At the time, I was aware of a sockpuppet policy in place, but I definitely should have read the fine print. I was not aware participation on forum was not allowed. This was very ignorant of me, and I know I'm not innocent. I have since reviewed the policy throughly and willing to work on a singular account if I need to. In other words, I just request my editing block be lifted.

I did make mostly productive edits on Lolapossum. I'm still fairly new to editing, but I make every one of my edits in good faith. Debatta was rule-breaking but I truly want to improve Wikipedia. I understand that I have abused on Debatta but One hop this time and No harm no foul have no edits at all. Yes, a block was justified but this was all very minor. I don't believe I was being very damaging.

I apologize for my actions and hope I can make more helpful contributions in the future (If I am free to). I don't need for my other accounts to be unblocked, but I still like the username No harm no foul. I would really appreciate if I was allowed on there to start on a fresh slate. I'm cutting this short but If you need further explanation I would be happy to, I had an essay prepared but I decided to spare your time. Lolapossum (talk) 03:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I find it implausible that you've been here a year, you admit that you were even aware of the sockpuppet policy, yet you didn't know what it said because you hadn't read "the fine print"? Anyway, be that as it may, you didn't in any way indicate that your five accounts were alts. And when Voorts asked you on Debatta's talk page whether you've used other accounts, that would have been the perfect opportunity for you to come clean, but instead you refused to answer. That, more than anything, tells me you intended to deceive somehow. What exactly you were planning, I guess we'll never know, but I suspect you registered those accounts with nil edits to date for a reason. In fact, therein lies an obvious question to be answered: can you tell us one rational, constructive purpose for registering five accounts? You should include that in your next appeal, if you plan to lodge one. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my previous appeal for further details. This one will not make sense without it!

Prior to my block I had skimmed through the Sockpuppet Policy, and afterwards I concluded that using a sockpuppet is only illegitimate if I'm using it to artificially create consensus. I was not aware simple participation on internal discussions was barred.

I did not "come clean" when Voorts asked me to because at the time I believed I was not breaking any policies, and had no obligation to do so. But to be completely honest: I also didn't like him all too much for closing my discussion on VP, and I wasn't too keen on responding to him when I didn't need to. I know that isn't an excuse and I should have listened. Now that I have gone over WP:Sockpuppetry I understand I was in the wrong, and resolve to be clearer next time.

I do have reasons for registering 5 accounts. I had originally created Listamajor to edit primarily on Wiktionary, but had a change of heart and abandoned it after finding Wiktionary to be difficult and unpleasant to edit. I could have used Lolapossum, but Listamajor was kind of a test account to help me learn how to use Wiktionary without the embarrassment tied to my account. Debatta is similar, I used it on forum because I wanted to avoid confrontation on Lolapossum.

One hop this time and No harm no foul were special cases of me wanting to save a username. I actually planned on a fresh start beforehand. I was planning on leaving Lolapossum for either of those accounts. I created two instead of one as a failsafe in case my new account was lost.

I apologize, you asked for one reason but the accounts were really a mix of multiple things.

I know those excuses were very weak and I admit I made mistakes. I've always seen accounts as disposable. I thought I would be fine because I didn't think I was being damaging. I apologize for my actions and I am looking forward to making helpful contributions in the future.

At this point, I recommend taking the standard offer: do not edit the English Wikipedia at all for at least six months -- no IP editing, no new accounts. During that time, you are free to edit other Wikipedia projects, such as Simple Wikipedia or Wiktionary. After at least six months has passed, request an unblock from your preferred account addressing the reasons for your initial block. The six-month break from English Wikipedia helps us gain trust that you will not continue to abuse the system if unblocked. If you are uninterested in the standard offer at this time, you can submit another unblock request, which another administrator will review. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]