Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcuts WP:AFD/TWP:AFD/T WP:AFDTODAYWP:AFDTODAY

19 January 2026

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

< January 18	January 20 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Vaidam health

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources are all routine, mentions, or churnalism (some fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. First deletion under Vaidam Health in 2024. Possibly recreated after as it shows draftified in June 2025 with page protection added to the title. This goes back to Vaidam which has a page title protection from 2017. OP just declared PAID after being warned and then after which created this page under the variation title direct in the mainspace despite two declines of Draft:Vaidam Health. In addition to the notability concerns, the bludgeoning from UPE (now declared) should allow for yet another page title to be protected. CNMall41 (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Companies, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Poly Bridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have insufficient notability for a series page, with all sources being about the first game in the series. Can easily be covered in the first game's article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Poly Bridge (video game) and move that article to this article name. Go D. Usopp (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are multiple reliable sources that provide significant coverage of Poly Bridge such as gamespress.com,rockpapershotgun.com, thegamer.com, macstories.net and hardcoregamer.com etc .Kyunde (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
1. is a press release; 2. is a review of Poly Bridge 2; 3. is about a trailer; 4. on the first game from 2017; 5. is a review of the first game.

Three games could technically be a series, but this is not a convincing argument. IgelRM (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kelob2678 (talk) 19:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ndue Ukaj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero significant coverage located, at least in English. While searching for pages published in Albania, a few sites are found but most look to be forums or self-published sources (not by the subject). Nothing located for the Azem Shkreli award. Page has been a mess with notability issues since approximately 2011. It's been cleaned up, but still, no significant coverage located. jellyfish ✉ 19:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Literature, Poetry, and Albania. jellyfish ✉ 19:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Polish wiki has more refs, although contents differ somewhat for awards/bio. This seems like a decent SIGCOV in English. There is also a bio at [1] although with this kind of short bio, I would be wary about who wrote it (may not be independent). I did not do a BEFORE myself, so I am just commenting. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:49, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's a very realistic chance that my searches weren't the most in-depth. Tase (the author of the first link you mention) has translated Ukaj's work, so I'm unsure how that impacts the reliability. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 20:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kelob2678 (talk) 19:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoonito (Spain)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Sourced by 123movies and YouTube. Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:27, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and Spain. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There are some reasonably better refs to justify the basic facts, like [2] and [3], but a TV channel that existed for two years doesn't need its own article. Redirect to Cartoonito and consider salting to prevent kidvid hoaxers from undoing this nomination. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:16, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 03:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – subject looks notable and has enough news coverage such as Kidscreen, Señal News, Bebés y Más, and Noticias de Navarra. Maxcreator (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kelob2678 (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chaitanya Engineering College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable sources and notability to establish and pass WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:58, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:30, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kelob2678 (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Zaffar Aslam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Aviation. –DMartin (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Asif Jah Shad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Aviation. –DMartin (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Qamar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tabassum Habib

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Khattak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Inayat Hussain (officer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Saqib Mahmood Malik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Hameed Shah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Fayyaz Ghanni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from some minor controversy, seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Imdad Hussain Shah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military. –DMartin (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Giacomo Vose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Among the eight sources, articles from corriere.it and iltirreno.it are full-fledged interviews. Three of them either focus on Wishew or are affiliated with Wishew. thisdaylive.com and cityandcity.it are unbylined and one is from an unknown website. Sources related to Wishew are largely routine and lack in-depth, independent coverage. Fails GNG Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Italy. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mangalore Today

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMEDIA. No significant independent in-depth coverage from reliable sources other than the primary website itself. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Article with a single sentence/claim. Out of the 2 sources cited - Both are irrelevant, misleading the readers into believing that sources exist. Retro music11 (talk) 18:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, Entertainment, Asia, and India. Retro music11 (talk) 18:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Kieffer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There doesn't appear to be any significant coverage about this driver, just routine coverage of race results. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Luxembourg. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, if not then draftify Subject has coverage by reliable outlets: Feeder Series ([4]) and L'essentiel ([5] in French). Also shorter coverage by Kartcom ([6]), the main karting news outlet, and several short articles by RTL, the main broadcaster in Luxembourg (see article; there's a few). Depending if you count the latter two sources to count towards the 3 GNG-compliant sources criteria, then notability could be established. If not, then the subject still demonstrates WP:POTENTIAL, and a move back to draftspace would make sense given that it was only published yesterday. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't view the existing coverage as contributing to GNG. They're either very short routine stories without WP:SIGCOV or they're run-of-the-mill interviews, which generally don't contribute to notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be fine with returning to draft as well. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfenstein III

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:TOOSOON. This game is not officially announced yet and everything about it is just rumors or supposed leaks. There is nothing about this game that is official. The article does claim that "In early January 2026, the game was confirmed by MachineGames to be in development", but the sources cited to this statement clearly state that it's sources besides MachineGames/Bethesda reporting that the game is in development. But this is not official confirmation.

And while it may be possible in rare circumstances for an unreleased or unannounced game to be notable (Grand Theft Auto VI after the 2022 leaks, for instance), this is not one of those cases. There is not enough info about the game to boot to make this notable. I'd normally say redirect to somewhere, like the Wolfenstein series article, but that would imply we put information about this there when nothing is official. I say delete outright. λ NegativeMP1 17:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. λ NegativeMP1 17:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Coverage is just rumors as stated. As wiki is supposed to be a lagging indicator of notability this article should be deleted (WP:CRYSTALBALL). It's vaporware until shown to be otherwise.Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Definitely TOOSOON. As an ATD, I would be okay draftifying this until it gets officially announced. Gommeh 📖 🎮 19:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Baramma 2

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this Kannada-language soap opera, whose article was recreated after soft deletion. The sources are all tabloid coverage, not independent in-depth reviews. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:27, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:27, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping to @microbiologyMarcus, who nominated the article for deletion in 2023. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Leek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable professional rugby player. Page flagged since 2016. WP:BEFORE showing nothing that meets the notability threshold. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and England. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This individual does not meet WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk) 17:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tour 2000

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2005. Fails WP:NALBUM; barely anything to report. Red Shell Momentum 21:57, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Germany. Red Shell Momentum 21:57, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's a review by Rock Hard: [7]. --Mika1h (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect- to Böhse Onkelz discography as an ATD, not seeing not enough SIGCOV to suggest standalone notability at least from english sites.Lorraine Crane (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoconutOctopus talk 12:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Böhse Onkelz discography as an WP:ATD, one review is not enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Itä-Häme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is essentially unsourced. According to non-RS Häme-wiki, the term Itä-Häme predates the term Päijät-Häme and has some overlap with it, but is essentially informal. There is also the association Itä-Hämeen liitto[8] which served as a collaborative forum for the municipalities listed in this article. There was some proposal to develop it into a closer collaboration, but it seems to have failed.[9][10] Due to this failure, "Itä-Häme" remains a rather ephemeral concept, and I could not find reliable sources discussing it in depth. I suggest deleting this article and moving the newspaper to the base name, with a hatnote to Heinola sub-region (formerly known as Itä-Häme sub-region, but with a different composition than Itä-Hämeen liitto). Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To summarize the above: fails WP:GNG. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. When I searched for the term in Google Books, it looked like the hits were related to the newspaper. If there is any encyclopedic information about the region, it can be easily included in an article about Häme. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My Friends (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG / WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Turkistan (1718)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello, I am nominating this article for deletion on the grounds of hoaxing. The article is titled "Battle of Turkestan (1718)," yet the events described are merely a few skirmishes near various rivers located far from the city of Turkestan itself. Furthermore, the article claims that the Dzungars carried out a massacre in Turkestan.

However, the first cited source (Kadyrbaev, page 9) makes no mention of any massacre in the city; he states that the Kalmyks fought Kazakhs near the Bugun, Arys, and Chayan rivers. In reality, this was nothing more than a minor raid—an incursion in response to an unsuccessful Kazakh campaign earlier in 1717. We have no record of the course of a "battle" or any specific details.

The second source cited for the "massacre" also fails to confirm these events; moreover, it is simply a collection of primary documents.

I would also like to point out that the citations do not include specific page numbers, which strongly suggests a deliberate hoax. Онеми (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This nomination had not been correctly formatted with {{subst:afd2}}; I have repaired this. No opinion at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Kazakhstan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oppose

Hello, creator of the page here. For your first argument, Galiev and Vecihi sefa states ot as a battle, not as a minor skirmish. And on the same citation of Galoev, it was stated that the Dzungars "chopped down" the Kazakhs, indicating a heavy casualty and a massacre which is supported by another citation. Also this being a hoax isn't true, as most of the sources do have their correct pages and even if they weren't, you should have instead research or fact-check the citation id it's reliable or verifiable which you failed to do so. - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 17:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Galiev claims that there were several battles. Moreover, Galiev first writes that they "slashed the Kazakh horde," and later that the Kazakhs gathered an army of 30,000; we do not know the initial losses, he will not present them. However, everything in your article is inverted: you presented the whole picture as if the Dzungars were slashing a 30,000-strong Kazakh army. These are nothing more than minor events, and there is no point in writing articles about all of this. Furthermore, these were skirmishes in different locations far from the city of Turkestan itself, which you combined into a single battle. Additionally, Terentyev's work is the primary source, whereas Wikipedia relies on secondary sources. Онеми (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On the page 23, the page citation uses for the article states them, and even if i did make a mistake on the casualty, you could have fixed it by adding a note instead of creating a redundant nomination over something thatcan be improved. And your source claims it to be battles while you claim it was a skirmish, which is only about a minor confrontation between TWO small armies, in which that event was a battle. Also how come do you ignore the secondary sources such as Adle Chahrayar, Kadyrbaev, Galiev, Dr Vecihi Sefa and more? - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Logging off at this time, I'll respond to the replies in the morning. - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Beto Altamirano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entrepreneur and former San Antonio mayoral candidate. There are a lot of citations in this page, but nearly all of them are either run of the mill campaign coverage or articles about one of his businesses that don't really go in-depth on him as a person. I'd suggest a redirect to 2025 San Antonio mayoral election. (Also, not that this is relevant to the notability, but the article reads like a promotional bio commissioned by Altamirano himself) BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, United States of America, and Texas. Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Dahlan Nasution

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources in the article do not support a claim to notability for this Indonesia dentist and academic. They are all primary sources and/or trivial mentions (the final source does not even mention him); there is no WP:SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources. Being a dean of a faculty is not a claim to notability under WP:NACADEMIC, and my BEFORE search turns up no further evidence of meeting any notability standard. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Health and fitness, and Indonesia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Medicine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:37, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

David Bourget

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC on all counts except the last, where it's less clear. Bourget co-heads the Institute of Digital Philosophy, which is in charge of PhilPapers. However, PhilPapers is an article database, not a journal, and certainly not a major, well-established academic journal.

All of the sources given in the article are either inappropriate or not independent of the subject and so do not count towards notability. Searches give this, which has a passing mention, and this, which is slightly better but still fails WP:BASIC. Iseult^Δxtalk to me 06:53, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The reason there’s a category for journal editors is because those journals are important to those academic fields. PhilPapers is widely used and very important within academic philosophy, in much the same way journals are. It seems to be like saying the founder of JSTOR wouldn’t be noteworthy on that ground alone. What are your thoughts? RexAntica (talk) 07:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: if the founder of JSTOR were notable solely for founding JSTOR, their article would probably be deleted and merged with JSTOR: see WP:ONEEVENT. We would normally only have two different articles if both the event and the person have received a great deal of media coverage (the example given in the guideline is Gavrilo Princip, which is a pretty high bar!) or the person went on to be notable for other things afterwards (e.g. Sully Sullenberger). UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 07:35, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Philosophy, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:28, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 15:37, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Patna Traffic Police

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unnecessary content fork (WP:CFORK) of Patna Police. The current article is very short and its content can be included in the parent article without creating any article size or context issues. Ckfasdf (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Police, Transportation, and Bihar. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is the kind of obviously unnecessary page that I would WP:BOLDMERGE. Reywas92^Talk 14:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 15:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Traffic divisions are by and large unnotable for any article. I don't see a need for a redirect. Nathannah • 📮 17:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Utazzo Holidays

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on the analysis of available sources in the article and WP:BEFORE this subject does not pass WP:NCORP. Ednabrenze (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, and India. Ednabrenze (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Can you mention the questionable sources Adiflixofficial (talk) 15:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Siwet Tomar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Tv personality, fails WP:GNG, WP:ENT and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Most of the mentioned sources are from non reliable sources. Zuck28 (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, Television, India, and Delhi. Zuck28 (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but remove non-reliable sources. There are some reliable ones, though.

⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊 05:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Some reliable sources" are not enough to warrant a standalone article. Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources is required. Zuck28 (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 05:51, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 15:04, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CLdN

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article relies entirely on primary sources, but I figured there would be coverage of the company in secondary sources. However, I only found fairly routine coverage in WP:TRADES publications, which is generally excluded for purposes of establishing notability. Perhaps unexpected, but I found no evidence this company passes WP:NCORP. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Transportation. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulaziz Mashi Abdullahi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a non-notable Nigerian civil servant not covered by WP:NPOL. Sources are routine announcements of professional appointments which are based on his official bio and many of which are not reliable sources ([11], [12]) or trivial mentions ([13], [14], [15], [16]). My BEFORE search didn't turn up any WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

PO EZRI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am currently collecting Indonesian bus companies that meet a notability (WP:NCORP) to have an article on Wikipedia, on Indonesian Wikipedia. I feel that this article does not meet the notability due to the following problems:

The history of this company is not well-reviewed on independent sources, unlike recently expanded Indonesian version of PO Coyo by myself. This article relies on blogs or "official blog" of EzriTex/Ezri Group which is not reliable sources.
I also checked any magazines and newspapers documented on Monumen Pers Nasional (Arsip Media Cetak then type "Ezri" in its search box) but none found about who is Keren Indrawati, Loe Sin Tong, and their business itself.
Therefore, this relies on ayonaikbis.com which is considered as "single source". (RS?) RaFaDa20631 (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and Indonesia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal Jaiswal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He doesn’t seem to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. The only sources linking him to these projects are his own interviews, and his name doesn’t appear in the official cast lists of any of the films. There’s also no significant coverage. The Pioneer article cited is dead. Afstromen (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. Afstromen (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Preeti Barameeanant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. WP:BLP with inadequate sources. Mariamnei (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Thailand. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:40, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Clash (Thai band) per WP:BANDMEMBER. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jaishankar Chigurula (Film director)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. I previously moved this to draft space because it lacked reliable sources, but the author moved it back to mainspace without fixing the issues. The references are mostly database listings (BookMyShow, JioSaavn), streaming links (Amazon Prime), or self-published (YouTube). The only news source is a short promotional piece about a trailer, which isn't enough for significant coverage. This also appears to be a content fork of the article "Jai. C" which is currently up for deletion. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jai._C) Sisigegg (talk) 13:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sisigegg (talk) 13:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Thailand. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clear WP:NDIRECTOR fail. No notable works and no WP:SIGCOV. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NDIRECTOR, only one notable movie. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pitonga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced. Mariamnei (talk) 13:37, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can only find web listings in other encyclopedias, Grokpedia and other language ones. Article is unsourced, I'm not sure this is meeting our notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Africa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speeches of Joe Biden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is unreferenced, rudimentary in comprising only a list of links to where his individual speeches are discussed and the date of delivery. I believe that Biden's speeches are not notable as an independent topic and I can't find sources that discuss his speeches in general, rather than calling one of them "his best speech" or something like that. HKLionel TALK 16:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Politics, and United States of America. HKLionel TALK 16:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Brought to AfD because I don't think this will be useful as a redirect, nor is there anything to merge. HKLionel TALK 16:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies and Lists. aaronneallucas (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is not an appropriately compiled list. He gave many more speeches than these, and this doesn't seem necessary. Links are already in the navbox as well. Reywas92^Talk 17:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The concept of a directory is not bad. This is the reason we have Categories though. Carrite (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The content is already covered in the template at the bottom of the page. As an article, rather than a list, this fails core notability guidelines. Jcgaylor (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't really see the need for this, could have a category page for the individual articles that would accomplish the same thing. Oaktree b (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And we do. This is needless duplication. Oaktree b (talk) 20:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think I'm the only person here who sees this as a valid WP:LIST page as written, even as it is currently unsourced, as it includes links to only his speeches which are bluelinked, which is valid under our list notability guidelines. I don't share the viewpoint that this is unnecessary because it contains more speeches than are in the template, and infoboxes aren't great navigation tools on mobile devices. SportingFlyer T·C 13:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it's valid, I believe it doesn't meet WP:NLIST because, as I stated in my nom, I believe that Biden's speeches are not notable as an independent topic and I can't find sources that discuss his speeches in general, rather than calling one of them "his best speech" or something like that. HKLionel TALK 17:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NLIST does not require the group to be discussed as a set, or notable as an independent topic, though, just that it is an accepted reason why a list would be notable. Per WP:CSC, a grouping which constitutes a clearly related list of notable entries should be fine on notability grounds. SportingFlyer T·C 11:34, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NOTDUPE and WP:NLIST. The topic has received coverage[17][18][19][20]. Kelob2678 (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOPAGE / WP:TNT. The sources identified by Kelob2678 do demonstrate a pass of WP:NLIST. We could have an article here. However, this article is so badly constructed that it's an eye sore. It's an over-bloated navigation tool that is redundant of the Joe Biden NAVBOX (and that NAVBOX communicates the same thing in one line of text rather than taking up an entire page). The article currently offers no real content and takes up tremendous size while simultaneously offering no substantive prose. If we are going to have an article here, we would need either a better formatted table (rather than subsections that don't say anything beyond the date of the speech). Or subsections with actual summary content. As it is the article is incompetently made and has zero benefit to the encyclopedia.4meter4 (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The formatting would be easily fixed, though, and there's no time limit. I'm not sure I understand the navbox argument. SportingFlyer T·C 11:25, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into a bullet list in Joe Biden. A bunch of headings and hatnotes is not an article. Revolving Doormat (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Keep Useful page but add sources and correct formatting.User:Sharnadd (talk) 06:41,11 January 2026

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There seems to be no one specific format on lists of speeches. Please see Category:United States presidential speeches — Maile (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Maile. This list is not unprecedented. Azuredivay (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename. List of speeches by x is a valid list topic, and US presidential speeches tend to get extensive coverage as a set (WP:NLIST, as evidenced by the aforementioned Category:United States presidential speeches). The area appears to be undercovered, unfortunately. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Priyalaya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notablilty for actors (WP:NACTOR) with her 2 lead roles and 2 supporting roles and no significant sources. The only sources found are photo shoots [21] and besides the other one that is in the article, nothing else was found. DareshMohan (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Dance, and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-wp:NACTRESS is verifiably met with at least two significant roles in notable productions: reviews of Inga Naan Thaan Kingu and Trending do mention her performances.--~2026-22228-4 (talk) 09:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:SIGCOV. No in-depth/significant coverage sources are cited on the article, its only trivial mentions. The subject seems to belong to the country India and local language sources could possibly be available. However, currently still nothing significant to validate a standalone article. Retro music11 (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Basic ("If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability”: assessment of her roles in multiple review cannot be described as ”trivial mentions”). She is indeed Indian and sources in English are available, some being cited on the page. Other sources include other reviews, in English, or Tamil. Example: https://cinema.vikatan.com/kollywood/trending-movie-review ~2026-31842-5 (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You may additionally want to read WP:ACTOR and WP:SIGCOV, which the subject fails to meet. And 'the some sources' being cited on this page don't seem to validate a stand-alone article, bearing in mind encyclopaedic inclusion. If you believe there are additional reliable sources that this article doesn't currently cite, please add them. Retro music11 (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, she clearly meets Wp:NACTRESS -which I happen to have read a number of times- as indicated above. Her 2 lead roles are significant and the productions notable. Just claiming she fails the requirements of that guideline won’t change that. As for SIGCOV, already replied. As for other existing reviews, assessing her performances, anyone can verify and check them -you too-, as deletion is not clean up. I DID add some. Feel free to check the rest if you are not convinced. I am not going to list them all but they also include https://thesouthfirst.com/entertainment/inga-naan-thaan-kingu-tamil-movie-review/ (”Priyalaya is the surprise package in the film.There are a lot of scenes that involve the entire ensemble, and Priyalaya manages to stand toe-to-toe with these veterans.” ”This allows Santhanam and Priyalaya to break into a sensuous duet at one time, and turn into Indian versions of Ken and Barbie at another.”) [22] (”Newcomer Priyalaya, who plays the female lead Thenmozhi, is easy on the eye as she silently slips into her character and comes up with a credible performance. What strikes you about Priyalaya is that she has a sense of timing in the comedy sequences and is able to enhance certain funny portions through her subtle contributions.”); ”Kalaiyarasan and Priyalaya are mostly convincing as Arjun and Meera, but the script doesn’t do them any favours. It never earns them likes, shares, or even new followers. They’re made to enact emotionally charged moments that often land with the emotional impact of a scripted Instagram reel: polished but hollow. With the entire runtime almost entirely riding on these two characters, the writing does little to flesh them out. We are neither moved by their choices nor invested in the aftermath of their actions.” https://www.cinemaexpress.com/tamil/review/2025/Jul/18/trending-movie-review-this-social-media-tale-needs-better-algorithm https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movie-reviews/trending/movie-review/122757469.cms A minimal goodwill -or good faith- is expected even from those who vote Delete. ~2026-31842-5 (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Those are clearly PR excerpts dressed up as sources. How can one be convinced, unless we're heading to a PROMO.

With regards to your comment on good will, I'm committed to showing good faith per encyclopaedic value and not towards the subject WP:NOT. Retro music11 (talk) 16:38, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
”PR excerpts dressed up as sources”? These are bylined reviews -some, if not most, being quite negative! You don’t seem to be familiar with Indian sources. Check Cinema Express at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force, for example. Film reviews in Times Now and Times of India are generally accepted. The same goes for the Hindu. The articles in Vitakan and the Southfirst look acceptable too. You haven’t read the current version of the article, have you? The rest of your comment is not really convincing me of your goodwill. ~2026-36208-8 (talk) 18:13, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: same contributor as vote and comments above) ~2026-36208-8 (talk) 22:51, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is based on the source quality and not the location. Neither the publisher's nor that of the contributor. I'm certainly familiar with WP:NEWSORGINDIA.

Regardless of your goodwill remark and the various other expectations that you have, I'm convinced about your purpose behind this dawdling argument soon after I recommended a course of action. Retro music11 (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NACTRESS, two lead roles in two notable movies. Kelob2678 (talk) 11:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Strathfield Plaza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has an extremely minimal amount of sources so probably fails the general notability guideline (WP:GNG). Seeing as all sources are primary and not secondary, I highly doubt notability is at all implied. The relevant guideline for geographic features (WP:NGEO) says "A feature cannot be notable, under either WP:GNG or any SNG, if the only significant coverage of the feature is in maps, though rare exceptions may apply."

I suspect the only reason this article is being kept around is so it can link back to the shooting.

I acknowledge that the article could be vastly improved with much more information and citations but currently it has too little of any content to be considered as a proper fully-sourced encyclopaedic article. WP:REDUNDANT discourages this kind of article that has very little information. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Australia. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Strathfield, New South Wales #Commercial areas where this is mentioned at target as a WP:ATD and WP:BLAR. Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

SBI Card

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company does not pass WP:NCORP. Current sources are all WP:CORPTRIV, and BEFORE found nothing beyond routine business activity and company announcements. Meadowlark (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Organizations, Business, and India. Meadowlark (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to State Bank of India#Non-banking subsidiaries, where it's mentioned, under WP:ATD-R. BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to State Bank of India#Non-banking subsidiaries ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to State Bank of India#Non-banking subsidiaries ATD, and we're not the Bloomberg terminal. Nathannah • 📮 19:18, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

James Gurr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real claim of significance other than subject was almost an olympian. –DMartin (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. –DMartin (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I PROD'ed this article but it was removed. I was having a look at the sourcing when the OP beat me to nominating the article. I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV in multiple, independent reliable sources. Ping me if anyone finds anything. TarnishedPath^talk 08:18, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I seconded the PROD, but it was declined by Jimmyg141 (talk · contribs), the article's creator, without providing a reason(though I know that isn't required).–DMartin (talk) 08:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there,

I have included multiple sources in the references below. I hope they meet the criteria. Thanks! Jimmyg141 (talk) 08:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have included multiple claims of significance including the representation of Australia in 2017 as well as providing links to the necessary claims. I hope this satifies the criteria.

Cheers. Jimmyg141 (talk) 08:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the list of references, only two (maybe) appear to be reliable and Gurr is not the main subject of those. He isn't even mentioned in one of them (the one about Bett failing a drug test). TarnishedPath^talk 08:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article was created by the subject. TarnishedPath^talk 11:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Might pass notability with the bronze wins, but sourcing isn't sufficient. I think this is the same person [23], but it's not enough. Article is sourced to Youtube and trivial mentions in other articles. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sport of athletics, Australia, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:43, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was WP:DRAFTIFY. (non-admin closure) 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 08:37, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Law of Lines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON and doesn't meet WP:TVSERIES 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 07:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Korea. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 07:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concerns regarding WP:TOOSOON and WP:TVSERIES. I would like to move the article to Draft space so I can continue working on it and adding reliable sources as they become available. Once the series meets the necessary notability criteria, I will move back to the mainspace. MeloMaster (talk) 08:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sure 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 08:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was WP:DRAFTIFY. (non-admin closure) 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 08:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nine to Six

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON and doesn't meet WP:TVSERIES 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 07:34, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Korea. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 07:34, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concerns regarding WP:TOOSOON and WP:TVSERIES. I would like to move the article to Draft space so I can continue working on it and adding reliable sources as they become available. Once the series meets the necessary notability criteria, I will move back to the mainspace. MeloMaster (talk) 08:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

TheWolfWeb

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated for lack of notability demonstrated by a lack of citable sources mentioning the website outside of local news. Previous deletion discussion cited "a large amount of coverage across traditional and online media" but this did not extend beyond News 14 Carolina and WRAL, both sources local to Raleigh, North Carolina. Prettyboyyumi (talk) 07:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:18, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Internet, and North Carolina. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 09:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Bis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. All sources given are incidental to the subject; they give either passing mentions of the subject's opinions or of the subject's comments in her role as a spokesperson. Nothing focusing on her specifically found. Iseult^Δxtalk to me 06:39, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:54, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Deputy Assistant Secretary for Media Relations is very unlikely to be notable. Most of the sourcing I find is from Newsmax, very much not a RS, or other blogs/websites complaining about the current administration. Most items used for sourcing in the article are about what this person's opinions are, not really helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Preković

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub for a junior scientist with an h-factor if 23, 2.5K cites and no major awards. He has made a good start with his citations/year showing a strong increase, but it is WP:TOOSOON by some years. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Medicine. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 09:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yes: much too soon. Let's come back in ten years. Athel cb (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Mad Capsule Markets 1990–1996

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM; a quick Google search brings up nothing but the usual steaming entries. Red Shell Momentum 06:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Japan. Red Shell Momentum 06:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep because of charting at 21 & being on chart for 7 weeks. I couldn't find anything else but mentions. WidgetKid ^{chat me} 06:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Signorelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this pastor passes WP:GNG/WP:NBIO and bringing to AfD since a previous redirect by Onel5969 was contested. The sources are: brief, relatively trivial mentions not reaching the level of WP:SIGCOV ([24], [25], [26], [27]), routine coverage of his church but not of him ([28], [29]), and promotional regurgitation of his social media posts/commentary or interview content (and thus non-independent) ([30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]). His films have zero independent reviews ([37], [38]) and I couldn't find any reviews for his books, or any other independent qualifying coverage in my WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Christianity, and New York. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've added new references including an independent film review from Movieguide, which provides substantive critical analysis of The Domino Revival. The new sources strengthen the case for notability, and I'd encourage reviewers to evaluate the article with these additions. ~2026-22745-3 (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources indicate that the figure is notable to the kind of sources that find the figure notable. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Tioaeu8943 Which sources?? Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The subject seems like a known figure in the Christian sphere and press, respected for his opinions on various subjects, but doesn't really have sigcov in a mainstream sense. And the Washington Times isn't quite enough, especially as there is no consensus on it being a reliable source. WashTimes covers Signorelli's claims about a religious resurgence but doesn't seem to fact-check them, and so it comes across as an opinion piece disguised as a journalistic article. As for the sole 'Keep' !vote above, I don't think "circular notability" (notable because sources, whatever they are, find the subject notable) is an appropriate wiki argument. Stefen 𝕋ower ^{Huddle • Handiwerk} 02:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Soruced to several marginal sources. I can only find links to buy the books, no reviews, so no passing AUTHOR. I didn't see much about the films, other than the sources now in the article. Not quite enough sourcing to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Garvie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. No public elected office. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 04:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete – Garvie's predecessor has her own page and never held any public office (aside from being a school board trustee decades ago), however she had the publicity to pass GNG. I expect Garvie will, at a later date, meet the guideline too, but this is too soon and the sources are not promising. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see much coverage for this individual, [39] is probably the best, [40] is a brief mention. I was going to suggest a redirect, but not sure where, if the Federal or Provincial Communist Party article is the choice, as this person led both of them. Oaktree b (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

William Henry Hunt Gleason

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One term mayor of town with less than 1000 residents during term. Only sources are genealogy, and could not find WP:SIGCOV or WP:RS. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. EaglesFan37 (talk) 04:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, and Florida. EaglesFan37 (talk) 04:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notability. –DMartin (talk) 08:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It appears that they do not meet any of our guidelines for notability. Aneirinn (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic State – Hawran Province

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thus article is synth. The logo in the Infobox doesn’t say “hawran wilayah” which in any case isn’t the Arabic for “hawran province.” None of the sources cited mention a “hawran province” as far as I can see. They are just discussing ISIS attacks more generally. Mccapra (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Politics, Islam, and Syria. Mccapra (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alot of the sources mention Hawran. JaxsonR (talk) 23:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree that the most recent ones (2025) do not. But see the talk page as to why. JaxsonR (talk) 23:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think one of the sources used is a propaganda site used by the Islamic State. Buddy731 (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they mention Hauran, but Hauran is just the name of a region in Syria, and it is mentioned in lots of sources talking about some aspect of Syria. What the sources don’t do is provide any coverage of the Hauran province of ISIS. Mccapra (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page discussion supposes that the Hauran province merged with another ISIS entity in 2019. It provides no evidence of this and no sources. The article you wrote is almost entirely about pre-2019, and the sources you chose to provide in the article do not support the existence of a Hauran province in ISIS at that time. The whole thing is held together by supposition and inference. Mccapra (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It is absolutely true that the Islamic State merged Wilāyat Ḥāwrān with ten other wilāyat in Syria (Wilāyat al-Baraka, Wilāyat al-H̱ayr, Wilāyat ar-Raqqa, Wilāyat Ḥimṣ, Wilāyat Ḥalab, Wilāyat Idlib, Wilāyat Ḥamā, Wilāyat Dimašq, Wilāyat al-Furāt, and Wilāyat as-Sāḥil). We could try to find better sources and remove any pre-2018 operations A.S.A.P. Buddy731 (talk) 02:28, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Into the larger page on the Islamic State? Would that make more sense instead of deleting the entire page? Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mojo Hand (talk) 03:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge what? The sources in the article don’t establish that there ever was an ISIS Hauran province. Mccapra (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Architecture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks enough reliable sources to pass WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Education, Schools, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:35, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Only thing I could find was some non-WP:INDY (mostly promotional) paragraphs in a book they helped write. Delete or redirect to Navi Mumbai#Education as an WP:ATD. GoldRomean (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 02:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page doesn't seem notable enough to pass WP:NSCHOOL. Also lacks reliable sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:RS Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:22, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:32, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a Google News search shows enough [41] to go some way towards demonstrating notability. Mccapra (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agnel Polytechnic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks any sources to pass WP:RS and also lacks enough notability to pass WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Voyager Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sourcing consists of primary sources and WP:SERIESA routine coverage, with no indication of notability at this point. Niafied (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Colorado. Niafied (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and re-dir to Dylan Taylor (executive) for now. They have a plan (in the future) to build a science park in Ohio, but it's not done yet. So, I think they might not meet WP:NCORP yet, but it can be a section on Dylan's page. Graywalls (talk) 01:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spaceflight-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to me their main claim to notoriety at the moment is the (potential) future Starlab (space station), with not much else to show for it at the moment. The paragraph about the company that is already on Dylan Taylor (executive) is sufficient. Not sure if redirecting there is useful but I am not opposed to it. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅📬⋅📜 15:03, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - they raised $300+ million, so they're definitely up to something more than talk. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 02:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nomination: this is a non-notable company any existing coverage is WP:ROUTINE coverage of WP:SERIESA funding. The dot-com boom and crash would indicate that amount of funding is not a good indicator of doing something more than talk. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Viswam Engineering College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is incomplete, lacks reliable sources, and is not notable enough in general to pass WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL, and WP:RS Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, and Andhra Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:49, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MVGR College of Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems like digging deeper, all of the sources for this page come from the institution itself. This page is also poorly written (contradicts itself in its founding date), and also lacks notability to pass WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:51, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, and Andhra Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NSCHOOL, it also seems to have a WP:COI issue. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NewSchool of Architecture and Design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Has some limited independent coverage but I do not think sig cov sources yield GNG. Remaining sources on page do not help establish notability of the org itself. Googling shows some independent coverage but I do not think enough sig cov for GNG. Czarking0 (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and California. Czarking0 (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NSCHOOL. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Värsked postitused

Most Used Categories

Jüri Ratas: maksutõusud kahjustavad inimeste elujärge

Lisa kommentaar Tühista vastus