The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Domain (2016 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible non-notable film. Lack of notable sources in the article and none can be found when a search was done. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Reviews in LA Times [1] and Cleveland Plain Dealer [2], as well as several other critic reviews at Rotten Tomatoes [3] DonaldD23 talk to me 22:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Donaldd23, and I'd add the Ars Technica review and Sight & Sound blurb to the mix as well. (Disclosure: I created the article.) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per discovered reviews by Donald. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep LA Times is a notable source in the article alongside with others sources (WP:RS) that demonstrate notability. Fabiobengario (talk) 23:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.