Act of Accord is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 25, 2025.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 29, 2024 Featured article candidate Promoted

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1.

looks like it has OCR errors, compared with the source -- some of the thorns (þ) have been expanded to "th", but others appear as "f" or "p", and "fiỻ doun" has become "fili doun". 98.0.21.61 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The second paragraph of the lead has "King Henry, still under the nominal head of the Yorkist government, was in London"(added last year), which is not easy to understand. The lead hasn't yet mentioned who else was nominally head of the government, or the position of Lord Protector, or otherwise indicated that Henry wasn't head of state. Could we make it a little clearer? NebY (talk) 09:23, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James II of Scotland was actually killed by an exploding cannon at the siege of Roxburgh Castle, although the Scots carried on the siege and captured the castle shortly after. PatGallacher (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]