User talk:John F. Lewis/Archive 2
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Sergey Brin
Sorry I haven't done much with the GA for this - real life and other stuff has somewhat intervened. I hope to make some progress tonight and tomorrow on this. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Alrght, thanks. John F. Lewis (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've now done a first sweep of the whole article and put the review on hold. See Talk:Sergey Brin/GA1 for more comments. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am working on fixing them now and tomorrow/Friday. Should all be tied up soon. John F. Lewis (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've now done a first sweep of the whole article and put the review on hold. See Talk:Sergey Brin/GA1 for more comments. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
Oliver Keyes' (User:Ironholds) defense of Wikipedia against the recent Philip Roth controversy has drawn a significant amount of attention over the last week. The problems between Roth, a widely known and acclaimed American author, and Wikipedia arose from an open letter he penned for the American magazine New Yorker, and were covered by the Signpost two weeks ago. Keyes—who wrote the piece as a prominent Wikipedian but is also a contractor for the Wikimedia Foundation—wrote a blog post on the topic, lamenting the factual errors in Roth's letter and criticizing the media for not investigating his claims: "[they took] Roth’s explanation as the truth and launched into a lengthy discussion of how we [Wikipedia] handle primary sourcing."
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
A paper to appear in a special issue of American Behavioral Scientist (summarized in the research index) sheds new light on the English Wikipedia's declining editor growth and retention trends. The paper describes how "several changes that the Wikipedia community made to manage quality and consistency in the face of a massive growth in participation have lead to a more restrictive environment for newcomers". The number of active Wikipedia editors has been declining since 2007 and research examining data up to September 2009 has shown that the root of the problem has been the declining retention of new editors. The authors show this decline is mainly due to a decline among desirable, good-faith newcomers, and point to three factors contributing to the increasingly "restrictive environment" they face.
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
This week, we tinkered with WikiProject Robotics. From the project's inception in December 2007, it has served as Wikipedia's hub for building and improving articles about robots and robotics, accumulating two Featured Articles and seven Good Articles along the way. The project covers both fictitious and real-life robots, the technology that powers them, and many of the brains behind the robotics field
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
In the second controversy to engulf Wikimedia UK in two months, its immediate past chair Roger Bamkin has resigned from the board of the chapter. The resignation last Wednesday followed a growing furore over the conflict of interest between two of Roger's roles outside the chapter and his close involvement in the UK board's decision-making process, including the access to private mailing lists that board members in all chapters need. But the irony surrounding Roger's resignation is its connection with efforts by Wikimedians and collaborators to strengthen the reach of Wikimedia projects through technical innovation.
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
Late last month, the "Technology report" included a story using code review backlog figures – the only code review figures then available – to construct a rough narrative about the average experience of code contributors. This week, we hope to go one better, by looking directly at code review wait times, and, in particular, median code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
Fourteen featured articles were promoted this week, including Dodo, along with six featured lists and five featured pictures.
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
I've checked everything from the GA review and made one minor modification about the attribution to Gmail account hacking. Everything else is in order, so I have passed the article. Well done. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great, Thanks. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
Does Wikipedia Pay? is a Signpost series seeking to illuminate paid editing, paid advocacy, for-profit Wikipedia consultants, editing public relations professionals, conflict of interest guidelines in practice, and the Wikipedians who work on these issues by speaking openly with the people involved. This week, a scandal centering around Roger Bamkin's work with Wikimedia UK and Gibraltarpedia erupted ... In light of these events, opinions on how to avoid future controversy are as important as ever. ... The Signpost spoke with Jimmy Wales to better understand how he views the paid editing environment and what he thinks is needed to improve it.
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
Following considerable online and media reportage on the Gibraltar controversy and a Signpost report last week, the Wikimedia UK chapter and the foundation published a joint statement on September 28: "To better understand the facts and details of these allegations and to ensure that governance arrangements commensurate with the standing of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia UK and the worldwide Wikimedia movement, Wikimedia UK's trustees and the Wikimedia Foundation will jointly appoint an independent expert advisor to objectively review both Wikimedia UK's governance arrangements and its handling of the conflict of interest."
- Featured content: Mooned
Five articles, three lists, and nine images were promoted to "featured" this week.
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
The Toolserver is an external service hosting the hundreds of webpages and scripts (collectively known as "tools") that assist Wikimedia communities in dozens of mostly menial tasks. Few people think that it has been operating well recently; the problems, which include high database replication lag and periods of total downtime, have caused considerable disruption to the Toolserver's usual functions. Those functions are highly valued by many Wikimedia communities ... In 2011, the Foundation announced the creation of Wikimedia Labs, a much better funded project that among other things aimed to mimic the Toolserver's functionality by mid-2013. At the same time, Erik Möller, the WMF's director of engineering, announced that the Foundation would no longer be supporting the Toolserver financially, but would continue to provide the same in-kind support as it had done previously.
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
In celebration of the 50th anniversary of the James Bond film series, we spent some time bonding with WikiProject James Bond. The project is in the unique position of having already pushed all of its primary content to Good and Featured status, including all of Ian Fleming's novels, short stories, and every film that has been released. Work has begun in earnest on the article Skyfall for the release of the new Bond film later this month. The project could still use help improving articles about Bond actors, characters, gadgets, music, video games, and related topics
GAN: Dive Coaster
Hello again! I don't know if you remember me but you reviewed the Floorless Coaster and Bolliger & Mabillard articles for GA status. I was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing Dive Coaster as it is quite similar to the Floorless Coaster article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sure. Ill get a start on it soon. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
Wikipedia in education is far from a new idea: years of news stories, op-eds, and editorials have focused on the topic; and on Wikipedia itself, the Schools and universities projects page has existed in various forms since 2003. Over the next six years, the page was rarely developed, and when it did advance there was no clear goal in mind.
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
On this day five years ago, the WikiProject Report debuted as a new Signpost column with an overview of WikiProject Biography. Today, we're celebrating two milestone: five years of the WikiProject Report and the tenth birthday of our first featured project. WikiProject Biography is by far the largest WikiProject on Wikipedia, with over one million articles under the project's scope. As a comparison, WikiProject Biography is three times larger than Wikipedia's second largest project, and if WikiProject Biography were split into its 14 subprojects and work groups, it would still make the list of the 20 largest WikiProjects... four times.
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
This week the Signpost interviews Arsenikk, an editor of six years who has brought sixteen lists through our featured list process, mostly regarding transportation in Norway but also about the 1952 Winter Olympics and World Heritage Sites in Africa. Arsenikk tells us about why he joined the project, what moves him, and how editors can join the sometimes daunting world of featured lists.
- Technology report: The ups and downs of September and October, plus extension code review analysis
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for September 2012 was published this week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month (as well as brief coverage of progress on Wikimedia Deutschland's Wikidata project, phase 1 of which is edging its way towards its first deployment). Three of the seven headline items in the report have already been covered in the Signpost: problems with the corruption of several Gerrit (code) repositories, the introduction of widespread translation memory across Wikimedia wikis, and the launch of the "Page Curation" tool on the English Wikipedia, with development work on that project now winding down. The report also drew attention to the end of Google Summer of Code 2012, the deployment to the English Wikipedia of a new ePUB (electronic book) export feature, and improvements to the WLM app aimed at more serious photographers.
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
- Op-ed: AdminCom: A proposal for changing the way we select admins
There is wide agreement among English Wikipedians that the administrator system is in some ways broken—but no consensus on how to fix it. Most suggestions have been relatively small in scope, and could at best produce small improvements. I would like to make a proposal to fundamentally restructure the administrator system, in a way that I believe would make it more effective and responsive. The proposal is to create an elected Administration Committee ("AdminCom") which would select, oversee, and deselect administrators.
- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
This week saw a front-page story in the Wall Street Journal on editorial debates in Wikipedia. The story focused on the title-naming dispute surrounding the Beatles article, and specifically the RfC on whether the 'the' in the band's name should be capitalized or not.
- Featured content: Second star to the left
On the English Wikipedia, five featured articles, ten featured lists, and four featured pictures were promoted, including USS Lexington, a ship built for the United States Navy that, although ordered in 1916 as a battlecruiser, was converted to an aircraft carrier. It was sunk in the Battle of the Coral Sea during the Second World War.
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
The volunteer-led Wikimedia Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and interested community members are looking at Wikimedia organization applications worth about US$10.4 million out of the committee's first full year's operation, in just the inaugural round one of two that have been planned for the year with a planned budget of US$11.4M.
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
A trial of the first phase of Wikimedia Deutschland's "Wikidata" project–implementing the first ever interwiki repository—may soon get underway following the successful passage of much of its code through MediaWiki's review processes this week.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
This week, we experimented with WikiProject Chemicals. Started in August 2004, WikiProject Chemicals has grown to include over 10,000 articles about chemical compounds. The project has a unique assessment system that omits C-class, Good, and Featured Articles. As a result, the project's 11 GAs and 9 FAs are treated as A-class articles. WikiProject Chemicals is a child of WikiProject Chemistry (interviewed in 2009) and a parent of WikiProject Polymers.
Dive Coaster GAN
I believe I have fixed everything!--Dom497 (talk) 20:23, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
- Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective
Unlike the long-running disputes that have characterised attempts to reform the RfA process on the English Wikipedia, the German Wikipedia's tradition of making decisions not by consensus but knife-edged 50% + 1 votes has led to a fundamentally different outcome. In 2009, the project managed to largely settle the RfA mode issue in 2009 indirectly.
- Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule
One clarification request concerns the civility enforcement case – specifically, Malleus Fatuorum's perceived circumvention of his topic ban. It has resulted in thousands of bytes spent in vitriolic discussions, multiple blocks, and "no confidence" motions against the Arbitration Committee and one arbitrator, among other ramifications.
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
Planning for Wikivoyage's migration into the WMF fold built up steam this week following a statement by WMF Deputy Director Erik Möller about what the technical side of the migration will involve. Wikivoyage, which split from sister site Wikitravel in 2006, is hoping to migrate its own not-inconsiderable user base to Wikimedia, as well as much of its content, presenting novel challenges for Wikimedia developers
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
It is well known that women are underrepresented in the sciences, and that high-achieving female scientists have often been excluded from authorship lists and passed over for awards and honours solely on the basis of gender. Also significant has been the underplaying in the academic literature, news reporting, and online, of women's current and historical contributions to science.
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
The WikiProject Report normally brings tidings from Wikipedia's most active, inventive, and unique WikiProjects. This week, we're trying something new by focusing on Wikipedia's dark side: the various regional and national WikiProjects that are dead or dying. How can some tiny municipalities and exclaves generate highly active, cross-language, multimedia platforms be successful while the projects representing many sovereign countries and entire continents wallow in obscurity? Today, we'll search for answers among geographic projects large and small, highly active and barely functioning, enthusiastic about the future and mired in past conflicts.
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
Eleven articles, including one on Franz Kafka, three lists, one image, and one portal were promoted to 'featured' status this week.
Bhopal disaster, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Gulbenk (talk) 03:50, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
There was just a misunderstanding which I have clarified. TheSpecialUser TSU 09:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Reviewer

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled reviewer rights on your account. This gives you the ability to:
- Accept changes on pages undergoing pending changes,
- Have your changes automatically accepted on pending changes level 2 protected pages, and
- Administrate article feedback.
Please remember that this user right:
- Can be removed at any time for misuse, and
- Does not grant you any special status above other editors.
- You should probably also read WP:PROTECT, since this user privilege deals largely with page protection. As the requirements for this privilege are still in a state of flux, I would encourage you to keep up to date on the WP:REVIEWER page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions! Happy editing! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
The first round of the Wikimedia Foundation's new financial arrangements has proceeded as planned, with the publication of scores and feedback by Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) staff on applications for funding by 11 entities—10 chapters, independent membership organisations supporting the WMF's mission in different countries, and the foundation itself. The results are preliminary assessments that will soon be put to the FDC's seven voting members and two non-voting board representatives. The FDC in turn will send its recommendations to the board of trustees on 15 November, which will announce its decision by 15 December. Funding applications have been on-wiki since 1 October, and the talk pages of applications were open for community comment and discussion from 2 to 22 October, though apart from queries by FDC staff, there was little activity.
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
This week, we're checking out ways to motivate editors and recognize valuable contributions by focusing on the awards and rewards of WikiProject Military History. Anyone unfamiliar with WikiProject Military History is encouraged to start at the report's first article about the project and make your way forward. While many WikiProjects provide a barnstar that can be awarded to helpful contributors, WikiProject Military History has gone a step further by creating a variety of awards with different criteria ranging from the all-purpose WikiChevrons to rewards for participating in drives and improving special topics to medals for improving articles up to A-class status to the coveted "Military Historian of the Year" award.
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
The TimedMediaHandler extension (TMH), which brings dramatic improvements to MediaWiki's video handling capabilities, will go live to the English Wikipedia this week following a long and turbulent development, WMF Director of Platform Engineering Rob Lanphier announced on Monday ... Wikidata.org, a new repository designed to host interwiki links, launched this week and will begin accepting links shortly. The site, which is one half of the forthcoming Wikidata trial (the other half being the Wikidata client, which will be deployed to the Hungarian Wikipedia shortly) will also act as a testing area for phase 2 of Wikidata (centralised data storage). The longer term plan is for Wikidata.org to become a "Wikimedia Commons for data" as phases 2 and 3 (dynamic lists) are developed, project managers say.
- Featured content: On the road again
Thirteen articles, ten lists, nine images, one topic, and one portal were promoted to featured after peer reviews.
- Recent research: WP governance informal; community as social network; efficiency of recruitment and content production; Rorschach news
A paper in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, coming from the social control perspective and employing the repertory grid technique, has contributed interesting observations about the governance of Wikipedia.
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
J Milburn is a British editor who has been on the site since 2006. He is one of two judges of the WikiCup. Here, he uses an op-ed to explain the way the WikiCup works and to review this year's competition, which ended recently.
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
The results of most of the national heats for Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) have been published on Commons. A maximum of 10 images have been submitted by all but eight of the 34 participating countries, and the international jury for what is the largest competition of its type in the world is set to announce the global winner in four weeks' time.
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
Hurricane Sandy was the largest Atlantic hurricane on record and has caused millions of dollars in damage. Naturally, Wikipedia covered it. But was Wikipedia's coverage unbiased?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
The Signpost's weekly roundup of topics for discussion on the English Wikipedia.
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
This week, the Signpost interviewed two editors. The first, PumpkinSky, collaborated with Gerda Arendt in writing the recently featured article on Franz Kafka and won second prize in the Core contest last August. The second, Cwmhiraeth, collaborated with Thompsma in promoting the article Frog, which was featured last week. We asked them about the special challenges faced while writing Core content and things to watch out for.
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for October 2012 was published this week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month. TimedMediaHandler also went live.
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
This week, The Signpost sings along with WikiProject Songs which focuses on articles about songs of every generation and genre. The project initially began as a rough outline in October 2002 and was reimagined in March 2004 using its parent WikiProject Albums as a template.
Regarding Laravel
I see the article was userfied to your space and then you requested it be deleted. I have deleted the article in main space, but I can userfy it to your space again if you wish.
Regarding your comment on the talk page when you contested deletion: we generally don't use blogs as external links, and almost never as references. See WP:ELNO. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. If you could userfy it, it would be nice. Thanks. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
Last week, media outlets reported a ruling by a German court on the problem of businesses using Wikipedia for marketing purposes. The issue goes beyond the direct management of marketing-related edits by Wikipedians; it involves cross-monitoring and interacting among market competitors themselves on Wikipedia. A company that sells dietary supplements made from frankincense had taken a competitor to court. The recently published judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Munich, in dealing with the German Wikipedia article on frankincense products, was handed down in May and is based on European competition law.
- Featured content: The table has turned
Thirteen articles, six lists, and five images were promoted to 'featured' status last week.
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
In late September, the Technology report published its findings about (particularly median) code review times. To the 23,900 changesets analysed the first time (the data for which has been updated), the Signpost added data from the 9,000 or so changesets contributed between September 17 and November 9 to a total of 93,000 reviews across 45,000 patchsets. Bots and self-reviews were also discarded, but reviews made by a different user in the form of a superseding patch were retained. Finally, users were categorised by hand according to whether they would be best regarded as staff or volunteers. The new analyses were consistent with the predictions of the previous analysis.
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
As promised, we're expanding our horizons by featuring projects that cover underrepresented areas of the globe. This week, we headed to WikiProject Brazil which keeps track of articles about the world's largest Portuguese-speaking country. The project has shown spurts of activity and continues to serve as a hub for discussions, despite the project's collaborations, peer reviews, and outreach activities being largely inactive.
Dragon (spacecraft) GA nomination
Hey, have you started reviewing Dragon (spacecraft) for GA yet? — Michaelmas1957 (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, I forgot about it. I'll start it tonight. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hope it passes the review. — Michaelmas1957 (talk) 03:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
The WMF's Funds Dissemination Committee has published its recommendations for the inaugural round 1 of funding. Requests totalled US$10.4M, nearly all of the FDC's budget for both first and second rounds. The seven-member committee of community volunteers appointed in September advises the WMF board on the distribution of grant funds among applying Wikimedia organizations. The committee, which has a separate operating budget of $276k for salaries and expenses, considered 12 applications for funds, from 11 chapters and from the WMF itself for its non-core activities. The decision-making process included community and FDC staff input after October 1, the closing date for submissions. Taken together, the volunteers decided to endorse an average of 81% of the funding sought—a total of $8.43M, which went to 11 of the 12 applicants. This leaves $2.71M to be distributed in round 2, for which applications are due in little more than three months' time.
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Turtles. The young project started in January 2011 and has accumulated 5 Featured Articles, 3 Featured Lists, and 6 Featured Pictures. The project maintains a combined to-do list and hot articles meter, a popular pages ranking, and a collection of resources for turtle articles. We interviewed Faendalimas and NYMFan69-86.
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
WMF Executive Director Sue Gardner was forced to clarify this week that proposed structural changes to the Foundation's Engineering and Product Development Department were not a "done deal" and that it was "important that you [particularly affected staff] realise that ... your input is wanted". The reorganisation, announced on November 5 and planned for the middle of next year, will see its two components split off into their own departments.
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
Seven featured articles, four featured lists and ten featured pictures – including the photograph that spawned the Streisand effect – were promoted this week.
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include the question of ticker symbol placement and the notability of various types of creative performer.
A pie for you!
| 1000+ and it is awesome! Seriously, you are far better than what I was at 1K. I'm a good cook so a pie for you. Thanks for creating Wikipedia:WikiProject Intel too TheSpecialUser TSU 06:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
On November 24, a general assembly of Wikimedia Germany (WMDE) voted on the fate of the Wikimedia Toolserver, a central external piece of technical infrastructure supporting the editing communities with volunteer-developed scripts and webpages of various kinds that are assisting in performing mostly menial tasks.
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
An open-access preprint presents the results from a study attempting to predict early box office revenues from Wikipedia traffic and activity data. The authors – a team of computational social scientists from Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Aalto University and the Central European University – submit that behavioral patterns on Wikipedia can be used for accurate forecasting, matching and in some cases outperforming the use of social media data for predictive modeling. The results, based on a corpus of 312 English Wikipedia articles on movies released in 2010, indicate that the joint editing activity and traffic measures on Wikipedia are strong predictors of box office revenue for highly successful movies.
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
Six articles, one list, and six images were promoted to 'featured' status this week.
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
Wikidata, the new "Wikimedia Commons for data" and the first new Wikimedia project since 2006, reached 100,000 entries this week. The project aims to be a single, human- and machine-readable database for common data, spanning across all Wikipedia projects, which will "lead to a higher consistency and quality within Wikipedia articles, as well as increased availability of information in the smaller language editions" while lowering the burden on Wikipedia's volunteer editors—whose numbers have stalled overall, and continue to dwindle on the English Wikipedia.
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
This week, we uncovered WikiProject Deletion Sorting, Wikipedia's most active project by number of edits to all the project's pages. This special project seeks to increase participation in Articles for Deletion nominations by categorizing the AfD discussions by various topic areas that may draw the attention of editors. The project was started in August 2005 with manual processes that are continued today by a bevy of bots, categories, and transclusions. The project took inspiration from WikiProject Stub Sorting and some historical discussions on deletion reform. As the sheer number of AfDs continues to grow, the project is seeking better tools to manage the deletion sorting process and attract editors to comment on these deletion discussions.
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1193 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
The global jury of Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM), the world’s largest photo contest, announced its results on 3 December.
- Featured content: The play's the thing
Three articles, two lists, and four images were promoted to 'featured' status this week.
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
Deployments of MediaWiki 1.21wmf5 cause widespread problems for users across wikis when HTML and CSS updates came temporarily out of sync. On the first wikis targeted for deployment, this was caused by the different cache invalidation rates for HTML (typically one month) and CSS (typically five minutes). The retrospective on the problem highlighted the fact that that the test wiki – the WMF's answer to a production environment that individual developers can no longer practically emulate themselves – actually demonstrated the exact problem that would later manifest itself on production wikis. It went unnoticed.
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
This week, we went searching for white roses in the lands of WikiProject Yorkshire. The project began in May 2007 as a way to improve articles about the historic English county of Yorkshire and its modern-day administrative divisions and cities. Since then, the project has accumulated 31 Featured Articles, 14 Featured Lists, 91 Good Articles, and a monstrous list of Did You Know entries. Despite all of the effort improving Yorkshire articles, the project has experienced waning participation in the last few years. The project still publishes a newsletter each month, monitors the popularity of and recent changes to its articles, maintains a portal, and collects resources for contributors to use.
Talkback

Message added 00:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Zambrana or Zambrano Family linage wiki
You have evaluated my work before this is an updated vertion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Itzcoatzin/sandbox
If you know anyone that has a better softawre to make better arms let me know. I am currently looking for the zambrano palace in Zamora. The goverment made it into a goverment building.
And the zambrano family from Italy. Refer to as The Royal Family Zambrano.
Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk)
Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk) 02:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
At the time of writing, this year's election has just closed after a two-week voting period. The eight seats were contested by 21 candidates. Of these, 15 have not been arbitrators (Beeblebrox, Count Iblis, Guerillero, Jc37, Keilana, Ks0stm, Kww, NuclearWarfare, Pgallert, RegentsPark, Richwales, Salvio giuliano, Timotheus Canens, Worm That Turned, and YOLO Swag); four candidates are sitting arbitrators (David Fuchs, Elen of the Roads, Jclemens, and Newyorkbrad); and two have previously served on the committee (Carcharoth and Coren). Four Wikimedia stewards from outside the English Wikipedia stepped forward as election scrutineers: Pundit, from the Polish Wikipedia; Teles, from the Portuguese Wikipedia; Quentinv57, from the French Wikipedia; and Mardetanha, from the Persian Wikipedia. The scrutineers' task is to ensure that the election is free of multiple votes from the same person, to tally the results, and to announce them. The full results are expected to be released within the next few days and will be reported in next week's edition of the Signpost.
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
Eight articles, four images, six lists, and one topic were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week.
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
The Visual Editor project – an attempt to create the first WMF-deployable WYSIWYG editor – will go live on its first Wikipedias imminently following nearly six months of testing on MediaWiki.org. A full explanatory blog post accompanied the news, explaining the project and its setup. Once a user has opted-in, the editor can handle basic formatting, headings and lists, while safely ignoring elements it is yet to understand, including references, categories, templates, tables and images. At the last count, approximately 2% of pages would break in some way if a user tried the Visual Editor on them; it is unclear whether any specific protection will be put in place beyond relying on editors to spot problems.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
In celebration of Human Rights Day, we checked out WikiProject Human Rights. Started in February 2006, the project has grown to include over 3,000 articles, including 12 Featured Articles, 3 Featured Lists, 66 Good Articles, a large collection of Did You Know entries, and a few mentions "in the news". The project monitors listings of popular pages and cleanup tags. We interviewed Khazar2, Cirt, and Boud.
Your Arbitration Committee Election Vote
Hello John F. Lewis,
You recently voted in the Arbitration Committee Elections. In accordance to the Request for comment on the election process, you must have made 150 edits in the main article space of Wikipedia before November 1st in order to be eligible to vote. According to a recent count, you may not have met that criterion (some edits were since deleted). If you believe we are in error, or there are other circumstances, such as a number of edits across multiple accounts, please let us know. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies Reaper Eternal, at the time in question I mis calculated the actual number of main space edits. However I have enough to vote next time it comes around. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Greetings from 'Ferwert'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferwert (talk • contribs) 04:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Hello John I made an attempt at acquiring the necessary expertise to write and/or revise in Wikipedia, but give up John. My primary interest was to rectify a blatant piece of propaganda from one side of the Thailand Political Divide, under the heading "2010 Thai Political Protests". And I want to thank you for offering to be my mentor. I really appreciated that. But the work needed to "get myself up to speed" just isn't worth it, considering my interest in balancing out articles that are singularly focussed on Political reporting from Thailand. You can read my exchange with the guy that wrote the above noted article, who I know is an operative from that side of the political divide. He is on many other English language discussion forumns full time. For your information however, I played around with some of the lessons you sent me. Below is a partial record of that. Thx. again for your help John, and I will let the biased reportage on the "2010 Thai Political Protests" remain on Wikipedia. Bye for now Ferwert
- Thanks for informing me Ferwert, I'll deal with your page now. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
A:1909 in Canadian football From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Grey Cup Championship December 4 1st Annual Grey Cup Game: Rosedale Field – Toronto, Ontario
Toronto Varsity Blues 26 Toronto Parkdale Canoe Club 6
Toronto Varsity Blues are the 1909 Grey Cup Champions
< 99th Grey Cup
101st Grey Cup >
B: The 100th Grey Cup was a Canadian football game between the East Division champion Toronto Argonauts and the West Division champion Calgary Stampeders to decide the champion of the Canadian Football League in the 2012 season.
The game took place on Sunday, November 25, 2012, at Rogers Centre in Toronto, Ontario.[2] This was the fourth Grey Cup game played at Rogers Centre, and the 46th in the city of Toronto.
The Argonauts defeated the Stampeders 35–22 to win their sixteenth Grey Cup title.[3][4]
This was the third meeting between Calgary and Toronto for the Grey Cup championship and the first since the 79th Grey Cup in 1991. This was also the second consecutive year that the Grey Cup game was won by the team from the host city. The result of the game also meant that Argonauts owner David Braley became the first team owner to win back-to-back Grey Cups with two different teams; Braley also owns the 2011 champions, the BC Lions.[5] Over 5.8 million viewers watched the game, with roughly 5.5 million originating from English Canada, making the game the most-watched Grey Cup ever recorded on English-language television.[6]
Following the game, Toronto running back Chad Kackert was named the Most Valuable Player.[7] His teammate, defensive end Ricky Foley received the Dick Suderman Trophy as the Most Valuable Canadian.[8]
Clean-up notes – A discrepancy was noted in Wikipedia.
• In entry “A” above, it was noted that the first Grey Cup was awarded in 1909
• In entry “B” above, the 2012 Grey Cup game was featured as being the 100th. Grey Cup Game.
• Suggested alteration as follows, shown in red.
The 100th Grey Cup was a Canadian football game between the East Division champion Toronto Argonauts and the West Division champion Calgary Stampeders to decide the champion of the Canadian Football League in the 2012 season.
The 100th Grey Cup of the modern era Canadian Football League between the East Division champion Toronto Argonauts and the West Division champion Calgary Stampeders to decide the championship of Canadian Football for the 2012 season, was held on November 25, 2012.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2010 AHL All-Star Game 2010 American Hockey League All-Star Game From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. (February 2010)
This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (February 2010)
The 2010 participants
The 2010 American Hockey League All-Star Game was held on January 18–January 19, 2010 at Cumberland County Civic Center, in Portland, Maine. Where Canadian AHL All-Stars completed a sweep of the 2010 Time Warner Cable AHL All-Star Classic with a come-from-behind 10-9 shootout win over PlanetUSA.[1]
The AHL All-Star game is made up of the top AHL prospects
The 2010 American Hockey League (AHL) All-Star weekend was held on January 18-19th, at Cumberland County Civic center in Portland, Maine. The Canadian All-Stars swept the three game series with a come-from-behind 10-9 shootout win over the American All-Stars. The tournament was sponsored by Time Warner Cable.
2010 AFC Cup knockout stage
?
This title is most non-descriptive. What is the “AFC”? I was attracted to the article thinking it was about the American Football Conference of the National Football League. The introductory, or ‘Lead Section” does nothing to clarify this, nor provide a summary of its’ major aspects.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The lead section of this article may need to be rewritten. The reason given is: Lead contains only a Main article link. Please discuss this issue on the talk page and read the layout guide to make sure the section will be inclusive of all essential details. (May 2010)
Main article: 2010 AFC Cup Contents [hide] • 1 Bracket • 2 Round of 16 • 3 Quarter-finals o 3.1 First leg o 3.2 Second leg • 4 Semi-finals o 4.1 First leg o 4.2 Second leg • 5 Final • 6 References
[edit] Bracket Note: while the bracket below shows the entire knockout stage, the draw for the round of 16 matches was determined at the time of the group draw. The draw for the quarter-finals and beyond was held separately, after the conclusion of the round of 16. Because of the country protection rule, if there are two clubs from the same country, they will not face each other in the quarter-finals. Therefore, the two clubs from Syria, Kuwait, and Thailand may not be drawn with each other in the quarter-finals.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferwert (talk • contribs) 04:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
CSD:G12 on Marty Ashby
I've declined the CSD:G12 (Copyright) nomination on the above mentioned article. You did nothing wrong, however it was revealed that the author of the article was contracted by the subject (and provided copy) to write the article. I've tagged it with the COI tag and given the author guidance about how to resolve the Copyright concerns. Thank you for your effort, but I didn't nominate it for G12 because there was enough different to make the nomination not blatantly obvious. Hasteur (talk) 22:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Alright. Thanks for proving your rationale for declining. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hand-coding
Hey all :).
I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).
You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyes
wikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).
If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter |
|---|
Talkback

Message added 07:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 07:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Non-admin closure
I undid your relisting of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Baltimore Orioles Opening Day starting lineups. This does not seem to fall under WP:NACD. With the number of participants in the AfD, it seems like an admin could make a close call or even rule "no consensus". The essay WP:NAC only recommends relisting "AfDs with little or no discussion may be relisted if they're relatively new". WP:RELISTINGISEVIL provides a rationale. Let me know if you have any concerns. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies for this. Must have been a slip up from me. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- No prob.—Bagumba (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
Seven days after the close of voting, the results of the recent Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) elections have been announced by two of the four stewards overseeing the election, Mardetanha and Pundit. Of the 21 candidates, 13 managed to gain positive support-to-oppose ratios, and the top eight will be appointed to two-year terms on the committee by Jimbo Wales, exercising one of his traditional responsibilities.
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
In the past year, we've tried to expand our horizons by looking at how WikiProjects work in other languages of Wikipedia. Following in the footsteps of our previously interviewed Czech and French projects, we visited the German Wikipedia to explore WikiProjekt Computerspiel (WikiProject Computer Games). The project dates back to November 2004 and has become the back-end of the Computer Games Portal, which covers all video games regardless of platform. Editors writing about computer games at the German Wikipedia deal with unique cultural and legal challenges, ranging from a lack of fair use precedents to the limited availability of games deemed harmful for youths to strong standards for the inclusion of material on the German Wikipedia.
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
This week's big story on the English Wikipedia is obviously the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (which, by the time you read this, may be renamed 2012 Connecticut school shooting). Quickly created and nominated for deletion not once but twice, and both times speedily kept, the article saw the expected flurry of edits (a look at the history suggests an average of at least one a minute over the first day and a half) and more than half a million page views on the first full day.
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
Four articles, three lists, and five images were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week, including a picture of a three-week old donkey (also known as an 'ass').
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
MediaWiki users (including Wikimedians) can now organise themselves into groups, receiving recognition and support-in-kind from the Wikimedia Foundation. The project, backed by new Wikimedia technical contributor coordinator Quim Gil, has seen five proposals lodged in its first week of operation. The idea of MediaWiki groups mimics that of Wikimedia User Groups.
I have no vandalise
Post the vandalism on page Jonkerz (talk) --FROESES (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- To me your edits appear to be vandalism. What does not support your case is your fourth revert. Regardless of vandalism or not, reverting more than three times is inappropriate. If you have a problem, Please take it up with the editor and if you are doing non vandalism edits, The user would see they are in the wrong and revert their revert. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Relisting AfD's
I noticed you relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 157 after a substantial amount of discussion. Thanks for helping out, but this was not a proper relist. Please read WP:RELIST when you have a moment. Relisting is for AfD's that lack sufficient participation. When you relisted that AfD, it had pages of discussion and over two dozen contributors. When AfD's like that are relisted, it can cause problems, up to and including the invalidation of the AfD in some cases. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Thanks. ‑Scottywong| comment _ 16:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies. This was done around the time of the previous case (See a few above) and it was a slip up. I should have reviewed all actions I did around the above case. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your help. By the way, you are free to "hey" me all you want ;) jonkerz ♠talk 23:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I was correcting the lower case 'h' and I thought while I am there, I might as well make it formal as then and there I was doing a technical NAC to you AN/I report. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- News and notes: Debates on Meta sparking along—grants, new entities, and conflicts of interest
As part of its new focus on core responsibilities, the Wikimedia Foundation is reforming its grant schemes so that they are more accessible to individual volunteers. The community is invited to look at proposals for a new scheme—for now called Individual engagement grants (IEGs)—which is due to kick off on January 15. On Meta, the community is once again debating the two new offline participation models—user groups (open membership groups designed to be easy to form) and thematic organizations (incorporated non-profits representing the Wikimedia movement and supporting work on a specific theme within or across countries). In a consultation process on Meta that will last until January 15, the community will be discussing WMF proposals for a new guideline on conflicts of interests concerning Wikimedia resources. The draft covers COI issues for both volunteers and organizations across the movement.
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject A Song of Ice and Fire, which focuses on the eponymous series of high fantasy literature, the television series Game of Thrones, and related works by George R. R. Martin. The project was started in July 2006 and has grown to include 11 Good Articles maintained by a small yet enthusiastic band of editors.
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
Seven articles and two lists were promoted to 'featured' status this week, including List of battlecruisers. The article covers all of the battlecruisers—which were a type of warship similar in size to a battleship but with several defining characteristics—ever planned or constructed. The last British battlecruiser built, HMS Hood, is pictured at right.
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
Efforts were stepped up this week to sow a feeling of trust between the major parties with an interest in the future of the Toolserver. The tool- and bot-hosting server – more accurately servers – are currently operated by German chapter, Wikimedia Germany, with assistance from the Foundation and numerous volunteers, including long-time system administrator Daniel Baur (more commonly known by his pseudonym DaB). However, those parties have more recently failed to see eye-to-eye on the trajectory for the Toolserver, which is scheduled to be replaced by Wikimedia Labs in late 2013, with increasing concern about the tone of discussions.
Inquiry
Did you manually tally Darkwind's AfD !votes to result or is there a handy tool for this? Mkdwtalk 03:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- There is a template I used, if I am correct in your request it is the template 'RfA tally'. John F. Lewis (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Wait if you are on about the template in the table, check out the Crat Noticebord John F. Lewis (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- I meant WP:AFD tally not RfA tally. "In AfD, 91% of his votes matched the closing consensus." Mkdwtalk 03:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
In the impersonal, detached Colosseum that is Wikipedia, people find it much easier to put their thumbs down. As such, many people active in the Wikimedia movement have witnessed a precipitous decline in civil discourse. This is far from a new trend, yet many people would agree that it all seemed somehow worse in 2012.
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
A recent, poorly researched and poorly written story in the Register highlighted the perceived "cash rich" status of the Wikimedia movement. ... The Telegraph and Daily Dot, among others, have alleged that there are multiple links between the WMF, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, and Kazakhstan's government, which is, for all intents and purposes, a one-party non-democratic state.
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
On 27 December the Wikimedia Foundation announced the conclusion of their ninth annual fundraiser, which attracted more than 1.2 million donors. The appeal reached its goal of US$25 million, even though fundraising banners ran for only nine days.
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
In the first of two features, the Signpost this week looks back on 2012, a year when developers finally made inroads into three issues that had been put off for far too long (the need for editors to learn wiki-markup, the lack of a proper template language and the centralisation of data) but left all three projects far from finished.
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
- Interview: Interview with Brion Vibber, the WMF's first employee
Brion Vibber has been a Wikipedia editor for nearly 11 years and was the first person officially hired to work for the Wikimedia Foundation. He was instrumental in early development of the MediaWiki software and is now the lead software architect for the foundation's mobile development team.
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
At the beginning of the year, we began a series of interviews with editors who have worked hard to combat systemic bias through the creation of featured content; although we haven't seen six installments yet, we've also had some delightful interviews with people who write articles on some of our most core topics. Now, as we close the year, I would like to present some of my own musings on the state of featured content—especially as it pertains to systemic bias and core topics.
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
This week, we're celebrating the New Year from Times Square by interviewing WikiProject New York City. Since December 2004, WikiProject NYC has had the difficult task of maintaining articles about the largest city in the United States, many of which are also among the the most viewed articles on Wikipedia. The project is home to 22 Featured Articles, 7 Featured Lists, 32 pieces of Featured Media, and a lengthy list of Did You Know? entries.
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
Northeastern University researcher Brian Keegan analyzed the gathering of hundreds of Wikipedians to cover the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy. ... A First Monday article reviews several aspects of the Wikipedia participation in the 18 January 2012, protests against SOPA and PIPA legislation in the USA. The paper focuses on the question of legitimacy, looking at how the Wikipedia community arrived at the decision to participate in those protests.
RfC
It was appropriate because we are discussing it and its going nowhere. RfC is there for third party review.Lucia Black (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Actually a RfC should be filed correctly and not on a now failed GA nomination. I would like to go into more detail but my reverts and closure speaks for itself in this situation. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- I added that to the main talk page. But some GAN template made it so it would go there. On another note if you would like to serve as third-party then it would be best you talked to both of us at the same time because right now it feels like theres more of an alliance.Lucia Black (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am not one sided. Chris came to the IRC asking for help on the matter, I am talking him through all appropriate Wikipedia policies. No alliance is present. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Im asking for help too. He's spear heading eerything. Yes good intentions but abusing the process of consensus and i've reverted enough, any more and an edit war and surely ill get blocked. No one is helping me in this situation, and i'm stressing out.Lucia Black (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am not one sided. Chris came to the IRC asking for help on the matter, I am talking him through all appropriate Wikipedia policies. No alliance is present. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- I added that to the main talk page. But some GAN template made it so it would go there. On another note if you would like to serve as third-party then it would be best you talked to both of us at the same time because right now it feels like theres more of an alliance.Lucia Black (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
You are in an alliance if there is absolutely no middleground where we can discuss, sigh...you really not helping, you just allowing him to edit and change the article's focus without really bringing in any third party. This is getting ridiculous.Lucia Black (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- There is middle ground. There is dispute resolution, ANI and several others noticeboard a where tis can be dealt with. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I already gave the warning. But you helping himm didnt really worked out. Next time, if you "help" make sure its not based on talking to him and not with the one he has an issue.Lucia Black (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- First off I don't even know Lewis, we are not in alliance or whatever you are insinuating. That's not AGF and you have continued to toss terms like bias around at the mere mention that I was a fan of Shirow's work. You over react and create drama about it. I asked for assistance because I was having difficulty in dealing with this situation and wanted clarity on convention. I do not know all of Wikipedia's policies in every minute detail, but I wanted to be sure that it was proper to try and fix what you broke, and according to policy is seems I am allowed to do that. I haven't even really started to fix the broken stuff because you keep raising objections and nonsensical solutions that are detrimental. Changing the scope of a very popular franchise page to deal solely with the manga on your personal opinion is wrong, the franchise is notable and forcing the main incoming link to be solely about the manga is a bad idea, what if they came from another Wikipedia page, outside of Wikipedia? Its the #2 result on Google, why should it be confined to the manga? It does not make sense. Your argument should make sense and be persuasive. Your argument is based on opinion and 'because I think so' not on practicality. That's the issue I have with it. That's why I want to fix it. And I have 250 sources now to do so. If you want to nom the manga for GA, nom the manga, don't make the main incoming link about the manga. That's all. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 7 January 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback

Message added 09:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
It is extremely urgent!!! CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback

Message added 09:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I think I am done! I did the best I can!! CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- Op-ed: Meta, where innovative ideas die
Meta is the wiki that has coordinated a wide range of cross-project Wikimedia activities, such as the activities of stewards, the archiving of chapter reports, and WMF trustee elections. The project has long been an out-of-the-way corner for technocratic working groups, unaccountable mandarins, and in-house bureaucratic proceedings. Largely ignored by the editing communities of projects such as Wikipedia and organizations that serve them, Meta has evolved into a huge and relatively disorganized repository, where the few archivists running it also happen to be the main authors of some of its key documents. While Meta is well-designed for supporting the librarians and mandarins who stride along its corridors, visitors tend to find the site impenetrable—or so many people have argued over the past decade. This impenetrability runs counter to Meta's increasingly central role in the Wikimedia movement.
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
The dawning of a new year offers both a fresh slate and an opportunity to revisit our previous adventures. 2012 marked the fifth anniversary of the WikiProject Report and was the column's most productive year with 52 articles published. In addition to sharing the experiences of Wikipedia's many active projects, we expanded our scope to highlight unique projects from other languages of Wikipedia, and tracked down all of the former editors-in-chief of the Signpost for an introspective interview ... While last year's "Summer Sports Series" may have drawn yawns from some readers, a special report on "Neglected Geography" elicited more comments than any previous issue of the Report. Following in the footsteps of our past three recaps, we'll spend this week looking back at the trials and tribulations of the WikiProjects we encountered in 2012. Where are they now?
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
The past 12 months have seen a multitude of issues and events in the Wikimedia foundation, the movement at large, and the English Wikipedia. The movement, now in its second decade, is growing apace in its international reach, cultural and linguistic diversity, technical development, and financial complexity; and many factors have combined to produce what has in many ways been the biggest, most dynamic year in the movement's history. Looking back at 2012, we faced a difficult task in doing justice to all of the notable events in a single article; so the Signpost has selected just a few examples from outside the anglosphere, from the English Wikipedia, and from the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than attempting to cover every detail that happened.
- Featured content: Featured content in review
Over the past year, 963 pieces of featured content were promoted. The most active of the featured content programs was featured article candidates (FAC), which promoted an average of 31 articles a month. This was followed by featured picture candidates (FPC; 28 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 20 a month). Featured topic and featured portal candidates remained sluggish, each promoting fewer than 20 items over the year.
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
Following on from last week's reflections on 2012, this week the Technology report looks ahead to 2013, a year that will almost certainly be dominated by the juggernauts of Wikidata, Lua and the Visual Editor.
re curtaintoad
Hi, I'm curtaintoad's mum.
I have just looked through his recent messages and tried to explain a few things to him.
He is a child with autism, so a lot of this info is hard for him to understand at first, but he will get it eventually..with this in mind, I have suggested to him that he leaves it for a while before he attempts the adoptee test.
I'd like to thank you for your help so far.
WendyS1971 Talk 10:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Fully understood. If he wishes to avoid my general adoption reminders I suggest it is best to stop going into hat collecting or being to eager to do things such as requesting permissions or announcing his wishes to be an administrator. I keep a regular track of his contributions so I know all of his actions since October and hat collecting it among them. If I don't see any of those then I would be willing to hold off adoption with his until possibly late April early may before I remind him. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Just a note that you pointed to your user page instead of User:talk.
Rich Farmbrough, 20:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC).
- Confused right now. Mind explaining or pointing this out?John F. Lewis (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh never mind. Just looked at my contributions and saw your correction. Thanks for that. John F. Lewis (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
After six years without creating a new class of content projects, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has finally expanded into a new area: travel. Wikivoyage was formally launched—though without a traditional ship's christening—on 15 January, having started as a beta trial on 10 November. Wikivoyage has been taken under the WMF's umbrella on the argument that information resources that help with travel are educational and therefore within the scope of the foundation's mission.g
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
On January 16, voting for the first round of the 2012 Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year contest will begin. Wikimedia editors with 75 edits or one project are eligible to vote to select their favorite image featured in 2012. ... On January 15, the foundation launched its latest grant scheme, called Individual Engagement Grants (IEG).
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
This week, we set off for the final frontier with WikiProject Astronomy. The project was started in August 2006 using the now-defunct WikiProject Space as inspiration. WikiProject Astronomy is home to 101 pieces of Featured material and 148 Good Articles maintained by a band of 186 members. The project maintains a portal, works on an assortment of vital astronomy articles, and provides resources for editors adding or requesting astronomy images.
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
Comforting those grieving after the loss of a loved one is an impossible task. How then, can an entire community be comforted? The Internet struggled to answer that question this week after the suicide of Aaron Swartz, a celebrated free-culture activist, programmer, and Wikipedian at the age of 26.
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
Continuing our recap of the featured content promoted in 2012, this week the Signpost interviewed three editors, asking them about featured articles which stuck out in their minds. Two, Ian Rose and Graham Colm, are current featured article candidates (FAC) delegates, while Brian Boulton is an active featured article writer and reviewer.
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
The opening of the Doncram case marks the end of almost 6 months without any open cases, the longest in the history of the Committee.
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
The Wikidata client extension was successfully deployed to the Hungarian Wikipedia on 14 January, its team reports. The interwiki language links can now come from wikidata.org, though "manual" interwiki links remain functional, overriding those from the central repository.
Your Bot
Hey! I was just looking at your bot BRFA and saw that you are in trial, I have had a look at User:JohnFLBot/Docs but I can't quite work out how to set up the bot to work in the way my archives already do (see my talk page). I would appreciate any help, maybe the docs page needs a bit more description for some of the variables. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 14:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- I will expand the docs once I get time to do some debugging on the bot, which should be Saturday. I'll take a look at how your archives are configured and post the correct lines that need to configured at some point. Thank you for your interest too Addshore. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
IRC
Hello, are you avaliable anytime on IRC (freenode network)? If so, if you could either tell me your username, or PM me (mine's gwickwire), I'd like to talk to you about something in real time. Thanks. gwickwiretalkedits 23:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ill message you but for the record it is 'JohnLewis' John F. Lewis (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback

Message added 00:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- The section was removed. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Reverted the removal. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Reverted the removal of the removal! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the section Demiurge1000. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Reverted the removal of the removal! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Reverted the removal. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
