Archives

Archive 1

Hello, GothicGolem29, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Council of Twelve (San Marino), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Council of Twelve (San Marino) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sanmarinosite.com/en/institutions/council-of-xii/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GothicGolem29! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Scottish Labour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• GothicGolem29, I wanted to warn you that if you continue to insist on your version in Scottish Labour, Scottish Conservatives, or any related article after expiration of this latest block, you will likely be blocked indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Why am I being blocked?? There is no consensus in Scottish conservatives so I don’t see why I can’t edit that and no one has engaged there. As for Scottish labour I tried to find a compromise by inserting organisation so why am I blocked for that with literally zero discussion? GothicGolem29 (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, GothicGolem29! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Sm8900 (talk) 14:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks appreciate the welcome GothicGolem29 (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Civility Barnstar
		For relentless civility and collegiality in what's a rather battlegroundy topic area. Keep up the good work Kowal2701 (talk) 11:02, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My first Barnstar Thanks! GothicGolem29 (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks very pretty GG. Jp33442 (talk) 13:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It took me a while to figure out how to make it like this but I am really happy with the result. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 13:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your very welcome looks like a lot of hard work but worth it GothicGolem29 Jp33442 (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah absolutely is worth the hardwork! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 17:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hell yeah Jp33442 (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @GothicGolem29, I was looking at the recent relists you made at CfD. Unlike at AfD, even 1 support in a decently small nomination with no opposition can be closed as successful. Basically, the bar for closing is much lower than other XfD venues, thanks to the less people who participate in it. So, for such discussions please do go ahead and just close them. :) Best, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If an alternate proposal was suggested by the voter though, then you can relist them to see if folks support it. Eg. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 November 5#Category:Cricket grounds in the Caribbean ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice @Bunnypranav I did not realise that the bar was lower than in AFD I will go ahead and close those ones next time(and will relist for alternative proposals as well as noms without any !votes from non nominators whoch is what I think you meant.) GothicGolem29 (Talk) 14:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks for your contributions to CfD! (your interpretation of my comment is correct btw) :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Related note, we generally do not add the headers daily in WT:CFD/W; see a comment on the same page. We only need to add headers when the sections get too long, usually 5-7 days. Best, :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so I should add any new ones below yours in the current section without a header? GothicGolem29 (Talk) 13:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just go ahead with what the script does, no manual action needed. Once in a while you can go ahead and add section. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:16, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What script? My AFD closure does not auto list there and I have no other script(thats probably why I did it wrong I was doing it manually and saw the extended headings above and thought that was what I needed to do.) GothicGolem29 (Talk) 14:36, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I am sorry that I assumed you had it installed. See User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/CFDlister. That will immensely help in listing CfDs for action. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I will get it. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 14:51, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A question I keep getting red warnings on the page it tells me to download it to talking about compromising my account with the script is that meant to happen? GothicGolem29 (Talk) 15:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I will ask at village pump as I already have asked a fair few questions from you and you have been very helpful so thanks. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 17:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Arcticocean ■ 15:04, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yay thanks!! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 16:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

~~ LevatorScapulaeSyndrome (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Schedule

• The December 2025 administrator elections are set to proceed.
• We plan to use the following schedule:
  • Nov 25 – Dec 1: Candidate sign-up
  • Dec 4 – Dec 8: Discussion phase
  • Dec 9 – Dec 15: SecurePoll voting phase
• If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GothicGolem29, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Sohom (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 14:46, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=April_22&diff=prev&oldid=1323179349

I see you recently accepted a pending change to April 22 that did not include a direct source.

Days of the year articles require direct sources are required for all new additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide.

All new additions to the DOY pages without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and backed this edit out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, it's not required but it sure would be helpful if you didn't accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 14:54, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thanks for the kind words at the end and the response! I accepted that edit based on the guidance at WP:RPC but if it is preferred those sorts of edits not be accepted on DOY pages I will bear that in mind for the future. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 15:18, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you continued to participate in the discussion at w:m:Requests for comment/Closure of Sister Project Task Force after September, which indicates that you may be interested in the related topic. You are warmly invited to take part in the discussion at w:m:Requests for comment/Sister Projects next steps. ~ Sheminghui.WU (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

• November 25 – December 1 - Call for candidates
• December 4–8 - Discussion phase
• December 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

• The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
• Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
• The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
• The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
• Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y, Z | Food and drink | Women who died in 2025 Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Global Translat-a-thon 2025 06 December 2025 Tip of the Month: Lists of deaths by year is a good resource for the December / January meet-up Women who died in 2025 Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 10:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yay it worked thanks! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 10:33, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
• Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
• Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GothicGolem29 for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 22:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 22:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wabbit (video game) on a "Video games" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 05:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, for your information, as you were involved in the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists or the RfC on consensus of WP:DESTNOT at WT:NOT, I wanted to let you know that the discussed broader RfC has been opened at WP:VPP#RfC - The inclusion of destination lists in Airport articles. If you wish to contribute, please feel free. Many thanks! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks will have a look! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 23:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure nearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors experienced in drives or blitzes and in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor (with their permission, of course) to be a Guild coordinator until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June 2026. September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for the November Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are posted here. December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis and Mox Eden. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
• Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kersploosh! on a "Video games" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 12:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

plz sign your messages [1] Ty Cinaroot (talk) 03:31, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i added it Cinaroot (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a note for the future @Cinaroot you might want to consider adding unsigned comment by(insert username) if someone forgets to sign rather than just signing it(I usually use a unsigned helper script too help do that if I ever see an unsigned comment though doing it manually works too.) GothicGolem29 (Talk) 04:29, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes - i realized that after this post. So i already added it - so people can reply in the vote section Cinaroot (talk) 04:33, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fair enough. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 04:38, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i misunderstood. whats unsigned comment - insert username ? Cinaroot (talk) 04:38, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unsigned it is a template that adds predeceasing unsigned comment by(name). GothicGolem29 (Talk) 04:42, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok ty Cinaroot (talk) 04:44, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Np. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 05:29, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Idk how I forgot that I always remember(besides once where I was not sure we needed to sign) apologies and thanks for adding it. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 04:21, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Spelling on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 21:31, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to GothicGolem29 for collecting more than 9 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 6,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GothicGolem29 (Talk) 16:51, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Iljhgtn (talk) 08:01, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points. The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026. The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive. Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants. Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points. Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Thanks for all your help closing CFD nominations! - RevelationDirect (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I do like helping out at CFD it is very rewarding. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 12:27, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:XG (group) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 10:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mount Greenwood, Chicago on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 22:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]