Hi Tsuneoyamane! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tsuneoyamane. Thank you for your work on Microaqueous Biosystem. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This draft is written as a scientific article or textbook chapter. Wikipedia is not for any of these, it is a repository of documented information. The article needs a complete rewrite.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised my draft article "Microaqueous Biosystem".

I will be very much pleased if you check my draft, as well as my English.

Also I intended to insert two figures in my draft article, but failed probably due to my missed procedure of uploading my figures (I uploaded as files, but it should be images).

Please instruct me how to delete already uploaded my files in wikipedia commons. Tsuneoyamane (talk) 03:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have not solved the issues previously indicated. Almost everything appears to be your own work and opinion, stated without sources to verify. That is not allowed on Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Microaqueous Biosystem. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and as written it is not appropriate for Wikipedia, see tags and talk.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The concept of a microaqueous biosystem seems to be entirely the vision of T. Yamane, and I can't find any references to the term by any other author. This suggests a neologism that never took off; see WP:NEO. Also, the text of the article needs a lot of work. All of the issues in the multiple-issues template are serious, and there are long uncited passages and excessive detail for a general audience. This reads like the first draft of a review paper, not an encyclopedia entry. Please revise by trimming content, streamlining text, and especially adding references to the subject that come from other authors, if any can be found.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Microaqueous Biosystem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:56, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

Thank you very much for your comment on my draft article “Microaqueous Biosystem”.

You mentioned that “microaqueous” is a neologism that never took off.

However, I do not think “microaqueous” is a neologism because of following results of two internet data base search.

(1) I sorted the article data base of Google Scholar( https://scholar.google.co.jp/ )by inserting the key word ‘microaqueous’, restricting dates since the year 2021, excluding patents, and sorting by relevance, then 393 articles were hit, such as  microaqueous system, microaqueous media (medium), microaqueous bioreactor, microaqueous phase, and microaqueous environment, microaqueous reaction system (MARS), microaqueous organic solvent, microaqueous condition, microaqueous organic system, etc. My draft of Wikipedia article entitled “microaqueous biosystem” covers all these relevant words.

Not all the 393 articles are related to biosystem. Some articles are related to organic chemistry and physical chemistry. 300 articles are related to biosystem (breakdown is about 250 original articles and 50 review articles (including book chapters)) were published concerning microaqueous biosystems since the year 2021. When dates were not restricted (i.e. any time), 2600 articles were hit.

(2) I sorted the famous database platform of Web of Science (https://clarivate.com/ ), by inserting the keyword ‘microaqueous’, 235 articles were hit.

Therefore, I think that the technical term ‘microaqueous’ is now popular in the disciplines of biotechnology and bioscience, or in the interdisciplinary area of biotechnology and organic chemistry.

I am grateful if you consider my reply, although I admit that English of my draft article has to be improved.

Best regards Tsuneoyamane (talk) 05:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tsuneoyamane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Microaqueous Biosystem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]