Talk:Longyearbyen

Good articleLongyearbyen has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2012Good article nomineeListed
October 4, 2025Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

IPA transcription

The IPA transcription in this article seems off, as I've never heard it pronounced like [jiː], only [jeː]. Can anyone confirm this pronunciation?

Orcaguy (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As of recently, the text cited Bjarne Berulfsen's Norsk uttaleordbok, which is a well-known and respected resource, albeit a bit old. I agree with you, and have taken the liberty of updating the pronunciation. Unfortunately I don't have any good secondary or tertiary sources besides Store Norske Leksikon. Some primary sources below, which I hope are not geoblocked:
arj (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Map glitch

Longyearbyen
Longyearbyen is located in Arctic
Longyearbyen
Longyearbyen
Longyearbyen is located in Earth
Longyearbyen
Longyearbyen
Coordinates: 78°13′N 15°38′E / 78.217°N 15.633°E / 78.217; 15.633

The infobox map seems to be glitching and showing Longyearbyen in the wrong place. It also seems to change location based on which map you show/hide. Is that happening for anyone else? Relinus (talk) 21:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. It looks like an issue with the SVG. Also, the standard map template in the infobox is dumb because Longyearbyen doesn't even show up until you zoom all the way out to Earth, since it's not within Norway's (or even Europe's) bounding box. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the standard map issue by only including Earth view, as the other two are pointless. There may be another view supported by the template and I'll take a look later. I've also noticed that there are two different coords given in the infobox so that should be resolved as well. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 22:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And finally, I found that there is an Arctic view for infobox maps, so I added that as default and left Earth as an option, which is I believe as good as that will get unless the the template supports a better bounding box, which I have not been able to find. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 22:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thanks for figuring that out! Relinus (talk) 23:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation error bleeding into sentence and missing words under Culture

The sentence below in the Culture section has the citation link in the text, and it seems some words are replaced. "...regularly meet in the Svalbar? ?? on match days..."

Twenty residents of the town are members of the Liverbirds Svalbard and regularly meet in the Svalbar Archived 28 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine on match days during the winter months. 66.41.47.112 (talk) 18:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAR needed template query

@Tbhotch: You added the "GAR request" template to this article in March with this edit. Do you still think this article needs a GAR? If so, would you like to open it? Z1720 (talk) 20:01, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I add the tag as a notification that the page does not, in my view, meet the GA criteria, and the main authors (or anyone) should work on it. The visible issues from then (update, cn, unsourced paragraphs) are still there. I rarely open GARs. (CC) Tbhotch 20:27, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Tbhotch: I'll open a GAR then for additional exposure. Z1720 (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:56, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited statements and an "update needed" orange banner at the top of the "History" section. Z1720 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Added missing refs, and updated history with mines' closure and recent geopolitical significance. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 17:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not Yet - I'm not convinced that several of the sources in the article are actually RS. icepeople.net (used multiple times), johnnyjet.com, a substack page. This doesn't appear to be an overly pervasive issue, but given that this is the sort of article that tends to accumulate crufty stuff, I'd rather see this looked at a bit closer as regards existing content. Hog Farm Talk 18:23, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Hog Farm:: I added better sources for Longyearbyen laws (instead of johnnyjet.com) and look for more cases of dubious sourcing. Regarding the other two sources you mentioned, I think I can justify substack page, because it's written by Joel Rabinowitz who made contributions to The Guardian, The Liverpool Echo and These Football Times. What would you say are the red flags of "icepeople.net"? It is powered by WordPress, but the article has an RS saying it's a local Longyearbyen newspaper, so it's not a blog. The only issue I see the two articles I checked don't have bylines. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 18:55, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.