you've been on here for a long time. And I've been on here for almost 2 years, I think it's a good favor. Also, my favorite GM brands of all time are Pontiac and Holden. And hetero male.EleanorMustang73 (talk) 04:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot about ADHD. Sorry. EleanorMustang73 (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that additions man. Hopefully, I can add more in the future. Maybe, we can talk to each other more or something. thanks for the help. EleanorMustang73 (talk) 04:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to WarGames seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frenzy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Man Who Knew Too Much. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Terminator 2: Judgment Day shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Barry Wom (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently reverted my restoration of links on 2001: A Space Odyssey. I'm normally against any overlinking, however, the links to characters are valid, as they refer to separate listings in Wikipedia. The links should therefore be restored. Regards, ~~~ David J Johnson (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.

Also, April 2015? Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Embodiment of Scarlet Devil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Embodiment of Scarlet Devil you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Embodiment of Scarlet Devil for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't you TheCriticalGeneral from the AVA Wiki? Cause I'm one of the administrators there. Kjjj6uhhhhh (talk) 03:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can confirm. Same guy. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 03:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add anymore horror film related categories on the Jaws (film) article? 2600:387:F:6332:0:0:0:5 (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The article for Jaws (film) defines it as a thriller film, not a horror film. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw your edit on Fossilized Wonders, and I just wanted to ask; can the use of AI in the game really be considered a controversy? S★★★★★ 16:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, were you planning on nominating Checkers (1952 video game) for GA? It looks pretty solid, and it's pretty much the only "early" video game article that isn't one so it would be nice to add it to the set. I'd be willing to review if you nominated it. --PresN 21:28, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely planning to nominate for GA. It was the first thing that popped into my head when I first saw the article. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Checkers (1952 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Checkers (1952 video game) for comments about the article, and Talk:Checkers (1952 video game)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Salva09. You have recently reverted my edit on Mirage of Blaze. I don't understand why my edit is unencyclopedia addition. Could you please let me know which part is wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salva09 (talk • contribs) 08:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

re: [1], as I referenced in my edit summary, MOS:CITELEAD instructs to use citations for commonly challenged statements, not to completely ban citations from the lede always. In this case, view the edit history (or talk page) to see that this has been commonly challenged. Also reverting a revert is edit warring and common practice is to bring it to discussion rather than reverting what was clearly an objection from someone who has been maintaining the article. Please undo your edit. czar 10:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what is your issue with the page This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things (disambiguation). The page meets the MOS:DAB criteria, the speedy deletion was rejected and it already survived an AFD nomination, which you opened. It is time for you to let it go. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 06:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ae, please see Talk:Tetris_(Electronic_Arts)#Requested_move_20_June_2025. In general, once a requested move has been held, it's bad form to make a WP:BOLD page move, barring rare circumstances where the situation is clearly different. If you have strong feelings, you can hold a new RM, although ideally raising new information that wasn't covered in the previous RM. SnowFire (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anita5192. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Literacy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. The use of multiple accounts to evade reversion is considered sockpuppetry, for which you can have your editing privileges revoked indefinitely. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — Anita5192 (talk) 17:54, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Æ's old account wasn't working. Thank you for your work on Allan please add details. Another editor, IAmChaos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Not mentioned at the target page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|IAmChaos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 21:02, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am inviting you to participate in an RfC currently being held at Talk:Tetris#RFC on How to Define Tetris. This RfC seeks to garner consensus on whether to define Tetris as a video game or a video game series and whether to add a footnote representing the contradicting sources.

Currently, the RfC has stalled with few participants. Given your participation at the prior RfC, which had a similar question but had an inconclusive closing comment, your input would be very much appreciated. Lazman321 (talk) 01:37, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]