Talk:Islamic State

Discussion on remaining

I propose renaming the following pages:

And other similar pages that was never controlled by Islamic State.

Reason: These are self-proclaimed branches of IS that did not exercise provincial governance. Reliable sources (BBC, Reuters, etc.) generally refer to them as affiliates or branches, not as formal provinces. The current names overstate their legitimacy and creates confusion.

It can be discussed what should we use instead of province (branch, in, activities etc.) A$ianeditorz (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The reason they are called "provinces" is because the Islamic State calls them "Wilayah" (province in english) JaxsonR (talk) 22:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They call that right? But do they rule? And waliyah is a governing state or body but they don't govern that territories nor it's a WP: COMMONNAME. That is just self proclaimed A$ianeditorz (talk) 07:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They have or had a functioning structure in most of these Provinces making it somewhat of a government despite not controlling territory. JaxsonR (talk) 07:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What? In Pakistan? In Bangladesh?!
Bro they never go beyond middle east in terms of governing.
And that way according to you if any org or group calling itself a country that makes them country right? And claiming USA and having some ppl in USA of their own will make USA their province right? Those are factions or branches. A$ianeditorz (talk) 07:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually that is not true, in ISWAP territory they have a very effective government and still controll territory, same can be said for the Sahel branch, if you want to see more please see the specific territorial claims in the Territory of the Islamic State page JaxsonR (talk) 07:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those are rebel militant faction in pockets of isis who have a very little control there. But what about Pakistan, Bengal, east Asia, Indonesia, hind? A$ianeditorz (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
they claim responsibilty for attacks under there province name, that is the reason. Also the East Asia faction siezed a large city in 2017 JaxsonR (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bro learn what is a province they took those for a short term that doesn't make them fully functional state or provinces. Using terms like "province" (which ISIS itself uses) grants them a degree of legitimacy. A$ianeditorz (talk) 08:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Asianeditorz They use the name, and Wikipedia must use the name they give them. I understand it may be confusing but it must be like this. JaxsonR (talk) 08:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It should be according to what mostly used because Turkey's name is Türkiye from 2022 but Wikipedia still use turkey because of WP:COMMONNAME. Even the sources given on those pages doesn't call it Province. A$ianeditorz (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. it really creates confusion.
Crackithm (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DAANES as a "non-state opponent"?

Why is the DAANES a non-state opponent? De-facto they operate as a state, also Rojava is for some reason in the bullet list despite being the same country and page? JaxsonR (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is missing a list of all the IS affiliates

Although the article does occasionally mention where IS affiliates are active, what's missing from the article is a dedicated section that simply lists all the IS affiliates with their area of operation, year of founding, estimated number of fighters, etc. This would provide a succinct overview of IS (affiliate) activites that the article currently does not provide.

Like this:

Islamic State – West Africa Province (ISWAP) is primarily active in the Chad Basin of Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad. It emerged in 2015 after a split from Boko Haram. As of 2025, ISWAP is estimated to have 8,000-12,000 fighters.

Islamic State – Sahel Province (ISSP), formerly known as Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (IS-GS), operates mainly in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso. IS-GS was formed in 2015. From March 2019 to 2022, IS-GS was formally part of the Islamic State – West Africa Province (ISWAP); when it was also called "ISWAP-Greater Sahara". As of 2025, ISSP is estimated to have 2,000-3,000 fighters.

And so on... I'd add it myself but the article is locked. Fr8er (talk) 23:00, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. I think it would greatly add to the article. Witsako (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree! Fr8er, if you make that list, ping me and I'll add it to the article. Or, create a formal edit request. Lova Falk (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I don't know how to create a fomal request, so here's my alphabetical list of the currently active affiliates, using the same sources as in the individual articles:
In Africa:
In Asia:
In Europe:
Fr8er (talk) 19:05, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the text. Great job, fantastic! 👍 Lova Falk (talk) 07:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Fr8er (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]