Talk:Ice Peak
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ice Peak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 20:24, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: SnowyRiver28 (talk · contribs) 12:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Review
- Nominator has sufficient authorship
- No copyvio detected
- Images are valid and suitable
- Source spot check completed and passed on multiple claims checked
Lead
- Just a note here, I'm not sure a casual reader would know what a
cirque
is. Do you think a short explanation is warranted? This isn't a requirement, just something to consider as you're obviously much more experienced with geological article conventions than me.
Geography and germorphology
...one of the largest provincial parks in British Columbia and was established in 1972 to showcase the volcanic landscape.
This may be because of the source, but is "showcase" the right word here? Should it say "protect" or something else? Again, not a requirement, just up for discussion.- "Protect" is definitely a better word, but the source uses "showcase", which from my understanding isn't the same as "protect". Volcanoguy 22:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- If it's from the source that's ok then SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
...Mount Edziza area but also the Spectrum Range to the south, which are separated by Raspberry Pass.
should it be "Spectrum Ranges... which are" or "Spectrum Range.. which is".- No, it's never called the "Spectrum Ranges". What if "both of" is included between "south" and "which"? Volcanoguy 22:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Geology
- No issues here
Name and etymology
- No issues here
Comments
Starting review. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
@Volcanoguy: Great work! I found this article super interesting and engaging to read. I've made a couple of minor notes above, but other than those it's pretty much good to go. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.SnowyRiver28 (talk) 04:07, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.