This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jazz Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Music theory Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. YouTube Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject YouTube To-do: A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see list. Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles Cleanup : See cleanup listing Maintain : This WikiProject Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles Other : Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Other Musical Project with primary involvement: https://insideoutsidemusic.bandcamp.com/ . Probably worth mentioning. --2001:480:91:FF00:0:0:0:15 (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• https://www.bimm.co.uk/news/bimm-podcast-ep8/
• https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/scotts-bass-lessons/the-scotts-bass-lessons-podcast/e/56359567
• https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/c0d15053-c14f-4a0e-a62f-47766dd7f914
• https://www.musical-u.com/learn/the-power-of-curiosity-with-adam-neely/

JohnCastle (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC) I've added references to all but the bbc link which just refers to other pages.[reply]

I'm not sure the phrase "His channel...has been described by several commentators as the 'musical Vsauce'." adds a whole lot to the introduction. Sure, it's useful if you know who Vsauce is and are familiar with his content, but I feel like it might confuse more people than it helps. It might be more helpful to describe his actual video format than to simply do a one-off comparison.

Additionally, I looked through the three sources for that sentence, but I can't seem to find that specific phrase anywhere. If my guess is correct, the "several commentators" the article refers to are YouTube comments—using YouTube comments as sources on a Wikipedia article seems a little contentious, to say the least.

Space Moths (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Space Moths, very valid point. I think I'll rephrase this now. Ed6767 talk! 02:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article still claims to have multiple issues. Is this still true? If so, what needs addressing? JohnCastle (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC) I tried to upload a photo a Adam Neely under fair use, despite stating it was low res and cropped to be used purely for identification, it was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnCastle (talk • contribs) [reply]

I tagged it for deletion since it fails NFCC criterion #1 - the image is potentially replaceable with a free version since the subject is still alive. Ionmars10 (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sorry about the name change, I do apologize. I will read up on the rules and regulations before hand! Again, I apologize. Gongfong2021 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't always make the most pristine edits, so thank you for everyone who takes the time and fixes my mistakes! I appreciate it greatly! Gongfong2021 (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Acousmana You're right about the revert. I'll try to see if there are impartial sources. JohnDVandevert (talk) 10:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adam is NOT related to Blake Neely. This may be worth including in the document. Source: https://youtube.com/v/zUbYcMtTbHE?t=799 -96.235.24.46 (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adam Neely/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk · contribs) 00:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 08:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Images appropriately licensed
• Earwig reports 18%
• Duplicate links for bass guitar and vlog

• Removed the bass guitar link. Kept the vlog link: MOS:RELINK says "Do not re-link in other sections if not contextually important there," and I think it counts "contextually important".

• He told the magazine Spin that his video topics were, "the stuff I get excited about", rather than what is covered in music education. What does this have to do with cite 19?

• Should've been the Spin citation, fixed.

• Spot checked cites 3, 11, 16, 26
• Got a 404 on cite 28

• Added archive link.

• Nicely done--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sturmvogel 66: I have addressed all your comments. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 03:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]