This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alaska Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Arctic High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Energy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?

The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.

What conditions lead to the formation of so much oil in an area this far north? Was this area previously south and drifted north over 10's of thousands of years? Or was the climate so much warmer this area supported lush plant growth at some point in time?

All of the above, to some extent. The source rocks are of three ages - Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous. Although this part of Alaska was not particularly far south at those times, the climate was indeed significantly more uniform and warmer worldwide then (65 to 250 million years ago). Dinosaur fossils and trackways exist in the Cretaceous of the North Slope. --Geologyguy 16:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So now I know that the one family living in the area are between 25 and 44 have three children, whose parents include a white person and a Alaska native. I wouldn't be pleased to see this if I were them. --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 18:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I know their family income. --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 18:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I was thinking. From the perspective of someone from the UK, to see these kind of statistics being published about a single family seems utterly ridiculous. It falls short of telling you whether it's a white husband and a Native American wife or vice-versa, but still...--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 22:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cut most of it out; doesn't really add to the article either. Abeg92contribs 18:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It might be better to show a photo or a map of the bay, instead of just a submarine on water. That photo could have been made anywhere.--dunnhaupt (talk) 14:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are the "several thousand transient workers" included in the 2010 population (2,174)? The wording is ambiguous. And if these are not included, what caused the massive population boom between the 2000 (one famlily of 5 people) to 2174 in 2010? Iapetus (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the original climate data box from 2016 because it is linked to a verifiable reliable source, and the one we had replaced it with was not. The myforecast.co site simply guesses its data based on nearby towns, and has a spotty coverage area, such that even a town that has a weather station can be missed. In some climates this is fine .... but in cold, sparsely settled, mountainous areas, this can produce wildly inaccurate data. I reverted to the original source, the Desert Research Institute, which operates the Western Regional Climate Center. Also I touched up the data, because either it has changed in the five year period, or the original author didn't pull all of the data from that source .... the original table was incomplete anyway, as it lacked the record lows. —Soap— 23:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This news might be useful for this article...

A planned new arctic fiber internet project to be connected to Prudhoe Bay

https://www.arctictoday.com/a-new-arctic-fiber-projects-aims-to-link-asia-and-europe-via-the-northwest-passage/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.82.176 (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was naive of me to expect to see a picture of Prudhoe Bay in the infobox, but surely we can do better than a photo of some place 45 miles away? Richard75 (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem like an odd choice to me. However, the article is about a census-designated place. It states that the CDP is 558 square miles in size, which is approximately the size of a typical county in the eastern half of the continental U.S. Here is the most recent map of the CDP's boundaries. Near as I can tell, Kuparuk infrastructure falls outside of the CDP. There's a Commons category for Prudhoe Bay, with a subcategory for Deadhorse. Most of it appears to be random shit from a 100ish-mile radius and not relevant to the CDP, either. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 01:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]