The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Dunnigan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of significant coverage in reliable independent sources, therefore fails to meet criteria set out in WP:GNG. She has translated a number of notable works, obviously, but that hasn't resulted in enough coverage of her to meet notability guidelines. PROD was declined about a year ago with the note "this has a strong enough likelihood of notability to mean that it shouldn't be deleted without discussion", but no new sources have been added. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete, as nominator. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep She merited an obituary in the NY Times and her name repeatedly comes up in the Google Books search in relation to her translations, so enough to presume inclusion rather than exclusion here. AllyD (talk) 17:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I won't vote since I created the article. I've been lax in adding secondary sources accounting for her literary influence and acting career, but I'll try to rectify this today. As for "No evidence of significant coverage in relieble [sic] independent sources", I don't know which sources you checked, but please remember that sometimes you have to look beyond the web for documentation. Ringbang (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 16:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Based on NYT article, she meets criteria 1 and 3 of WP:CREATIVE.

1.The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.

3.The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. NJ Wine 16:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC) NJ Wine (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. NYT obit alone was a strong indicator of notability, and the recent revisions carry through the claim. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Based on the recent improvements, I've stricken my "delete" !vote. I have no objection to this AFD being closed as "keep." Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and close as nominator has since rescinded the deletion request. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.