Talk:Anime and manga fandom in Poland

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Piotrus (talk) and Oliwiasocz (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 529 past nominations.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: "One of the first" could readily be problematic, as with other "first" hooks. Are there any potential ALTs? Otherwise the article checks out.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492: Fair point. Here are some ALTs, backed up by the text (and refs cited). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

Is there a reason the article uses "manga and anime" as opposed to "anime and manga"? Every other Wikipedia article about a general concept that mentions both has it with anime first (anime and manga, anime and manga fandom, anime and manga convention, glossary of anime and manga, etc), whereas with manga first it's only used in proper nouns. Link20XX (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I believe the title should follow the same format at the other pages. I'm gonna WP:BOLDly change the title, hopefully it's not controversial. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why were they illegal?

I don't see an explanation of why there was a first "legal" publication... Al Begamut (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Al Begamut See the footnote Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:59, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anime and manga fandom in Poland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 12:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 14:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: The article is stable, well-written, well-illustrated, and verifiable. It has WP:NOR or WP:COPYVIO. Per WP:GAN/I#R3, I made small changes by switching dates to DMY format, using Oxford spelling, and spelling out a parameter per MOS:RANGE. I am passing this as a GA. I think we could lengthen the article to get it to FA status. Good work. Z. Patterson (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]