Hello, Eddu16, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Altos de Chipe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Orurillo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 23:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddu16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Altos de Chipe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddu16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Orurillo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Moyobamba uprising (1821). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 20:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There it says, even in the books Eddu16 (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

First Battle of Higos Urco

added links pointing to Trujillo and Chachapoyas

Second Battle of Higos Urco

added a link pointing to Chachapoyas

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Battle of Higos Urco a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into First Battle of Higos Urco. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Lithopsian (talk) 14:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of La Ventana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Tambo del Visitador. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Do not publish an article unless you provide enough sources. Moving an unfinished article to mainspace is disruptive and unhelpful. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:03, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of La Ventana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddu16! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Tambo del Visitador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Tambo del Visitador until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Higos Urco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maynas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddu16. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Altos de Chipe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:13, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have blanked and redirected an article you created, Peruvian campaign (1836–1839)Peruvian campaign (1836–1839), as a duplicate of War of the Confederation. If you disagree with the title of the current article, you may start a move request on that article's talk page. Thank you. Aydoh8^[contribs] 11:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Internal conflict in Peru - Wikipedia

Please do not readd your claimed casualties instead please discuss it on the talk page and if you wish go to dispute resolution LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Battle of Higos Urco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chachapoyas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^^ LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peruvian Internal Armed Conflict has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:REDUNDANTFORK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you've an interest in Wikipedia articles related to Peruvian history, many of which I've contributed to, which shows exactly the changes you've made. None (!!!) of your contributions that I've been able to read so far are positive. I would like to personally ask you to please stop.

This is a website that anyone can edit, but your edits are disruptive, low-quality (constant spelling and formatting mistakes), innacurate (according to the users at the Internal conflict in Peru article) and somehow hostile at times (such as your edit here, which makes unsourced and hostile claims about Freemasonry).

I'm looking forward to hearing your reply as I cannot begin to comprehend the reasoning for many of your edits. AlejandroFC (talk) 23:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Peruvian–Bolivian War (1841–1842) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Mecapaca (1841). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Peruvian invasion of Bolivia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 184.152.65.118 (talk) 01:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eddu16. Thank you for your work on Operation Cerco 99. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddu16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of La Ventana 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddu16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of La Ventana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Battle of La Ventana, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Second Raid on Uchiza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 11 § Second Raid on Uchiza until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Frist Raid on Uchiza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 19 § Frist Raid on Uchiza until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 02:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Battle of Uchiza (1987) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26 § Battle of Uchiza (1987) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Battle of Uchiza (1989) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26 § Battle of Uchiza (1989) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect First Raid on Uchiza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26 § First Raid on Uchiza until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:54, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 1987 Santa Bárbara massacre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 3 § 1987 Santa Bárbara massacre until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:07, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 1987 Lurigancho massacre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 3 § 1987 Lurigancho massacre until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:07, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 1987 El Frontón massacre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 3 § 1987 El Frontón massacre until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:08, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Operation Cerco 99 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 3 § Operation Cerco 99 until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:25, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]