This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Poland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 talk 00:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• ... that there's a town in Poland which has disappeared?

• Source: Stanaszek, Bogdan (2007), "Z kart historii...", Brzostek: 640-lecie lokacji miasta (1367-2007). Tradycje – Perspektywy rozwoju (PDF) (in Polish), Brzostek: Towarzystwo Miłośników Ziemi Brzosteckiej i Urząd Gminy w Brzostku, p. 37–53, ISBN 978-83-901833-9-8

• ALT1: ... that in medieval Poland a town has been "absorbed" by its bigger neigbour? Source: Stanaszek, Bogdan (2007), "Z kart historii...", Brzostek: 640-lecie lokacji miasta (1367-2007). Tradycje – Perspektywy rozwoju (PDF) (in Polish), Brzostek: Towarzystwo Miłośników Ziemi Brzosteckiej i Urząd Gminy w Brzostku, p. 37–53, ISBN 978-83-901833-9-8
• ALT2: ... that in Poland there existed a town which has never appeared on any maps? Source: Stanaszek, Bogdan (2007), "Z kart historii...", Brzostek: 640-lecie lokacji miasta (1367-2007). Tradycje – Perspektywy rozwoju (PDF) (in Polish), Brzostek: Towarzystwo Miłośników Ziemi Brzosteckiej i Urząd Gminy w Brzostku, p. 37–53, ISBN 978-83-901833-9-8
• Reviewed:
• Comment: My first nomination, so go easy on me :)

Created by Filipny (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Filipny (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
• Interesting:
• Other problems: - AGF on the hook citations due to the fact that I don't speak Polish. ALT2 is ineligible due to the fact that it doesn't appear in the article (and also is somewhat contradicted by the map showing its location in the article). I'm not sure ALT1 is totally factual, is it really correct to say that a town that became a suburb of another was absorbed by it?

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Pass ALT0 only, other two hooks are ineligible for reasons described above. ALT0 probably also needs a minor reword, may I propose ALT0a: "... that a medieval town in Poland disappeared?". Although this isn't strictly a requirement, some copyediting to clean up awkward grammar/phrasing in the article before it appears on the front page would probably be nice. Thank you for this well researched article! 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mały Brzostek/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Filipny (talk · contribs) 22:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: AmazingAce123 (talk · contribs) 18:22, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not yet think that this article has all the qualities required to become a GA. I've put this nomination on hold until the charters is added.

This article is 1. well-written, 3. broad in its coverage, 4. neutral, 5. stable, and 6. well illustrated (adding a modern picture of the town may be useful, but is not necessary.)

It does have some issues with: 2. Verifiability. The main source is a document put together by the scholar trying to restore city rights for Brzostek, however Stanaszek seems to have been thoughtful in his research and the author of this article found some of the original documents he mentioned. Since the major source of the town's existence are the two charters, could you include a link to them directly as opposed to point to Stanaszka's book?

@AmazingAce123: Hi! Thanks for taking up the review. The link to Mały Brzostek's charter (in Latin) is already in the article, taken from 19th-century Kodeks dyplomatyczny klasztoru tynieckiego. I can also include the link to monastic Brzostek's charter, however it doesn't mention Mały Brzostek in any way, since it's a bit older and I just didn't consider its content to be relevant here.
As for Stanaszek, he's a Polish professor and a professional researcher. Writing articles on pl-wiki, I have been working with his books quite a while and they meet a fairly high standard, with sources listed. Sadly, since this topic is quite niche, he's often the first and only scholar writing on the subject. Filipny (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Completely missed the wikisource box - added it as an inline citation. Looks good to go, I'll add the GA - well done! AmazingAce123 (talk) 16:41, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Cheers, Filipny (talk) 17:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]