The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is a Consensus and the editors have voted and gave a valid reason for a Keep (non-admin closure) Chippla360 (talk) 02:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Homeghi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not have enough coverage to meet WP:NSPORT requirements. Darkm777 (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Darkm777 (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Very clearly notable as a medalist at three different Olympics, a seven-time world championship medalist and three-time world champion, as well as a multi-time Olympic champion, who received the highest honor for Romanian sportspeople, per ru.wiki, which satisfies WP:ANYBIO. It is also guaranteed that there is further offline coverage given that she was one of the greatest Romanian sportswomen and competed in the offline era. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Olympics, and Romania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep - per BeanieFan11. Ingratis (talk) 09:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep clearly notable. WP:BEFORE was not done. Gheus (talk) 12:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep exceptional career and per Beaniefan11's argument. Canary757 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the strong consensus is that winning even one Olympic medal is sufficient for automatic notability, but winning four is huuuge. Compare this to merely trying out. Bearian (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Please provide a link to the policy or discussion about the strong consensus. I would like to see it. Darkm777 (talk) 02:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.