Holocaust denial was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 6, 2004 Featured article candidate Not promoted October 11, 2004 Featured article candidate Not promoted December 27, 2006 Good article nominee Listed July 5, 2007 Good article reassessment Kept July 15, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept June 6, 2020 Good article reassessment Delisted Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Jewish history Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative views Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Germany Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. European history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Every single other figure and topic in this section has its own article; Bradley is not notable and having 2 paragraphs on him in the "significant figures" section when there are plenty of notable Holocaust deniers not here is very bizarre. I dislike that his redirect targets here and I don't think such a minor player is important enough for such a major, high-level article per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE. I would suggest we move this material to the Institute for Historical Review page, which is what Bradley is mostly of relevance to (while technically a different organization they were very related and it was more or less a schism). I volunteer to do so if there is consensus for it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable, but I don't have an informed opinion. I note he's also mentioned under Holocaust_denial#Terminology_and_etymology. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please change:

• The figure of 5 to 6 million Jewish deaths is a gross exaggeration, and the actual number is an order of magnitude lower, with many online claims saying only 271,000 Jews were murdered.^[1]

To:

• The figure of 5 to 6 million Jewish deaths is a gross exaggeration, and the actual number is an order of magnitude lower, with many online claims saying only 271,301 Jews were murdered.^[2]

The document from International Red Cross, Arolsen, West Germany https://imgur.com/KYNU0Ut actually adds up to 271,304 not 271,301 52,389+6,507+20,501+17,842+18,259+7,925+5,570+77,727+6,920+7,187+3,944+4,785+41,748 = 271,304

Another document dated Jan 16, 1984 https://imgur.com/6ZJXbn7 gives the total figure as 282,077 H3r08r1n3 (talk) 16:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done due to conflicting information. We have to choose one number. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 17:02, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've twice removed the following material: Similarly, online, deniers often elaborate on this by claiming that the doors of gas chambers, some of which were made out of wood, were not airtight enough for the gas chambers to have worked correctly, assertion that has been thrououghly debunked. Several issues here: (1) the sentence is badly overlinked. We don't link commonplace words, and everyone who edits Wikipedia knows what "online" means, and there's no particular reason to link it to Internet; (2) gas chamber was already linked in the article, so we don't need to link it here once, much less twice; (3) it was put under Holocaust denial#United States, for no particular reason; (4) then it was put under Holocaust denial#Maurice Bardèche, for no reason I can discern at all -- it's certainly not about that person, nor about the main heading "Significant individuals and organizations". Perhaps it might be appropriate at Evidence and documentation for the Holocaust#Use of gas chambers. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:06, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I will follow your suggestions. Thank you for your criticism and for your time. Mllhnkz (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]