If you promise me that this is the end, and all other disputes in the future will be resolved through discussion of sources, rather than emotions... I see no reason why we can't collaborate greatly in the future. I have many flaws, but one of my best qualities is that I have a very short memory :) PS, you are correct regarding the removal of Malenkov from the USSR leader section in the infobox, but I'm afraid there's nothing you can do about it...

I think the only way to get ErickTheMerrick to stop is to block him; what do you think? We already have sufficient evidence of bad behavior, which can be characterized as not following up on conclusions from discussions and refusing to engage in further discussion. What do you think?--TheUzbek (talk) 06:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't do such a thing. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So what is the solution, then? TheUzbek (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. He is very much an issue. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

nice username

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Reichsgau Danzig-West Prussia a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Reichsgau Danzig-Westpreußen. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 07:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheodoresTomfooleries, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheodoresTomfooleries and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheodoresTomfooleries during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Di (they-them) (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the pages (or similar versions of them) are restored, I will indef block. GiantSnowman 12:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s gem, but unfortunately you’re a leftcom. DFLPApologist (talk) 08:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

another kkkrakkka down... TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 08:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlimited genocide on the first world DFLPApologist (talk) 14:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_{my edits}) 15:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archive your profile’s code before the Woke Mob silences you. DFLPApologist (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i hope you're well. your userpage is really fun to read through despite it being filled with silly jokes VortexiusV (talk) 09:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kingdom of Nangchen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This seems fair. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Kingdom of Prussia § Flags (again). Please discuss here before reverting again (per WP:BRD and keeping in mind The three-revert rule) Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:05, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have added several references (citations) for an article you created. Reliable sources are a must to make your article meet the criterias of WP:NOTABILITY or else, they might get deleted. The following might be very helpful for your future edits-

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 14:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheodoresTomfooleries. Thank you for your work on Kingdom of Nangchen. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saddam Hussein. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 22:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus reached on what image should replace the 1998 image. Disputed content is on you.

I hope this helps! TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Saddam Hussein, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed content must be resolved first by consensus. Because no consensus was reached to replace the 1998 image, nor was there consensus to specifically replace said image with the 1960s portrait, the original image stays. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 00:37, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are breaching the WP:3RR rule. If you don't revert your changes soon, I will get administrators to look at this case.

You are forcing your opinion on Wikipedia, forcing WP:Original Research on Wikipedia. It does not look good. This needs to stop. TheUzbek (talk) 06:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TheUzbek!

No I'm not.

I hope this helps! TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 06:46, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will report you for breaching WP rules; there is a good chance you will get blocked.

Hopefully, in the future, you will understand that the world does not revolve around you. You can't force your opinions on Wikipedia. You clearly have no understanding of what a communist state is, how it functions, and the institutions that make it a communist state, which makes this whole conflict even more absurd. I advise you to actually grasp the study area you edit before actually making edits.. TheUzbek (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for behavior like this before. I hope you will eventually learn from your frequent mistakes. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not engaged in edit wars; I have participated in discussions. How is my behaviour blockable? Everything I have done is based on reliable sources; you based you're arguments on personal opinions. Frankly, from what I can gather, you have been reverted on nearly all pages, and still you continue. So stop pretending this is about me! TheUzbek (talk) 05:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Vietnam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 21:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Laos, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 🌈 论 21:41, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not getting consensus to change the form to 'people's democratic state' and using sources out of context to paint a narrative sounds pretty disruptive to me, but sure. We'll say that. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mongolian People's Republic. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 🌈 论 22:07, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's so crazy how I literally am and said I was doing that brah TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 22:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is absolutely not how it works, that you just blitz your preferred versions in—and then others have to impress you in order to maybe establish consensus for changing them back. You do not get to hold articles hostage like that—that's an even more egregious level of willing disruption. You have clear unifying issues here, and you did the B in BRD, now you have to actually make your case as the one who wants to make many similar changes against articles with variously established consensuses. Remsense 🌈 论 22:11, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What 'consensus'? Bring this up with TheUzbek. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 22:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Auferstanden aus Ruinen (instrumental, sample).mp3.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheodoresTomfooleries. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hungarism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'm gonna get concensus although I created one at least in that article's talk page. Fascist Italy's article is rarely at least edited by some editors. RatMan7108 (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim family. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]