Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burak Oyunda
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus that the article is notable without independent/secondary sources Nosebagbear (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Burak Oyunda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. My search didn't find anything to show that WP:GNG. Taung Tan (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep there are two interview on that article. Baran Ahmet (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- But it is an interview piece see WP:Interviews, which makes the source as primary and not secondary. In additional, no other independent, reliable WP:SIGCOV source found. Taung Tan (talk) 13:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Article has been nominated for deletion on the Turkish Wikipedia 4 times:
- 1st: February 2017, No consensus
- 2nd: September 2017, No consensus
- 3rd: August 2018, Delete
- 4th: December 2020, Delete. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 17:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable YouTuber. I cannot find coverage by secondary sources, and apparently neither can Turkish users. Keivan.fTalk 05:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no significant coverage in independent sources pretty much means no claim to notability. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 08:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable youtuber. Totally fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.