Talk:Outrageous Betrayal

Former good articleOutrageous Betrayal was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 22, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 22, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article was GA'd in 2007 [1] and was rather aggressively trimmed from its original GA state due to its creator and a very complicated arbcom case. While the original version did have NPOV issues and OR issues carving out large chunks of this article, particularly the reception, with little to replace it resulted in holes and insufficient broadness. I have concerns with the lead and GAC#3 in this state. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:46, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.