Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kefas Brand (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kefas Brand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can’t find many in depth sources online, I believe he fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articles cited are all extremely promotional. They may well host non-paid for articles on their websites but the ones about Kefas Brand are definitely paid-for promotion even if they don't explicitly state such. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SpideroneI can not disagree with Your analysis nor agree with it. You are a bigger editor than I am certain you understand better about articles. However we can not be certain of that. We can look further into this and not base analysis on feelings or centiment. Idrisskunle (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.