Thank you, @Langusto Tukšumi (talk) 21:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, @Tukšumi Langusto (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tukšumi. Thank you for your work on Franck Meyer Robredo. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Orgasmic Meditation (OM). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Remove the six unreliable sources and replace them with more peer reviewed sources please. f1000research, papers.ssrn.com and techtimes.com are not WP:RS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tukšumi!

I just got your message about my David Coulthard edits. I am not sure why you would think I have a conflict of interest. I do not work with him or his agency. And all my edits have had a mainstream source. He and his ex wife are divorced and he is engaged to another woman now. This is public and common information, which is why I changed that on his wiki as I thought it strange his personal life had not been updated for accuracy. If you could let me know why I would be flagged for COI, I would really appreciate it. Thank you. Ferrari F2002 (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why going around destroying other peoples work without even talking the time to read the sources that in the article??? Novadorodney98 (talk) 00:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There’s no indication of notability, and the sources consist of SEO, PR, or otherwise non-reliable sources. While it’s not your work directly, you may have had some connection with the article’s creator. Tukšumi (talk) 00:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Elizzzzz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elizzzzz. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]