Thanks once again for doing the GA review for Pike-Pawnee Village Site. I've done a handful of GA reviews myself, and the experience has shown me that taking on a review can be no small commitment. Wikipedia's a better place for editors like you who're willing to do these time-consuming and occasionally frustrating tasks. Your efforts are appreciated! Ammodramus (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, and if only the nearly perfect articles like that didn't have to wait so long for the quick review. I've done a long one on Oklahoma City this week, where the process isn't quite so straightforward. :) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (chat) @ 17:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm impressed by the amount of work that you've done so far on the Oklahoma City article. After reading that, my conscience is prodding me to get to work on another review myself... Ammodramus (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Healthcare in Belize at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

That's a bit of a shame, as I find it an interesting article. Sorry for not offering any more than I did at the review. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 12:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Well, I don't have enough time to do any work on the article, and now that I won't be able to score cup points with it (see above), means it isn't worth keeping the nomination open. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (chatter) @ 15:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

An example of the human skeleton Hello, Rcsprinter123. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Human skeleton Previous selections: Reconnaissance satellite • Impossible object Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC) •

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
330		Nothing but Trouble (1991 film) (talk)						Add sources
5		Neshkoro, Wisconsin (talk)						Add sources
10		Granville, Wisconsin (talk)						Add sources
133		Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (talk)						Add sources
624		GameStop (talk)						Add sources
10		Cashion, Oklahoma (talk)						Add sources
9		Marion, Wisconsin (talk)						Cleanup
5		Bear Creek, Outagamie County, Wisconsin (talk)						Cleanup
64		Koss Corporation (talk)						Cleanup
10		Wausaukee, Wisconsin (talk)						Expand
29		Oklahoma City FC (talk)						Expand
4		Fairlawn, Pulaski County, Virginia (talk)						Expand
63		Aabra Ka Daabra (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
48		Northwestern Europe (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
15		Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
28		Muskego, Wisconsin (talk)						Merge
19		DeForest, Wisconsin (talk)						Merge
46		Frontier Strip (talk)						Merge
77		Brookfield, Wisconsin (talk)						Wikify
15		Barron, Wisconsin (talk)						Wikify
46		Rice Lake, Wisconsin (talk)						Wikify
113		Smooth McGroove (talk)						Orphan
3		Acting School North (talk)						Orphan
1		Augustus de Bourbel (talk)						Orphan
4		Rock Bridge Memorial State Park (talk)						Stub
2		Gray Hawk, Kentucky (talk)						Stub
2		Zuelke Building (talk)						Stub
3		St. Martin's, Wisconsin (talk)						Stub
43		Rose rock (talk)						Stub
10		Derry Township, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
2. Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
3. WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

• Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
• Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi seeing as the nominator has not responded, I will start making the changes and fixes that you have listed.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 01:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

That's splendid, I was wondering when you might get started. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (talk) @ 01:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

I had to clear some time to do it first.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 01:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

It's great; don't forget to mark each item as  Done when it's fixed. Thank you for taking over. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (talk) @ 01:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Sure no problem.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 01:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Because it is so vast, there are a large number of different cultures involved in Prehistoric Asia Hello, Rcsprinter123. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Prehistoric Asia Previous selections: Human skeleton • Reconnaissance satellite Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 03:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC) •

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Rcsprinter123. You have new messages at Dcheagle's talk page.
Message added 23:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dcheagle • talk • contribs 23:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Rcsprinter123,

We’re a team of researchers at Stanford University, and we’re interested in how editors review nominated articles for GA status. Rather than just looking to the assessment guidelines, we’re also interested in how individual editors then use these guidelines to evaluate articles.

We were hoping if you’d be able to spend some time with us, and help us understand how you would differentiate, say, a C-class article from a Good Article.

Looking forward to hearing back! Our email address is jc14253 AT cs DOT stanford DOT edu

Justin Cheng and Michael Bernstein Stanford University http://hci.stanford.edu/

Jcccf (talk) 01:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)