Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortis Healthcare
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fortis Healthcare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like government approvals, profit/financial reporting, capacity expansion news, acquisition news, partnership news etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. WP:ATD - Manipal Hospitals. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Haryana, and Punjab. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Not sure what sort of WP:BEFORE search the nominator has been conducting, but a company this large certainly receives adequate analyst coverage [1] [2] [3]. In addition, there is a plethora of significant news coverage, including extensive reporting on the controversial stake sale to IHH [4] [5]. These mass nominations need to stop–especially given that this user hasn't made any productive mainspace contributions, and has been flooding the AfD queue with dozens of nominations at a time for months now. Yuvaank (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep The analyst coverage meets NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 13:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep major Indian healthcare provider with SIGCOV as mentioned by Yuvaank. Agreed we should adopt the speedy keep option for streamlining a push back against so called mass adoptions which are really proving to be disruptive and at scale. Iljhgtn (talk) 00:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.