User:Doug Weller

User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller



Site Map


Edits

Email



IP Rangeblock Calculator IP Range Edit Check Checkusers Oversighters

User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI

User:Spicy/SPI admin guide

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 2
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 70
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 30
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 291
Requested RD1 redactions 13
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 60
Open sockpuppet investigations 82
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

  • ~2026-35814-8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
    Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:33, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
  • ~2026-35665-7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). . DatBot (talk) 09:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 1
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 1
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 9
LLM pages 5
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 3
Other candidates 51
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Usernames for administrator attention


  • Janelofficial01 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. For a username to be blatantly promotional, there must be a link between the username and the user's edits. Consider re-reporting if a connection becomes clear through the user's edits. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    18:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Pwankie (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "wank" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    Not a violation of the username policy. Edits appear constructive. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    18:46, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • 12345username6789 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Skibidi6767 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "skibidi" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    Not a violation of the username policy. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    18:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Autisticguy67 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "autism" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Do be aware that some users who use this string may genuinely be autistic - please be careful and make sure you are dealing with a vandal/LTA first -- DQB (owner / report) 12:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Fairfieldfoundation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
  • LandenTheCtrlAltDelFan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "(ltd|pty)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
  • IyMNhatnGqfHaPdbgNgUrawvWKiIoS (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Peepee11453 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "pee[- ]?pee" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • SLG4Studios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Catchmyspoof (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: Poop. Violating string: catchmyspooph" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • JohnMLFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "f\.?c\.?$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file "FC" is an abbreviation of "Football Club" -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Imamusername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • ProTrump2.0 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Ur momi bro (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Your mom" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Not everything someone has to say about your mom is against policy. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Shesoldseashellsbythecscior (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

User-reported

  • Alfalahnetwork (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username implies shared use. A quick google translate seems to show the userpage is a bunch of religious stuff rather than promoting an organization, though. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Slccouncil (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – editing council details on Salt Lake City. • a frantic turtle 🐢 20:48, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    Being discussed with the user, since they have edited constructively. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:26, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
  • MR JOSÉ IVON MINISTRY SUPREME COURT OF THE USA "JUSTICES OF THE USA " (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 00:13, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    Wait until the user edits. Most new accounts never edit. Cullen328 (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • 67master999999999 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. 67 meme reference. --みんな空の下 (トーク) 10:36, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    Not a violation of the username policy. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    17:36, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Pkfglobal (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See filter log. Peterxytalk) 15:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    Wait until the user edits. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Falcon Entertainmentz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See filter log. Peterxytalk) 15:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    Am I missing something as I can't see anything under https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Falcon+Entertainmentz ? -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:16, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    Nope, this user has not hit any filters. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:17, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
    Wait until the user edits. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Hoteldari (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Created a Persian-language draft, Draft:اصغر ژیان دربندی پدر هتلداری ایران, about an Iranian hotel manager. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:59, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Lcupeduph (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Similar to La Consolacion University Philippines. ROY is WAR Talk! 06:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
    Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. In fact, this account has not edited in 12-1/2 years. Cullen328 (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Gjpi07 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (see their userpage). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:58, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Disruptive editing. -- Null (contributions | talk) 05:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I warned the user about edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced additions by IPs. --. Ab207 (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: We just had to remove an entire section that was added falsely claiming our publication "hired" a controversial public figure when in fact we did not. We recently published a story by that person and apparently a lot of people are uptight about it and they are lashing out against us, including making said change to our wiki in an effort to discredit our publication. We have been a controversial publication since 1968. DeadAlGoldstein (talk) 07:33, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Link corrected from Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screw_(magazine) to Screw (magazine). –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
@DeadAlGoldstein: You should report this at the article's talk page, not here. Fallback will be WP:BLPN if that doesn't result in a consensus. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:06, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: The article has been subject to repeated, unilateral removal of the Kurdish name of the town without discussion, sourcing justification, or consensus. These edits disregard established content, bypass the Talk page, and have resulted in ongoing disruption and reverts. Page protection is necessary to prevent further non-consensual alterations and to enforce resolution through proper discussion in line with Wikipedia’s consensus and dispute-resolution policies. ~2026-35669-2 (talk) 08:05, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding unsourced edit by Temporary accounts. Panda 🐼 Arun (Talk) 08:33, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:16, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated disruptive edits to add links for deleted article (now a redirect), misleading edit summaries, unsourced edits, etc. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaki Kadafi (3rd nomination). I tried to start fixing some of the issues, but the links were instantly readded. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. R3YBOl (🌲) 09:39, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yue🌙 (talk) 09:59, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of usourced material by IP users. Sciencefish (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left guide (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

  • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
    • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
    • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
  • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

You may request a protection reduction below if...

  • ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
  • ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
  • ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
  • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here

Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.


I would like to put a protection notice with detailed information due to disruptive discussions that occured before the said protection:

  • {{Notice|image=Extended-protection-shackle.svg|1=This [[WP:TALK|talk page]] is currently under '''extended-confirmed protection''' due to edits that were generally [[WP:DISRUPTIVE|disruptive]]. If you cannot edit this page and want to request a specific edit, [[WP:RFED|make an edit request]] instead.}}

This notice would be removed the moment the XC protection expires.

Thanks. ~2026-26884-1 (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Looking to have this edit placed on the Talk page for Kosovo.

The section 'History,' subsection 'Kosovo War,' second paragraph, last sentence:

'By 1996, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), an ethnic Albanian guerrilla paramilitary group that sought the separation of Kosovo and the eventual creation of a Greater Albania,[121] had prevailed over the Rugova's non-violent resistance movement and launched attacks against the Yugoslav Army and Serbian police in Kosovo, resulting in the Kosovo War.[117][122]'

I'm struggling to understand the use of 'the Rugova's' - it seems like an error. Could this perhaps be referring to Rugova and his wife (or even brother, other family member) working in tandem towards their movement? (e.g. JFK and RFK during JFK's presidency - 'The Kennedy's')

Or, is error the precedent 'the,' and Rugova was a singular figure leading said movement?

Cheers Kolcun (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

4 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Coordinates (request) 2025-12-28 19:47 Fully protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2022-02-25: "1MM+ uses"
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request) 2026-01-09 08:04 MediaWiki page (log)
Wikipedia:Copyrights (request) 2026-01-11 23:40 Fully protected (log) From Wikipedia:Copyrights: Modified by Moonriddengirl on 2010-05-28: "I disagree. It was fully protcted in 2008 for its legal concerns."
MediaWiki:Blockedtext-composite (request) 2026-01-17 00:34 MediaWiki page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:00, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
2 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:CHN (request) 2026-01-17 02:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Indian English (request) 2026-01-17 06:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:46, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

@Captain Galaxy has created 32 articles, with only 1 of those being deleted five years ago (per WP:A7). Since then, @CG has created well sourced and well written articles, such as Cow (Mario) and Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash, along with 9 other GAs. I recently reviewed CloverPit as part of the ongoing backlog drive, and found no issues. @CG has had many successful DYK nominations, as can be seen by their talk page history. I am confident that @CG's articles do not require reviewing by NPP and can be trusted with the AP right! Thank you @CG for your contributions to WP:Video games! 11WB (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I have been editing Wikipedia for around six years and have created over 100 articles, as well as many redirects. The articles I create are typically reviewed without issues, and I am familiar with the relevant policies. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to help reduce the workload of New Pages Patrol. Thank you for considering my request. Zuck28 (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey Zuck28, would you be able to explain what happened at Ladakh International Music Festival? It looks like some of your changes had to be revision-deleted as copyright violations. (Non-administrator comment) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Yes, it was due to a copyright issue. It happened in February 2025. Zuck28 (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) This attack page notice from @Fram is quite concerning. Whilst it occurred five months ago, this is still fairly recent. There is also a WP:COI warning from admin @Deb three months ago. Your recent article Kajheri was tagged by @Gnomingstuff in November. @GS is a very experienced and active member of WP:AIC, so I trust that this is a legitimate flag. This LLM notice from @Jeraxmoira in October also shows a potentially ongoing problem with LLM use. I am not going to formally oppose, but these issues definitely raise legitimate concerns around article creation. Especially with a permission that would allow articles to skip the review feed. 11WB (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Not done due to the above and recent concerns over COI/PAID editing. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:33, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Upon further reading of this reply from @BusterD, I will have to unfortunately oppose. My advice to @Zuck28 would be to focus on creating articles with reliable sources for the time being. 11WB (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Sorry @Moneytrees, I didn't see your message! 11WB (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Hello, I would like to request AWB access as I regularly add and amend maintenance categories to redirects and JavaScript Wiki Browser would streamline the process a lot. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

The reason for requesting is to use the RegExTypoFix function in AWB to make articles more accurate. And I would also like to use the "General Fixes" function to make minor edits. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk me 00:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Could I have my confirmed status restored? I am currently at 850 edits--502 are major edits. Dauntbares (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 16:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
 Not done this was just removed 10 days ago. The standard is that you will need 30 days and 500 constructive edits after a removal. Once you are at that point, come back. — xaosflux Talk 14:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, that wasn't explained to me. Dauntbares (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
You may follow up with the removing administrator to see if they want to work out something else with you. — xaosflux Talk 19:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll reach out. Dauntbares (talk) 14:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Please give me Extended Confirmed Rights Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights I want to translate pages but i can't because i don't have these rights, so please give me them. TheRealCarf (talk) 14:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

 Not done if you would like to try to translate, add "Draft:" to the start of the page name in the interface. Once you publish the page put {{Draft article}} on the top of the page, then follow the directions. — xaosflux Talk 15:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I have forgotten my password, and should my devices log me out I may be unable to recover my account, which is currently extended confirmed. I would like to ask if I may receive extended confirmed for my alternate account which I am creating for this, Phlogiston Enthusiast V2, which will be created when I get home so that the IP block from my school is not in effect. Please let me know in advance if this will be confirmed or denied. If I remember my password, I will update you here. uᴉɐʇsǝɥʇuƎ uoʇsᴉoʅɓoʅɥԀ (Hit Me Up) 18:33, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Nevermind, I have email linked to this account already to recover my password. Disreguard! uᴉɐʇsǝɥʇuƎ uoʇsᴉoʅɓoʅɥԀ (Hit Me Up) 18:35, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 18:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "extendedconfirmed" user right. MusikBot talk 18:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

I am currently an active AfC reviewer, and I would like to expand my efforts to the New Pages Feed to help maintain mainspace quality. Having the NPR right will allow me to seamlessly handle articles that bypass the AfC process. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 08:34, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in this permission and your contributions to Wikipedia. I am concerned, however, that your track record at AfD does not demonstrate a strong understanding of the relevant guidelines for this permission. I'm also a bit concerned by recent article creations for films and TV series that are based purely on pre-release coverage, and do not include any coverage of their reception, which is typically the most encyclopedically-relevant (and notability-establishing) component for media.  Not done for now, but consider reapplying after building up a stronger track record at AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 17:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
@Rosguill Thanks for the feedback and will keep it in mind. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 06:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

I would like to use the page curation toolbar to review drafts. LeapTorchGear (talk) 07:16, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, this permission is not related to reviewing drafts. Further, I think that some of your recent !votes at AfD suggest that you're not quite ready for this permission. You may want to apply at WP:AfC, and/or reapply once you have a bit more experience with article creation and deletion.  Not done for now. signed, Rosguill talk 17:11, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to help adress the backlog of the Wikipedia articles, so may you please give me permission. Thanks! SovietBias19 (talk) 00:56, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days and has 31 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 00:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
 Not done, nowhere near meeting the minimum prerequisites. signed, Rosguill talk 17:12, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I have been actively editing Wikipedia for over 6 years with 48000+ mainspace edits. I've participated in over more than 650 WP:AfDs with over 96% matching result. I'm auto patrolled and created 70+ articles. I have a good understanding of our Notability policy. As there is a lot of backlog in New Page Review, I think I can contribute in this area. Thanks! -- Ab207 (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done, thank you for applying. signed, Rosguill talk 17:14, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Hi! I am a frequent RC patroller requesting PCR rights to get some new experience fighting vandalism. I often use RedWarn to easily take down vandals and getting a new way to help out the wiki would mean a lot to me :) Thanks for considering! akidfrombethany!(talk|contribs) 18:16, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Giraffer (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I've been an editor on Wikpedia for about two years now, and I have a good grasp on the policies. I believe that I can be an efficient patroller of recent changes, and hopefully do a good job reverting vandalism across the website if given this right. Swoonfed (Ping) 23:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

The thread on your talk page (and linked edit summaries) are give me some pause here. I won't decline outright in case another administrator wants to grant, but I lean a no. Giraffer (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I have been a recent changes patroller since about two years ago and lately, I've been trying to contribute more often and more consistently. The opportunity to expand my efforts to pending changes reviewing would be greatly appreciated, thank you for your consideration. AWolfSpider(talk) 13:42, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Hello. I am requesting rollback rights to combat vandalism in Wikipedia. I qualify to all the criteria mentioned above. I have been in monthly top five pending changes reviewer multiple times and I think if I have rollback rights, I can prevent vandalism even better and make Wikipedia a nicer place. Also, I have read the Wikipedia articles on rollback and reviewing changes thoroughly. TrueMoriarty (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@TrueMoriarty although it's not directly relevant to rollback, I'm concerned about your very recent brush with copright (cc Diannaa). Is there anything you can say about that that would make me more comfortable? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
@HJ Mitchell. Hello. I deeply regret what occurred about that copyright issue, but believe me, my intentions were not bad. It was purely an accident and here’s what really happened. It is slightly troublesome to change tabs repeatedly while creating an article, so I copy-pasted the whole thing in my sandbox, where I thought I would peacefully take information from the article in question to the article I was creating. While creating the article, I was fully aware of copyright, notability, style and other guidelines but at that certain moment I was under considerable mental pressure and I accidentally mistook some paragraphs of the copy-pasted article as written by me so I just gave references and published it. It was kind of a mix-up. Like my paragraphs were there and so were the paragraphs of the copy-pasted articles and I accidentally deleted mine and kept the copy-pasted ones. Once again, I apologize sincerely for my mistakes and I hope I will be forgiven and be given rollback rights. Have good day!TrueMoriarty (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I'm trying to use WP:KIWF and MassRoolback scripts to revert a block evasion, but both scripts didn't worked. I suppose that with this permission I will can perform some useful tasks. I'm aware of rules around it and will not abuse the tools. Thanks! Ixocactus (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I regularly patrol recent changes and I would love to have more tool access for better counter-vandalism efficiency. Jiltedsquirrel 🌰 (talk || contribs) 23:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Frequent RC patroller, I'd like rollback so I can fight vandals even harder than I do now! Thanks ^^ akidfrombethany!(talk|contribs) 18:12, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights Would like to try out WikiShield to see if it will improve the experience of RC patrol G Zhong 18:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I have been involved with stopping vandalism whenever I see it. I make sure to warn the vandal as soon as I can. I am well versed in the policies and will not abuse the privilege. Thank you for your time. Dafootballguy (talk) 03:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I’ve been patrolling recent changes for a while now and I’d like to request rollback rights to try out WikiShield and other anti-vandalism tools to keep Wikipedia vandalism-free. Awesomecat ( / ) 19:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

I should begin by saying I'm not even sure this is the right action to take. I don't see myself needing to edit high-risk templates, work in sandboxes, or answer edit requests. However, several much more "ordinary" templates are protected nowadays, and I feel sufficiently established I don't want to bother others with relatively trivial changes, such as textual changes that don't require mastery of wiki or lua code. I do feel confident I won't accidentally wreck things. If you reading this really think we still live in an ideal world where only templates that would otherwise need full protection have template protection, then you should deny this request. Otherwise, I can think of maybe one instance every other month where I just left something alone even though having this right would enable to quickly fix something small, with next to no risk. Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~19k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 469)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~0, noting that there are ~5 simple/trivial requests mainly to edit notices)
Primefac (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Can you provide some examples of successful requests and examples of changes you'd make if you had the user right? voorts (talk/contributions) 17:59, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Looking at my browser history, here's a small selection of template-protected templates I've recently had reason to examine: {{Uw-spamublock}}, {{Underlinked}}, {{Archives}}, {{Connected contributor}}, {{Interlanguage link}}, {{Highlight}}. I can't promise I was involved in actually editing all of them without ransacking memory deeper, but since this is only from the last couple of months, I hope it is clear I could have made minor improvements had I been able to. I have been fairly involved in talk discussions for Archives and Interlanguage link, but I hesitate to bring those up because, as stated, I foresee mostly making less complex edits. Anyway, it happens frequently enough that I come across a protected template and can't even make the simplest change (without bothering my hard-working fellow editors) that I finally made this request. Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
 Not done as you don't meet the requirements per Primefac's comment above. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:52, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Requesting an extension to currently granted template editor rights due to upcoming expiration. Per Special:PermaLink/1301953187#User:GauchoDude, this was an initial 6-month trial. In addition to my primary needs, over the 6 months I've also been active with template edit requests over this time period. Pinging in xaosflux who granted the initial trial, with guidelines and stipulations, for review. GauchoDude (talk) 12:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC) GauchoDude (talk) 12:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Xaosflux (expires 15:37, 22 January 2026 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 12:50, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
 Donexaosflux Talk 14:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for temporary account IP viewer

Temporary account IP viewer

Hello! I'm a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer, and patroller of recent changes. I believe access to this tool would be helpful in my anti-vandalism efforts as well as identifying socks. I agree to use this tool in accordance with WMF guidelines solely for prevention of vandalism and other violations. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Toadspike [Talk] 21:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

    .

    Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
    Expired PRODs (1)
    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 2
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 9
    Importance or significance not asserted 1
    Other candidates 58
    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    No RfXs since 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

    Barnstars

    The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
    For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you!
    Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


    The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
    for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
    The Barnstar of Diligence
    I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)